제주 방언의 ‘-ㅁ, -ㄴ, -ㄹ’ 연구- 연령별 사용 양상을 중심으로 -
A study on '-m, -n, -l' in Jeju dialect - Focusing on usage patterns by age -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the distribution environment and grammatical function of ‘-m, -n, -l ’ appearing in the Jeju dialect, focusing on the usage patterns by age. To summarize the discussion: First, in relation to ‘-m, -n, -l’, previous studies on Korean and Jeju dialect were reviewed. Most of the studies have proven that they are gerundial ending based on their distribution patterns and functions, and dealt with the process of change. It was confirmed through these discussions that ‘-m, -n, -l’ were originally gerundial ending, but through the process of transformation, ‘-m’ became a gerund ending, and ‘-n, -l’ became an adnominal ending and ending. It means that the function has been changed to Ending and ending, etc. Next, the distribution and usage patterns of Jeju dialects ‘-m, -n, -l’ were examined. For this purpose, the ‘research’ method was used. Summarizing the results of the research, ‘-m’ is used by all age groups when it functions as a ending. Even when it functions as a gerundial ending, it is frequently used except for some age groups, so it can be confirmed that ‘-m’ maintains the function of a gerundial ending. When ‘-n’' functions as a ending, it is used by all age groups. And in the case of functions as a gerundial ending, there was a difference in usage patterns according to the age group, although the frequency was not high. In the older age group, ‘-n’ seems to partially maintain the function of the gerundial ending, but it was confirmed that the function of the gerund ending was lost as the younger age increased. It can be seen that compared to ‘-m’, ‘-n’ lost a lot of its function as a gerundial ending. When ‘-l’ functions as an adnominal ending, it is used by all age groups, and when it functions as a gerundial ending, it is not very frequent, but there was a difference in usage patterns depending on the age group. In the older age group, ‘-l’ seems to partially maintain the function of the gerund ending, but it was confirmed that the function of the gerund ending was lost as the younger age increased. Finally, from the viewpoint of Korean history, it was confirmed that the case where ‘-m, -n, -l’ of the Jeju dialect function as a gerundial ending is similar to the distribution pattern of the middle korean. There was only a slight difference in the distribution environment, and it was confirmed that it functions as a gerundial ending.
Abstract
This study examines the distribution environment and grammatical function of ‘-m, -n, -l ’ appearing in the Jeju dialect, focusing on the usage patterns by age. To summarize the discussion: First, in relation to ‘-m, -n, -l’, previous studies on Korean and Jeju dialect were reviewed. Most of the studies have proven that they are gerundial ending based on their distribution patterns and functions, and dealt with the process of change. It was confirmed through these discussions that ‘-m, -n, -l’ were originally gerundial ending, but through the process of transformation, ‘-m’ became a gerund ending, and ‘-n, -l’ became an adnominal ending and ending. It means that the function has been changed to Ending and ending, etc. Next, the distribution and usage patterns of Jeju dialects ‘-m, -n, -l’ were examined. For this purpose, the ‘research’ method was used. Summarizing the results of the research, ‘-m’ is used by all age groups when it functions as a ending. Even when it functions as a gerundial ending, it is frequently used except for some age groups, so it can be confirmed that ‘-m’ maintains the function of a gerundial ending. When ‘-n’' functions as a ending, it is used by all age groups. And in the case of functions as a gerundial ending, there was a difference in usage patterns according to the age group, although the frequency was not high. In the older age group, ‘-n’ seems to partially maintain the function of the gerundial ending, but it was confirmed that the function of the gerund ending was lost as the younger age increased. It can be seen that compared to ‘-m’, ‘-n’ lost a lot of its function as a gerundial ending. When ‘-l’ functions as an adnominal ending, it is used by all age groups, and when it functions as a gerundial ending, it is not very frequent, but there was a difference in usage patterns depending on the age group. In the older age group, ‘-l’ seems to partially maintain the function of the gerund ending, but it was confirmed that the function of the gerund ending was lost as the younger age increased. Finally, from the viewpoint of Korean history, it was confirmed that the case where ‘-m, -n, -l’ of the Jeju dialect function as a gerundial ending is similar to the distribution pattern of the middle korean. There was only a slight difference in the distribution environment, and it was confirmed that it functions as a gerundial ending.
