论清代刑事法律的法典化动因
Research on the Cause of Codification of Criminal Law in Qing Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
當脫離“法典化”的狹義敘事，其反映了人類文明整體所共有的法律編纂 傳統. 就清代的法制實踐而言，刑事法律的法典化程度通過臨時性律例編 纂、制度化修例、例文的司法創制機制逐步推進. 以動因的不同類型為標 準，律例法典化進程被體系導向型動因和案件導向型動因所共同推進， 前者強調法的確定性和穩定性，以維護中央司法權威，限制法官自由裁 量；後者強調法律的實效性，以保證律典的社會適用效力，彰顯了律典 的實用主義傾向和民本主義關懷. 在價值層面，無論是何種動因類型，政 治性因素都潛在地作用其中，法典化程度的階段性提升事實上是政治系 統進行價值判斷和策略選擇的結果.
Abstract
When it breaks away from the narrow narrative of “codification”, it reflects the legal codification tradition shared by the whole human civilization. In terms of legal practice in the Qing Dynasty, the codification degree of criminal law was gradually promoted through temporary statute compilation, institutionalized amendment and the judicial creation mechanism. Taking the different types of motivation as the standard, the codification process of laws and regulations is jointly promoted by system-based motivation and case-based motivation. The former emphasizes the certainty and stability of law in order to maintain the central judicial authority and restrict the discretion of judges; The latter emphasizes the effectiveness of the law, ensures the effectiveness of the social application of the law, and highlights the humanistic care. At the value level, no matter what kind of motivation type, political factors have a potential role. In fact, the phased improvement of the codification degree is the result of the value judgment and strategy selection of the political system.
참고문헌 (22)
- 阿图尔, "当代法哲学和法律理论导论" (2013), 法律出版社
- 米健, "比较法导论" (2013), 商务印书馆
- 苏亦工, "明清律典与条例" (2020), 商务印书馆
- "清会典事例" (1991), 中华书局
- 赵尔巽, "清史稿" (2020), 中华书局
- "清实录" (1985), 中华书局
- 胡星桥, "读例存疑点注" (1994), 中国人民公安大学出版社
- 吴坤修, "大清律例根原" (2012), 上海辞书出版社
- 柏桦, "清代律例汇编通考" (2018), 人民出版社
- 尚书, "王世舜" (2020), 中华书局
- 皮埃尔, "实践感" (2012), 译林出版社
- 高仰光, "法典化的历史叙事", 中国法学, (5) (2021)
- 朱勇, "论中国古代的‘六事法体系’", 中国法学, (1) (2019)
- 张生, "中华法系的现代意义：以律典统编体系的演进为中心", 东方法学, (1) (2022)
- 林乾, "清朝法律的重构与国家治理效能的强化", 政法论坛, (2) (2022)
- 朱明哲, "法典化模式选择的法理辨析", 法制与社会发展, (1) (2021)
- 黄雄义, "清代因案修例的动议权研究—当代因案修法建议机制之建构", 湖北社会科学, (5) (2021)
- 黄雄义, "清代因案修例的现象还原与性质界定———兼论其对完善案例指导制度的启示", 政治与法律, (2) (2020)
- Caldwell, Ernest, "Social Change and Written Law in Early Chinese Legal Thought", Law and History Review, 1 (2013)
- Barakerez D, "ARTICLE: Codification and Legal Culture" (1998), Comparative Perspective
- Bergel J L, "Principal Features and Methods of Codification", La. l. rev, 48(5) (1988)
- Bodenheimer, Edgar, "Is Codification an Outmoded Form of Legislation?", American Journal of Comparative (1982)