보조사 ‘(이)야’의 의미와 화용
Semantic and pragmatics of ‘bojosa’ (i)ya.
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we aim to understand the semantics and pragmatics of ‘bojosa’ (i)ya more in-depth by examining the (i)ya in terms of semantic relation, scalar-implicature, and information-structure. The main discussion of this article is summarized as follows. First, (i)ya represents the semantic relationship of weak exclusion, and at the same time, the meaning of propositional modal necessity and event modal necessity. Second, the modal meaning of (i)ya seems to be formed by scalar-implicatures which is formed on a scale according to modal strength. Third, (i)ya can be used only when it is assumed that listeners can predict or know the information about paradigmatic focus, so it also has the meaning of 'hearer's already knowing' about paradigmatic focus. Fourth, (i)ya can also appear in syntagmatic focus. The fact that (i)ya seems to have certain restrictions in syntagmatic focus is actually related to the meaning of 'hearer's already knowing'. Fifth, (i)ya can appear only in topics that are bound to the previous discourse. The point of this restriction is 'the listener's old information'. Since (i)ya has the meaning of 'hearer's already knowing', it is difficult to use for a topic that is completely new and not active at all in the listener's knowledge state.
Abstract
In this study, we aim to understand the semantics and pragmatics of ‘bojosa’ (i)ya more in-depth by examining the (i)ya in terms of semantic relation, scalar-implicature, and information-structure. The main discussion of this article is summarized as follows. First, (i)ya represents the semantic relationship of weak exclusion, and at the same time, the meaning of propositional modal necessity and event modal necessity. Second, the modal meaning of (i)ya seems to be formed by scalar-implicatures which is formed on a scale according to modal strength. Third, (i)ya can be used only when it is assumed that listeners can predict or know the information about paradigmatic focus, so it also has the meaning of 'hearer's already knowing' about paradigmatic focus. Fourth, (i)ya can also appear in syntagmatic focus. The fact that (i)ya seems to have certain restrictions in syntagmatic focus is actually related to the meaning of 'hearer's already knowing'. Fifth, (i)ya can appear only in topics that are bound to the previous discourse. The point of this restriction is 'the listener's old information'. Since (i)ya has the meaning of 'hearer's already knowing', it is difficult to use for a topic that is completely new and not active at all in the listener's knowledge state.
참고문헌 (37)
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2018), 집문당
- 김민국, "한국어의 격조사와 초점 - 주격과 대격을 중심으로 -", 國語學, (78), pp.165~219 (2016), 국어학회[DOI]
- 김민국, "한국어 정보구조의 초점", 한국어학, 91, pp.1~50 (2021), 한국어학회[DOI]
- 杜林林, "중세 한국어의 정보구조 : 조사 '-이', '-는', '-으란', '-ㅿㅏ'를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2014
- 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미 연구" (2006), 태학사
- 박진호, "보조사의 역사적 연구", 國語學, (73), pp.375~435 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박철우, "한국어 정보구조에서의 정보 단위 획정 문제", 언어학, (78), pp.131~163 (2017), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 손혜옥, "한국어 양태 범주 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 손혜옥, "한국어에서 내면화 의미의 존재 양상", 國語學, (85), pp.211~250 (2018), 국어학회[DOI]
- 양인석, "Semantics of Delimiters", 어학연구, 9(2), pp.84~122 (1973), 한국언어학회
- 오치성, "Ratified and Unratified Topics in Spoken Korean", 언어학, 16(3), pp.25~41 (2008), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 오치성, "-Un", Nun as an Unratified Topic Marker in Korean, 2009, pp.34(3), 603~624[DOI]
- 이선웅, "국어의 양태 체계 확립을 위한 시론", 관악어문연구, 26, pp.317~339 (2001), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 이익섭, "국어 문법론 강의" (1999), 학연사
- 이현희, "‘-△ㅏ ’와 ‘-沙’", 한일어학논총, pp.523~585 (1995), 국학자료원
- 임동훈, "한국어 조사 ‘만’과 ‘도’의 의미론", 조선학보, 205, pp.1~20 (2007), 조선학회
- 임동훈, "한국어의 서법과 양태 체계", 한국어 의미학, 26, pp.211~248 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- 임동훈, "‘은", 는’과 종횡의 의미 관계, 2012, pp.(64), 217~271[DOI]
- 임동훈, "보조사의 의미론", 國語學, (73), pp.335~373 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 장경희, "현대국어의 양태 범주 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
- 전후민, "한국어 보조사 구문 연구", 박사, pp.2021
- 채완, "현대국어 특수조사의 연구", 국어연구, 39 (1977)
- 최윤지, "한국어 정보구조 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 함병호, "한국어 양태 보조사 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2011
- 함병호, "한국어 정보구조의 화제 연구", 박사, pp.2018
- 홍사만, "국어 특수조사 신연구" (2002), 역락
- Daneš, F., "Papers in Functional Sentence Perspective", pp.106~128 (1974), Academia
- Erteschik-Shir, N, "Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface" (2007), Oxford University Press
- König, E., "The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective" (1992), Routledge
- Hopper, P. J., "Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Huang, Y., "Pragmatics" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Lambrecht, K., "Sentence Accent in Information Questions: Default and Projection", Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, pp.477~544 (1998)
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Prince, E. F., "Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text", pp.195~325 (1992), John Benjamins
- Lambrecht, K., "Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents" (1994), Cambridge University Press