접속 부사 ‘그러니까’의 의미 기능과 실현 양상
The Semantic Function of Conjunctive Adverb ‘Geureonikka’ in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze the use of the connective adverb ‘Geureonikka’ in actual language data and to describe the semantic function and realization aspect of ‘Geureonikka’. This paper analyzed the semantic function of the connective adverb ‘Geureonikka’ and its realization aspect by focusing on the realization aspect in the written corpus. ‘Geureonikka’ is a polysemous connective adverb which has meaning of ‘causal’ and ‘elaboration’, and there are similarities and differences between the two semantic functions. The ‘Geureonikka’ of ‘causal’ represents ‘foregrounded nature’, which is including new contents in the relationship with preceding contents by forming the relationship between preceding sentence and following sentence with ‘cause-effect’. On the other hand, the ‘Geureonikka’ of ‘elaboration’ is different since it has a ‘backgrounded nature’, which is not involved in the progress of the story by describing the same event or situation with homogeneity in a different expression method
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the use of the connective adverb ‘Geureonikka’ in actual language data and to describe the semantic function and realization aspect of ‘Geureonikka’. This paper analyzed the semantic function of the connective adverb ‘Geureonikka’ and its realization aspect by focusing on the realization aspect in the written corpus. ‘Geureonikka’ is a polysemous connective adverb which has meaning of ‘causal’ and ‘elaboration’, and there are similarities and differences between the two semantic functions. The ‘Geureonikka’ of ‘causal’ represents ‘foregrounded nature’, which is including new contents in the relationship with preceding contents by forming the relationship between preceding sentence and following sentence with ‘cause-effect’. On the other hand, the ‘Geureonikka’ of ‘elaboration’ is different since it has a ‘backgrounded nature’, which is not involved in the progress of the story by describing the same event or situation with homogeneity in a different expression method
참고문헌 (19)
- 남기심, "국어의 통사의미론" (1983), 탑출판사
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1994), 뿌리깊은나무
- 신지연, "국어 지시용언 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 안주호, "그러-’ 계열 접속부사의 형성과정과 문법화", 국어학, 35, pp.113~141 (2000), 국어학회
- 안주호, "현대국어 연결어미 {-니까}의 문법적 특성과 형성과정", 언어과학연구, (38), pp.71~91 (2006), 언어과학회
- 양명희, "현대국어 대용어에 대한 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 왕문용, "국어 문법론의 이해" (1993), 개문사
- 윤평현, "현대국어 접속어미 연구" (2005), 박이정
- 이기갑, "‘그러하－’의 지시와 대용 그리고 그 역사", 언어, 19(2), pp.455~488 (1994), 한국언어학회
- 이은경, "국어의 연결 어미 연구" (2000), 태학사
- 형 담화표지 기능 연구: 일상대화 분석을 바탕으로, "석사", 연세대학교, 2003
- 전영옥, "구어와 문어의 접속부사 실현 양상 비교 연구", 텍스트언어학, 22, pp.223~247 (2007), 한국텍스트언어학회[DOI]
- 전영옥, "대화에 나타난 '그래서", 그러니까'의 실현 양상 연구, 2016, pp.(70), 81~109[DOI]
- 전혜영, "현대 한국어 접속어미의 화용론적 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1989
- 최윤지, "한국어 정보구조 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1971), 정음사
- 한송화, "한국어 접속부사의 사용 양상 - 텍스트 유형에 따른 사용 양상을 중심으로 -", 언어사실과 관점, 31, pp.139~170 (2013), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
- Halliday, M. A. K, "Halliday’s Introduction of Functional Grammer" (2014), Routledge
- Talmy, L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems" (2000), The MIT press