한국어 ‘오죽하면’ 구문에 대한 연구
A study on the Korean construction ‘ojukhamyeon’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze the construction ‘ojukhamyeon’ in terms of its syntactic, semantic, and discourse functions. The syntactic features of this construction were discussed in three aspects: ‘the sentence final forms’, ‘combination with the past tense form’, and ‘the subject person restrictions.’ As for the sentence final forms, the interrogative endings ‘-ulkka’ and ‘-gess’ are frequently used, and indirect quotation forms such as ‘-gessnyako’ and ‘-nyako’ are also used occasionally. In addition, the following clause of the construction frequently combined with the past tense ending. I also examined the possibility that ‘ojukhamyeon’ is used as a conjunctive adverb because ‘ojukhamyeon’ is used more often than its past tense form. Regarding the subject person restrictions, this construction does not show strict subject person restrictions, but 1st or 3rd person subjects are used more often. Moreover, I found out that when the position of ‘ojukhamyeon’ appears after the subject, the subject tends to be the 1st person subject. Regarding the semantic features, in terms of the discourse structure, this construction can be expressed the results of events in the preceding utterance, and the speaker later realizes that there is such a causal relationship. Therefore, the meaning of this construction was described as ‘a new realization that there is a causal relationship in the preceding and following events.’ This meaning is characterized by ‘recognition of non-typical events’ and ‘loose causal relationship’. Finally, the discourse functions were analyzed, and the basic discourse function of the construction was set to ‘justification’, from which detailed functions such as ‘explaining or excusing’, ‘inducing compassion’, ‘interrogating’, and ‘interpreting names’ could be expressed.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the construction ‘ojukhamyeon’ in terms of its syntactic, semantic, and discourse functions. The syntactic features of this construction were discussed in three aspects: ‘the sentence final forms’, ‘combination with the past tense form’, and ‘the subject person restrictions.’ As for the sentence final forms, the interrogative endings ‘-ulkka’ and ‘-gess’ are frequently used, and indirect quotation forms such as ‘-gessnyako’ and ‘-nyako’ are also used occasionally. In addition, the following clause of the construction frequently combined with the past tense ending. I also examined the possibility that ‘ojukhamyeon’ is used as a conjunctive adverb because ‘ojukhamyeon’ is used more often than its past tense form. Regarding the subject person restrictions, this construction does not show strict subject person restrictions, but 1st or 3rd person subjects are used more often. Moreover, I found out that when the position of ‘ojukhamyeon’ appears after the subject, the subject tends to be the 1st person subject. Regarding the semantic features, in terms of the discourse structure, this construction can be expressed the results of events in the preceding utterance, and the speaker later realizes that there is such a causal relationship. Therefore, the meaning of this construction was described as ‘a new realization that there is a causal relationship in the preceding and following events.’ This meaning is characterized by ‘recognition of non-typical events’ and ‘loose causal relationship’. Finally, the discourse functions were analyzed, and the basic discourse function of the construction was set to ‘justification’, from which detailed functions such as ‘explaining or excusing’, ‘inducing compassion’, ‘interrogating’, and ‘interpreting names’ could be expressed.
참고문헌 (32)
- 구종남, "국어의 담화표지" (2015), 경진출판
- 김수정, "‘-면’ 조건문의 유형과 시제", 언어, 43(2), pp.201~221 (2018), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 김승곤, "국어 형용사 분류" (2018), 글모아출판
- 동효예, "‘오죽하다’의 어휘적 의미에 대한 탐구", 한국어학, 95, pp.211~240 (2022), 한국어학회[DOI]
- 박재연, "인식 양태와 의문문의 상관관계에 대하여", 어학연구, 41(1), pp.101~118 (2005), 언어교육원
- 박재연, "한국어의 인식론적 범주와 관련한 몇 문제", 國語學, (66), pp.79~108 (2013), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박진호, "韓國語에서 證據性이나 意外性의 의미성분을 포함하는 문법요소", 언어와 정보 사회, 15, pp.1~25 (2011), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 배주채, "불비용언의 목록 작성 시론", 한국문화, (81), pp.285~321 (2018), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 서반석, "결과의 접속 부사 ‘그래서, 그러므로’에 대한 인식론적 연구-‘의외성’을 중심으로-", 한국어학, 89, pp.169~197 (2020), 한국어학회[DOI]
- 서반석, "‘결과’의 내면화와 의미 층위의 관계 연구: 접속 부사 ‘그래서, 그러므로, 따라서’와 ‘-ㄴ 것이다’ 구문을 중심으로", 언어와 정보 사회, 43, pp.109~137 (2021), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 서반석, "‘결과’와 ‘환언’의 접속 부사 ‘그러니까’ 연구", 國語學, (100), pp.141~174 (2021), 국어학회[DOI]
- 오승은, "疑問文으로 實現된 ‘-겠-’과 ‘-을까’의 樣態 意味 및 文法 現狀 比較", 어문연구(語文硏究), 45(4), pp.85~111 (2017), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 유현경, "국어 형용사 연구" (1998), 한국문화사
- 유현경, "한국어 표준문법" (2019), 집문당
- 이준희, "기대논리와 관련된 ‘-다 했다’와 뒤늦은 깨달음", 國語學, (103), pp.425~471 (2022), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이후인, "한국어 양태접속부사에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2015
- 이후인, "한국어 접속 현상에 대한 담화 해석 연구", 박사, pp.2022
- 진관초, "한국어 의외성 표지 ‘-다니’에 대한 연구", 한국어 의미학, 54, pp.91~126 (2016), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 진정란, "한국어 이유 표현의 담화 문법 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2005
- 채숙희, "한국어의 전달 증거성", 한국어 의미학, 50, pp.69~98 (2015), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 최윤지, "접속부사어 ‘그도 그럴 것이’의 통사와 의미 -(준)분열문과 기대논리-", 國語學, (92), pp.319~348 (2019), 국어학회
- 최윤지, "양태접속부사 ‘하기는’의 의미", 한국어 의미학, 73, pp.83~116 (2021), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 최종원, "긴밀한 절 공기를 형성하는 부사적 표현", 석사, pp.2016
- 하영우, "구어 자료에 나타난 접속부사의 기능⋅형태⋅운율에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2015
- Aikhenvald, A. Y., "Evidentiality" (2004), Oxford University Press
- DeLancey, S., "The Mirative and Evidentiality", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.369~382 (2001)
- Lazard, G., "Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other?,", Linguistic Typology, 3, pp.91~109 (1999)
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Halliday's introduction to functional grammar" (2014), Routledge
- 한정한, "체계기능언어학 : Halliday의 기능문법 입문" (2022), 박이정
- "고려대 한국어대사전", 고려대학교 민족문화연구원[URL]
- "표준국어대사전", 국립국어원[URL]
- 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원, "연세한국어사전" (1998), 두산동아