본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘그렇게/그리’의 강조 기능에 대한 연구

A study on Emphatic Functions of 'Greoke/Gri'

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to reveal that the adverbs 'Greoke' and 'Gri' are frequently used as emphasis functions in addition to the functions of demonstrative or anaphora, and to establish their status as emphasis adverbs. The adverb 'Greoke/Gri' is also widely used as a usage that emphasizes the degree of state or action while the function of demonstrative is weakened. Nevertheless, in the study of directives and adverbs, there is a slight lack of attempts to reveal the characteristics as emphasized adverbs. In this study, the distinguishing characteristics of 'Greoke/Gri' when it functions as a demonstrative or anaphora and when it functions as an emphasis function were revealed. In addition, the process of expanding the meaning from the demonstrative or anaphora function to the emphasis function was explained. In addition, the syntactic and semantic characteristics of these adverbs used as emphasis adverbs were examined in various ways. In this study, the use of the adverb 'Greoke/Gri' was divided into three. First of all, it was divided into demonstrative and non-demonstrative uses depending on whether there was a specific reference target. In addition, non-demonstrative use is divided into a use that emphasizes the degree based on general judgment and a use that emphasizes the subjective degree of the speaker. The first usage can only represent the meaning of demonstrative or anaphora, and sometimes it can represent both the meaning of demonstrative and degree. The second and third uses are non-directive uses. They do not have an object of directive shared by the speaker and the listener, and only function to emphasize the information that the speaker wants to reveal. The emphasis adverb 'Greoke/Gri' can be divided into three uses. The first is to emphasize its degree by combining it with a state verb. In this case, negative sentences are combined afterwards, and the degree of accuracy is weakened as a whole. However, 'Greoke/Gri' emphasizes the degree of subsequent state verbs. Second, it emphasizes the degree of state, movement, and situation by delivering information obtained from direct or indirect experiences to the other person or asking the other person. The last use, combined with interjective, emphasizes the degree of the following verb. This third use first indicates doubt or wonder about the degree of degree emphasized by 'Greoke/Gri' using interrogative, which means that the degree of degree is unbelievably large. And it's expanded and used like an exclamation. And it functions to emphasize the meaning of negation in the form of reciprocal questions.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to reveal that the adverbs 'Greoke' and 'Gri' are frequently used as emphasis functions in addition to the functions of demonstrative or anaphora, and to establish their status as emphasis adverbs. The adverb 'Greoke/Gri' is also widely used as a usage that emphasizes the degree of state or action while the function of demonstrative is weakened. Nevertheless, in the study of directives and adverbs, there is a slight lack of attempts to reveal the characteristics as emphasized adverbs. In this study, the distinguishing characteristics of 'Greoke/Gri' when it functions as a demonstrative or anaphora and when it functions as an emphasis function were revealed. In addition, the process of expanding the meaning from the demonstrative or anaphora function to the emphasis function was explained. In addition, the syntactic and semantic characteristics of these adverbs used as emphasis adverbs were examined in various ways. In this study, the use of the adverb 'Greoke/Gri' was divided into