국어 유정성 개념에 대한 일고찰
An examination of the concept of animacy in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Animacy is one important linguistic characteristic, and there is a need to clarify and systematize its concepts and range. To identify this concept, this study approached to typical animate expressions, including the distinction between "–e"("-에") and "-ege"("-에게"), and based on previous studies, examined Korean animacy in the overall considerations. In this paper, current theory problems of Korean animacy have been raised and the concept of Korean animacy has been newly defined. The thesis also discussed the animate circumstances of each lexical part of speech based on this research and observed the animacy circumstances of grammar through the animacy of the test of sentences. Different from previous researches, this thesis wanted to use ‘animacy (유정성)’ among various kinds of terms concerning animacy, and also assumed that Korean animacy excluding the unanimate cases. The animacy hierarchy can usually be arranged by 'human statements > non -human biology (general animal statement > microbe statements > plant statements) > no life statements, and that animate substantives should include human beings from general animals. Moreover, animacy should be decided on based on the whole sentence not on literatim factors. This thesis also defined the animacy within the five restrictions like multi-syntactic semantic aspects not based on simple semantic and grammatical aspect. Therefore, it is asserted and proven that animacy is a linguistic characteristic expressed in the all sentences through grammar based on life, emotion, and consciousness, and that, through these processes, animacy influences all the aspects from morphemes, words, phrases, clauses, and sentences.
Abstract
Animacy is one important linguistic characteristic, and there is a need to clarify and systematize its concepts and range. To identify this concept, this study approached to typical animate expressions, including the distinction between "–e"("-에") and "-ege"("-에게"), and based on previous studies, examined Korean animacy in the overall considerations. In this paper, current theory problems of Korean animacy have been raised and the concept of Korean animacy has been newly defined. The thesis also discussed the animate circumstances of each lexical part of speech based on this research and observed the animacy circumstances of grammar through the animacy of the test of sentences. Different from previous researches, this thesis wanted to use ‘animacy (유정성)’ among various kinds of terms concerning animacy, and also assumed that Korean animacy excluding the unanimate cases. The animacy hierarchy can usually be arranged by 'human statements > non -human biology (general animal statement > microbe statements > plant statements) > no life statements, and that animate substantives should include human beings from general animals. Moreover, animacy should be decided on based on the whole sentence not on literatim factors. This thesis also defined the animacy within the five restrictions like multi-syntactic semantic aspects not based on simple semantic and grammatical aspect. Therefore, it is asserted and proven that animacy is a linguistic characteristic expressed in the all sentences through grammar based on life, emotion, and consciousness, and that, through these processes, animacy influences all the aspects from morphemes, words, phrases, clauses, and sentences.
참고문헌 (29)
- 고영근, "형태소의 교체와 형태론의 범위 -형태음운론적 교체를 중심으로-", 國語學, (46), pp.19~52 (2005), 국어학회
- "표준국어대사전" (1999), 국립국어원[URL]
- 김은일, "유생성의 문법", 현대문법연구, 20, pp.71~96 (2000), 현대문법학회
- 김지혜, "무정 체언과 조사 ‘에게’의 결합 원인 연구", 인문과학, (80), pp.113~140 (2021), 인문학연구원[DOI]
- 김충실, "扩展生命度层级在汉韩复数标记上的反映", 한중인문학연구, (44), pp.329~340 (2014), 한중인문학회
- 김충실, "조선어격조사 생략과 생명도", 중국조선어문, 204, pp.5~12 (2016), 길림성민족사무위원회
- 김충실, "한국어 격조사분류와 유정성", 중국한국(조선)어교육연구학회, 7, pp.73~87 (2016), 중국한국(조선)어교육연구학회
- 와 한국어 어순, "한국어교육연구소", 2017, 37~57, pp.한국어교육연구소
- 김현희, "중한 소유 관형어 출몰 차이를 통한 유정성 제약 분석", 중국어문학논집, (113), pp.7~23 (2018), 중국어문학연구회
- 김형정, "선행명사구의 유정성과 조사 「에게", 에」의 선택, 2010, pp.26, 141~195[DOI]
- 리칭린, "한중 복수표지의 유형론적 대조연구", 석사, pp.2021
- 문연정, "영어권 학습자의 한국어 사동문 습득: 주어의 유정성이 미치는 효과를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2019
- "어듸메-한국어 고문헌 검색기"[URL]
- 연재훈, "기능 - 유형 문법에서의 분석과 설명", 언어학, (17), pp.203~230 (1995), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 연재훈, "국어 여격주어 구문에 대한 범언어적 관점의 연구", 국어학회, 28, pp.241~275 (1996), 국어학회
- 유현경, "‘에게’와 유정성", 형태론, 9(2), pp.257~275 (2007), 형태론
- 조원영, "한국어 글말과 입말에서의 지시 표현 : ［유정〕의 의미 자질을 중심으로", 석사, 전공학과, pp.2000
- 조인정, "영어권 한국어 학습자의 오류--무정성 주어와 타동사 구문-", 한국어교육, 16(3), pp.331~377 (2005), 국제한국어교육학회
- 주향아, "‘와", 과’ 등위 접속 명사구의 형성과 어순에 관한 연구 -유정성을 중심으로-, 2013, pp.42, 223~245[DOI]
- "한국민족문화대백과사전" (2005), 한국학중앙연구원[URL]
- 한승규, "韓國學硏究論文集(3)", pp.23~36 (2014), 중국문화대학출판
- 현혜린, "한국인 성인 화자의 문법상 선택에 영향을 미치는 요인 –종결성, 타동성, 주어 유정성, 장소부사에 관한 연구-", 석사, pp.2018
- 홍용철, "“것” 분열 구문에서의 “것”의 유정성", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.713~731 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Comrie, Bernard, "Language Universals and Linguistic Typology" (1989), The University of Chicago Press
- Croft, William, "Typology and Universals" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Lindsay J. Whaley, "언어 유형론 : 언어의 통일성과 다양성", pp.223~238 (2010), 소통
- Sholeva, Irina Konstantinova, "불가리아인 한국어 학습자의 한국어 조사 ‘이", 가’, ‘을, 박사, pp.이화여자대학교 대학원[DOI]
- Yamamoto, Mutsumi, "Animacy and Reference" (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Yifei;Yue, "유정성 시각에서의 한, 중, 일, 베트남어고빈도 재귀대명사 의미지도 연구", 어문론총, (76), pp.161~187 (2018), 한국문학언어학회[DOI]