본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영화영어에서 EFL 학습자들이 선호하는 현저성과 항목 유형에 관한 연구

A Study on EFL Learners’ Preferred Types of Salience and Categories in Movie English

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to observe EFL learners’ preferred types of salience in Movie English and (2) to examine which language categories are mainly salient. The types of salience are based on Schmid and Günther’s (2016) 4 types of salience, with categories of grammar, individual words, chunks, and messages. This is a case study of five college students majoring in English all with TOEIC scores higher than 800. The study was divided into a self-heuristic group of three students and a category-presented group of two students. The self-heuristic group was instructed to find out what they found salient and noticeable in a movie, without the terms salience and category being mentioned. The category-presented group was directed to find out what they found salient and noticeable in the movie, based on given categories. The results showed that the two groups preferred surprise and novelty. Both groups preferred different categories, however. The self-heuristic group mostly focused on chunks, with a preferred order of chunks, grammar, words, and messages. The category-presented group mainly focused on words, with a preferred order of words, chunks, messages, and grammar. Pedagogical implications will be discussed in more detail in this paper.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to observe EFL learners’ preferred types of salience in Movie English and (2) to examine which language categories are mainly salient. The types of salience are based on Schmid and Günther’s (2016) 4 types of salience, with categories of grammar, individual words, chunks, and messages. This is a case study of five college students majoring in English all with TOEIC scores higher than 800. The study was divided into a self-heuristic group of three students and a category-presented group of two students. The self-heuristic group was instructed to find out what they found salient and noticeable in a movie, without the terms salience and category being mentioned. The category-presented group was directed to find out what they found salient and noticeable in the movie, based on given categories. The results showed that the two groups preferred surprise and novelty. Both groups preferred different categories, however. The self-heuristic group mostly focused on chunks, with a preferred order of chunks, grammar, words, and messages. The category-presented group mainly focused on words, with a preferred order of words, chunks, messages, and grammar. Pedagogical implications will be discussed in more detail in this paper.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Abou-Khalil, V., "Learning isolated polysemous words:Identifying the intended meaning of language learners in informal ubiquitous language learning environments", Smart Learning Environments, 6(1) (2019)[DOI]
  2. Awh, E., "Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control : A failed theoretical dichotomy", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), pp.437~443 (2012)[DOI]
  3. Baldassarre, G., "Intrinsically motivational learning in natural and artificial systems" (2013), Springer
  4. Barto, A., "Novelty or surprise?", Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (2013)[DOI]
  5. Berlyne, D. E., "Conflict, arousal, and curiosity" (1960), McGraw-Hill
  6. Berg, C. A., "Response to novelty : Continuity versus discontinuity in the developmental course of intelligence", Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 19(1), pp.1~47 (1985)[DOI]
  7. Boswijk, V., "What is salience?", Open Linguistics, 6, pp.713~722 (2020)[DOI]
  8. Bybee, J., "Language, usage, and cognition" (2010), Cambridge University Press
  9. Chiarcos, C., "Salience: Multidisciplinary perspectives on its function in discourse" (2011), de Gruyter Mouton
  10. Chomsky, N., "Syntactic structures" (1957), Mouton
  11. Cintrón-Valentin, M. C., "Salience in second language acquisition: Physical form, learner attention, and instructional focus", Frontiers in Psychology, 7 (2016)[DOI]
  12. Clark, A., "Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), pp.181~204 (2013)[DOI]
  13. Dabrowska, E, "Handbook of cognitive linguistics" (2015), de Gruyter Mouton
  14. Divjak, D., "The role of lexical frequency in the acceptability of syntactic variants : Evidence from that-clauses in Polish", Cognitive Science, 41(2), pp.354~382 (2016)[DOI]
  15. Divjak, D., "Frequency in language: Memory, attention and learning" (2019), Cambridge University Press
  16. Ebert, K. D., "Sustained attention in children with primary language impairment: A metaanalysis", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(5), pp.1372~1384 (2011)[DOI]
  17. Ellis, N. C., "Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition", Language Learning, 63(s1), pp.25~51 (2013)[DOI]
  18. Ernst, D., "Novelty competes with saliency for attention", Vision Research, 168, pp.42~52 (2020)[DOI]
