秦简中赀甲盾未决问题辨析
Analysis on the Unresolved Problems of Qin Properties Armour and Shield
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
赀刑是秦律中一种重要的刑罚处罚方式,其主要是要求被罚者缴纳一定财物或者服徭役的一种刑罚,赀刑中有关赀甲与赀盾的刑罚处罚方式近年来引起了学术界的高度关注,学者们对于赀甲和赀盾这两种刑罚处罚方式进行了比较深入的研究,通过阅读有关秦简解读的著作,结合学术界关于赀甲、赀盾的学术著作和学术论文,对比已经出版的几类秦简简文来看,赀甲和赀盾一词在很多出土的秦简法律条文中都有出现,比如在岳麓秦简,龙岗秦简,睡虎地秦简等简文中都有出现,但是,关于其中几个重要的问题,如被处罚人被处以赀一甲或赀一盾的处罚时,该被处罚者是缴纳成品甲、盾还是缴纳制作甲、盾的原材料,抑或是缴纳金钱抵之;对于赀甲,赀盾是不是如某些学者说所的应该分为赀一甲,赀一盾,赀二甲,赀二盾四个固定等级;甲和盾所代表的价值比是不是一比二的关系;赀盾,赀甲的刑罚用语在里耶秦简中较少出现,出现较多的是“赀钱……”的用语,其原因是什么;最后,关于赀甲与赀盾的刑罚处罚方式从秦国立国至秦国灭亡几百年来一直盛行不衰,其原因是什么. 关于上述几个问题,国内学术界一些学者对其进行了研究,并提出了不少有深度的见解,但是总体来看,这些学者只是对涉及赀甲与赀盾的上述几个问题进行推测性论证,而缺乏简文中的证据支持,也缺乏相关历史资料的印证. 因此,我们搜集了有关出土简文,对其中相关内容进行分析,并结合有关历史资料进行对比论证,辅之以逻辑推理方法,最后我们认为,赀甲盾在执行上应该是要求被处罚者缴纳实物原材料为主,到秦国后期则可以钱币替代甲和盾,作为缴纳方式,其具有一般等价物属性、不分等级,甲与盾的比价是不是一比二的关系,到了里耶秦简中赀甲盾很少再现的原因是钱币流行和基于书写规范,赀甲盾在秦国终始盛行的原因是由于秦国军事战争需要.
Abstract
Riches punishment is an important way of criminal penalties of Qin, it requires the fined by pay certain property or take the coins, in recent years, riches punishment for riches armor and riches shield as a way of criminal penalties has attracted attention in academic circles, scholars for riches armor and riches shield of the two way of criminal penalties in depth research, through reading about the bamboo slips of Qin, combining the academics about riches armor and riches shield academic works and academic papers, contrast with the published several classes bamboo slips of Qin, the word of riches armor and riches shield in a lot of bamboo slips of Qin have appeared, such as in bamboo slips of Yue lu, Long gang, Li ye, Shui hudi etc. However, there are several important problems, such as the punished people were required to pay the armor and shield of system, pay the materials of armor and shield, or pay the money for the government. For riches armor and riches shield are as some scholars said that there are four levels, riches one armor, riches one shield, riches two armors, riches two shields. Armor and shield represents the value of ratio is two to one. The word of riches armor and riches shield in bamboo slips of Li ye less appear, but more the word of riches money was appeared. At last, punishment of armor and shield as a way of criminal penalties from the state of Qin dynasty to the perish of Qin dynasty in hundreds of years, what is the reason. About the above questions, the domestic academic circles of some scholars studied it and put a lot of deep insights, but for my points, the scholars studied it on speculative argument not only lack of evidence of support, but also lack of relevant historical materials. Therefore, we have collected some bamboo slips of Qin, analysis of the related content, combined with the relevant historical data comparison, supplemented by logical reasoning methods, we think that punishment of armor and shield on the execution should be real for the mainstream, it has universal equivalent property nor rank, the armor and shield of the parity is not two to one, the relationship between the armor and shield in bamboo Slips of Li ye rarely reappear, because the coin is popular and the writing standards, punishment of armor and shield in the society of Qin is popular because of the military war.
참고문헌 (13)
- 富谷至, "秦汉刑罚制度研究" (2006), 广西师范大学出版社
- 梁柱, "云梦龙岗秦简" (1997), 科学出版社
- 刘海年, "秦律刑罚析" (1982), 中华书局
- 李明晓, "散见战国秦汉简帛法律文献整理与研究" (2011), 西南师范大学出版社
- 睡虎地秦墓竹简整理组, "睡虎地秦墓竹简" (1990), 文物出版社
- 张金光, "秦制研究" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 曹旅宁, "秦律新探" (2002), 中国社会科学出版社
- 湖南省文物古研究所, "里耶秦简" (2012), 文物出版社
- 石子政, "秦律赀罚甲盾与统一战争", 中国史研究, (2) (1984)
- 于振波, "秦律中的甲盾比价及相关问题", 史学集刊, (5) (2010)
- 陈晶, "对秦简中赀甲盾缴纳形式的再认识", 安徽文学, (2) (2008)
- 任仲赫, "秦汉律的罚金刑", 湖南大学学报, (3) (2008)
- 若江贤三, "秦律中的赎刑问题(上)", 爱媛大学法文部论集·文学科编 (1985)