참고문헌 (42)
- 강정희, "제주 방언의 문법화 과정에 대하여-중세국어와의 대응을 중심으로", 국어학회, 11 (1982), 국어학회
- 강정희, "제주방언 동명사 구문의 문법화 연구", 어문연구, 57, pp.5~31 (2008), 어문연구학회[DOI]
- 고동호, "제줏말의 이해", 제주학연구센터
- 고영근, "표준중세국어문법론" (2010), 집문당
- 고영진, "제주도 방언의 의문법의 형태론―이른바 'ㅎ.라체'를 중심으로―", 한글, (262), pp.97~122 (2003), 한글학회
- 권재일, "현대국어의 관형화내포문 연구", 한글, 167, pp.427~448 (1980), 한글학회
- 김무봉, "중세국어의 동명사 연구", 동악어문학회, 23 (1988), 동악어문학회
- 김영욱, "문법형태의 역사적 연구-변화의 이론과 실제" (1995), 박이정
- 김완진, "-n, -l 동명사의 통사적 기능과 발달에 대하여", 국어연구, 2 (1959), 서울대국어연구회
- 김지홍, "제주 방언의 선어말어미와 종결어미 체계", 한글, (313), pp.109~171 (2016), 한글학회
- 남풍현, "고려시대 석독구결의 ‘尸", ㄹ’에 대한 고찰, 1996, pp.1, ~[DOI]
- 남풍현, "고려시대 석독구결의 동명사어미 ‘-ㄱ", ㄴ’에 대한 고찰, 1996, pp.28, ~[DOI]
- 배진영, "국어 관형절 어미에 관한 연구 : 시간 관련 의미를 중심으로", 박사, 국어학, pp.2005
- 서태룡, "동명사와 후치사 ‘은’, ‘을’의 기저어미", 진단학회, 50 (1980), 진단학회
- 서태룡, "국어 활용어미의 형태와 의미" (1998), 탑출판사
- 심재기, "관형화의 의미기능", 어학연구, 15(2), pp.333~350 (1979)
- 안병희, "한국어발달사", 한국문화사대계, 5 (1967), 고대민족문화연구소
- 안병희, "중세국어문법론" (1990), 학연사
- 안주호, "한국어 명사의 문법화 현상 연구" (1997), 한국문화사
- 양동휘, "국어 관형절의 시제", 한글, 162, pp.205~221 (1978), 한글학회
- 유창돈, "이조어 사전" (1964), 연세대 출판부
- 유현경, "관형사형 어미 ‘-을’에 대한 연구 - 시제 의미가 없는 경우를 중심으로 -", 어문학, (104), pp.57~81 (2009), 한국어문학회
- 이기문, "국어사개설" (1972), 탑출판사
- 이병기, "고대국어 동명사 어미의 문법적 특징과 과제-석독구결 자료를 중심으로-", 구결연구, (43), pp.89~125 (2019), 구결학회[DOI]
- 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (1998), 한국문화사
- 이승욱, "문법화의 단계와 형태소 형성", 국어학, 37, pp.263~283 (2001), 국어학회
- 이승재, "동명사어미의 역사적 변화" (1995), 태학사
- 이현희, "중세구어 구문 연구" (1994), 신구문화사
- 이홍식, "동명사 설정의 문제에 대하여", 국어학회, 31 (1998), 국어학회
- 임동훈, "‘-을’의 문법 범주", 한국어학, 44, pp.55~81 (2009), 한국어학회
- 임홍빈, "동명사 구성의 해석 방법에 대하여" (1998), 태학사
- 전정례, "중세국어 명사구내포문에서의 `-오-'의 기능과 변천", 박사, 언어학, pp.1991
- 정승철, "제주방언의 설명의문과 판정의문 - 어미의 중화 현상을 중심으로 -", 방언학, (17), pp.79~103 (2013), 한국방언학회
- 제주특별자치도, "개정증보 제주어사전" (2009)
- 제주특별자치도, "제주어 구술 자료집1~20", ~ (2018)
- 최대희, "‘-오-’의 소멸과 명사구 내포문 구성 변천과의 상관성", 국제어문, (62), pp.101~123 (2014), 국제어문학회
- 최대희, "관형화 구성에서의 ‘-오-’의 실현", 인문과학연구, (44), pp.289~312 (2015), 인문과학연구소
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1999), 정음문화사
- 한영균, "제주 방언 동명사 어미의 통사기능", 국어학, 13 (1984), 국어학회
- 황선엽, "석독구결 의 해독에 대하여", 한국문학회, 26 (2000), 한국문학회
- 허 웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
- 현평효, "제주어 조사·어미 사전" (2011), 제주대학교 국어문화원