  19. Fine, A. B., "Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension", PLoS ONE, 8(10) (2013)[DOI]
  20. Gass, S. M., "Salience in second language acquisition", pp.1~18 (2018), Routledge
  21. Geeraerts, D., "Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge", pp.155~176 (2017), de Gruyter Mouton
  22. Giora, R., "On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language" (2003), Oxford University Press
  23. Hanulíková, A., "Electrophysiology of subject-verb agreement mediated by speaker’s gender", Frontiers in Psychology, 6 (2015)[DOI]
  24. Horstmann, G., "The surprise-attention link : A review", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1339(1), pp.106~115 (2015)[DOI]
  25. Horstmann, G., "Perceptual salience captures the eyes on a surprise trial", Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, pp.1889~1900 (2016)[DOI]
  26. Horstmann, G., "Novelty biases attention and gaze in a surprise trial", Attention, Perception, &Psychophysics, 78, pp.69~77 (2016)[DOI]
  27. Hughson, A. R., "Incentive salience attribution, “sensation-seeking” and “novelty-seeking” are independent traits in a large sample of male and female heterogeneous stock rats", Scientific Reports, 9 (2019)[DOI]
  28. Itti, L., "Bayesian surprise attracts human attention", Vision Research, 49(10), pp.1295~1306 (2009)[DOI]
  29. Jaeger, T. F., "What the heck is salience? How predictive language processing contributes to sociolinguistic perception", Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 7 (2016)[DOI]
  30. Jaszczolt, K. M., "Meaning in linguistic interaction: Semantics, metasemantics, philosophy of language" (2016), Oxford University Press
  31. Jaszczolt, K. M., "Salience and defaults in utterance processing" (2011), de Gruyter Mouton
  32. Johnson, M., "Why cognitive linguistics embodied realism", Cognitive Linguistics, 13(3), pp.245~264 (2002)[DOI]
  33. Keysar, B., "The egocentric basis of language use : Insights from a processing approach", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(2), pp.46~50 (1998)[DOI]
  34. Kommajosyula, S. P., "Top-down or bottom-up : Decreased stimulus salience increases responses to predictable stimuli of auditory thalamic neurons", The Journal of Physiology, 597(10), pp.2767~2784 (2019)[DOI]
  35. Kurland, J., "The role that attention plays in language processing", Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 21(2), pp.47~54 (2011)[DOI]
  36. Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites" (1987), Stanford University Press
  37. Langacker, R. W., "Reference-point constructions", Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), pp.1~38 (1993)[DOI]
  38. Mackintosh, N. J., "A theory of attention : Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement", Psychological Review, 82(4), pp.276~298 (1975)[DOI]
  39. Maftoon, P., "Minimalism in SLA", Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(5), pp.1091~1097 (2013)[DOI]
  40. Marino, C., "The novelty effect as a predictor of language outcome", Frontiers in Psychology, 10 (2019)[DOI]
  41. Mishra, R. K., "Interaction between attention and language systems in humans: A cognitive science perspective" (2015), Springer
  42. Mishra, R. K., "Listening through the native tongue : A review essay on Cutler’s native listening : Language experience and the recognition of spoken words", Philosophical Psychology, 28(7), pp.1064~1078 (2015)[DOI]
  43. Nalluri, B, "Miss Pettigrew lives for a day", Momentum Pictures, ~ (2008)
  44. Ozturk, M., "Multiple meanings in the EFL lexicon", International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 9(2), pp.1~10 (2017)
  45. Ozturk, M., "Acquisition of noun polysemy in English as a foreign language", Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 3(1), pp.83~109 (2018)
  46. Rácz. P., "Salience in sociolinguistics" (2013), de Gruyter Mouton
  47. Ranganath, C., "Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events", Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), pp.193~202 (2003)[DOI]
  48. Roller, K., "Salience in Welsh English grammar: A usage-based approach" (2016), University Library Press
  49. Schmid, H. -J., "The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics", pp.117~138 (2007), Oxford University Press
  50. Schmid, H. -J., "Toward a unified socio-cognitive framework for salience in language", Frontiers in Psychology, 7 (2016)[DOI]
  51. Schmidt, R., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.3~32 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  52. Trousdale, G., "Oxford handbook of construction grammar" (2013), Oxford University Press
  53. VanPatten, B., "Key terms in second language acquisition" (2015), Bloomsbury
  54. Zarcone, A., "Salience and attention in surprisal-based accounts of language processing", Frontiers in Psychology, 7 (2016)[DOI]
  55. Zeng, G., "The dialogic turn in cognitive linguistic studies: From minimalism, maximalism to dialogicalism", Cogent Education, 5(1) (2018)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)