three. First of all, it was divided into demonstrative and non-demonstrative uses depending on whether there was a specific reference target. In addition, non-demonstrative use is divided into a use that emphasizes the degree based on general judgment and a use that emphasizes the subjective degree of the speaker. The first usage can only represent the meaning of demonstrative or anaphora, and sometimes it can represent both the meaning of demonstrative and degree. The second and third uses are non-directive uses. They do not have an object of directive shared by the speaker and the listener, and only function to emphasize the information that the speaker wants to reveal. The emphasis adverb 'Greoke/Gri' can be divided into three uses. The first is to emphasize its degree by combining it with a state verb. In this case, negative sentences are combined afterwards, and the degree of accuracy is weakened as a whole. However, 'Greoke/Gri' emphasizes the degree of subsequent state verbs. Second, it emphasizes the degree of state, movement, and situation by delivering information obtained from direct or indirect experiences to the other person or asking the other person. The last use, combined with interjective, emphasizes the degree of the following verb. This third use first indicates doubt or wonder about the degree of degree emphasized by 'Greoke/Gri' using interrogative, which means that the degree of degree is unbelievably large. And it's expanded and used like an exclamation. And it functions to emphasize the meaning of negation in the form of reciprocal questions.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 구종남, "부정극어의 유형", 국어문학, 38, pp.5~27 (2003), 국어학회
  2. 구종남, "화용론적 가정과 부정극어", 한국언어문학, (60), pp.5~26 (2007), 한국언어문학회
  3. 구현정, "‘-구-’계열의 어미와 확인법", 언어학1, 17, pp.25~45 (1995), 한국언어학회
  4. 김영희, "부정극성어의 허가 양상", 한글, (240-241), pp.263~198 (1998), 한글학회
  5. 김일웅, "우리말 대용어 연구", 박사, pp.1982
  6. 김일웅, "지시의 분류와 지시사 ‘이, 그, 저’의 쓰임", 한글, 178, pp.53~88 (1982), 한글학회
  7. 남승호, "한국어 부정극어의 유형과 그 허가조건", 언어학, (22), pp.217~244 (1998), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  8. 박재연, "한국어 양태어미 연구" (2006), 태학사
  9. 신지연, "구어에서의 지시어 사용에 대하여- ‘그러-, 이러-, 저러-’를 중심으로", 국어연구, 29, pp.363~381 (1993), 서울대학교어학연구소
  10. 신지연, "국어 지시용언 연구" (1998), 태학사
  11. 양명희, "국어 대용어의 특성과 기능", 국어학, 24, pp.259~289 (1994), 국어학회
  12. 이기갑, "‘그러하-’의 지시와 대용, 그리고 그 역사", 언어, 19(2), pp.455~488 (1994), 한국언어학회
  13. 이기종, "국어 부정구문에 관한 연구-부정극어를 중심으로", 한남어문학, 15, pp.163~197 (1989), 한남대학교 한남어문학회
  14. 이정민, "부정극성 : 양보에 기저를 둔 척도성, 부정과 부정어" (2005), 한국문화사
  15. 이정민, "두 가지 부정 및 부정극성과 다른 상위언어적 부정의 부사어 고찰", 언어, 35(3), pp.817~836 (2010), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  16. 이재영, "부정극어와 부정어", 언어, 29(1), pp.107~120 (2004), 한국언어학회
  17. 이재현, "부정부사와 이른바 부정극어에 대하여", 연세어문학, 29, pp.213~239 (1997), 연세대학교 국어국문학과
  18. 이지영, "‘못’과 결합하는 형용사의 의미 특성", 국어국문학, (136), pp.163~192 (2004), 국어국문학회
  19. 이환묵, "국어의 극어와 화용상의 가정", 어학연구, 13(2), pp.115~127 (1977), 서울대학교 어학연구소
  20. 임규홍, "국어 방언 정도부사 연구", 언어과학연구, 34(1), pp.237~272 (2005), 언어과학회
  21. 임동훈, "국어 양태 체계의 정립을 위하여", 한국어 의미학, 12, pp.127~154 (2003), 한국어의미학회
  22. 임채훈, "‘감각적 증거’ 양태성과 한국어 어미 교육- ‘-네’, ‘-더라’, ‘-더니’, ‘-길래’ 등을 중심으로-", 이중언어학, (37), pp.199~234 (2008), 이중언어학회[DOI]
  23. 임홍빈, "국어 부정문의 통사와 의미", 국어생활, 10, pp.72~99 (1987), 국어연구소
  24. 장경희, "지시어 ‘이, 그, 저’의 의미 분석", 어학연구, 16(2), pp.167~184 (1980), 서울대학교 어학연구소
  25. 장경희, "지시사 ‘이, 그, 저’의 범주 지시", 인문논총, 17, pp.5~27 (1989), 한양대학교 인문과학대학
  26. 전병쾌, "한국어 부정구조의 분석-변형 생성 문법적 고찰" (1983), 한신문화사
  27. 전영철, "부정극어 및 부정극어 허용요소의 선정에 대한 일고찰", 언어연구, 3, pp.81~95 (1991), 서울대학교 언어연구회
  28. 최진영, "부정극어 ‘더이상’의 분포와 의미 : 특히 부정함축 술어와 관련하여", 석사, 언어학, pp.1999
  29. 최화니, "'이", 그, 그러-, pp.저러-'를 중심으로, 석사[DOI]
  30. Ekaterina Malik, "부사 '그렇게'의 의미 연구 : 지시성, 부정극성, 증거성을 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2012

관련 논문AI추천