지석영의 길과 주시경의 길 - 근대적 어문 규범화의 문제를 중심으로 -
The divergent paths of Ji Seok-yeong and Ju Si-gyeong - an examination centered on the issue of modern linguistic standardization -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ji Seok-yeong and Ju Si-gyeong were, until approximately 1905, scholarly collaborators who frequently referenced each other's works in the study of the Korean language and letter. However, subsequent to this period, their intellectual trajectories began to subtly but significantly diverge. Their differences extended beyond mere disagreements on isolated issues; rather, they held fundamentally opposing views on the approach to modern linguistic standardization. Ji Seok-yeong placed great emphasis on the preservation of traditional orthographic practices among language users, whereas Ju Si-gyeong advocated for a 'scientific' reform of these practices. This paper undertakes a thorough examination of the texts from the period when Ji Seok-yeong and Ju Si-gyeong were still mutually referencing each other's work. Subsequently, it delineates the specific points of divergence in their views following 1905. Through this analytical lens, the paper endeavors to assess their respective orientations towards the process of modern linguistic standardization.
Abstract
Ji Seok-yeong and Ju Si-gyeong were, until approximately 1905, scholarly collaborators who frequently referenced each other's works in the study of the Korean language and letter. However, subsequent to this period, their intellectual trajectories began to subtly but significantly diverge. Their differences extended beyond mere disagreements on isolated issues; rather, they held fundamentally opposing views on the approach to modern linguistic standardization. Ji Seok-yeong placed great emphasis on the preservation of traditional orthographic practices among language users, whereas Ju Si-gyeong advocated for a 'scientific' reform of these practices. This paper undertakes a thorough examination of the texts from the period when Ji Seok-yeong and Ju Si-gyeong were still mutually referencing each other's work. Subsequently, it delineates the specific points of divergence in their views following 1905. Through this analytical lens, the paper endeavors to assess their respective orientations towards the process of modern linguistic standardization.
참고문헌 (11)
- 김민수, "〈신정국문〉에 관한 연구 - 특히 “이으” 합음과 아래아를 문제로 하여", 아세아연구, 6(1), pp.205~247 (1963), 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소
- 고영근, "주시경 <국어문법>의 형성에 얽힌 문제-검열본을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, 30, pp.233~277 (1995), 대동문화연구원
- 안병희, "국어사 자료의 서명과 권책에 대하여", 관악어문연구, 7, pp.269~292 (1982), 서울대 국어국문학과
- 이기문, "개화기의 국문연구" (1970), 한국문화연구소
- 김병문, "언어적 근대의 기획 – 주시경과 그의 시대" (2013), 소명출판
- 이광린, "개화기의 인물" (1993), 연세대학교 출판부
- 송철의, "한국 근대 초기의 어문학자" (2013), 태학사
- 안예리, "20세기 전환기 동아시아 지식장과 근대한국학 탄생의 계보" (2020), 소명출판
- 백채원, "지석영의"신정국문"이본 텍스트의 비교 연구-관보본, 실록본, 대한국문설본, 아학편본을 중심으로", 국어학, 98, pp.267~298 (2021), 국어학회
- 신창순, "국문연구소 〈국문연구의정안〉의 검토", 어문논집, 44, pp.5~49 (2001), 민족어문학회
- 한동완, "국문연구의정안" (2006), 신구문화사
