중국 漢代 방언사전 『方言』에 수록된 北燕지역 어휘와 고대 몽골어의 친연관계 고찰 試論
A comparative analysis between classic Mongolian and Beiyan’s regional vocabularies registered in Fang Yan of Han Dynasty.
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Fang Yan (『方言』), the earliest direct dictionary compiled 2,000 years ago, including 55 regional vocabulary of Beiyan(北燕) in which Donghu(東胡) tribe, an ancestor of Mongolian, had been lived. According to the result of analysis, Beiyan’s vocabularies in Fangyan, it revealed that the regional words were almost insulated against language of Mainland China including Yan(燕) area which was geographically adjacent to Northern Yan, and that Beiyan was classified as one Sprachraum with Chosun area by a high rate common vocabulary. Like vocabularies of Chosun(朝鮮) and Nanyue(南越) region which had been annexed by China, that of Beiyan also showed very high linguistic isolation and identity against ancient Chinese, and great likelihood that Beiyan’s language might be non-Chinese. On the result of reviewing Chinese historical records and Fang Yan’s connectively, it could be deduced that the Donghu ethnic group and ancestor of Korean people had used a common language, which was diversified into Mongolian and Korean language etc. according to diversifying of the ethnic groups into Mongolian and Korean people. By the comparative analysis with classic Mongolian relevant words, 20 of 55 vocabularies, more than 1/3 of Beiyan showed deep phonological and semantical relationship, and 17 of the above 20 words were common vocabulary with Chosun region. But 12 of the 13 lexicon which were used only in Beiyan region could not be connected with classic Mongolian words in phonology probably due to the lexicon might had been ‘creole’ or ‘pidgin’ as a result of combination among ancient Chinese from mainland and non-Chinese local languages in the region for about 300 years since Yan’s political annexation in early BC 3 century. This empirical conclusion could provide valuable clues and evidences for reexamination of previous researches and shed light on tracing the origin of Mongolian language.
Abstract
Fang Yan (『方言』), the earliest direct dictionary compiled 2,000 years ago, including 55 regional vocabulary of Beiyan(北燕) in which Donghu(東胡) tribe, an ancestor of Mongolian, had been lived. According to the result of analysis, Beiyan’s vocabularies in Fangyan, it revealed that the regional words were almost insulated against language of Mainland China including Yan(燕) area which was geographically adjacent to Northern Yan, and that Beiyan was classified as one Sprachraum with Chosun area by a high rate common vocabulary. Like vocabularies of Chosun(朝鮮) and Nanyue(南越) region which had been annexed by China, that of Beiyan also showed very high linguistic isolation and identity against ancient Chinese, and great likelihood that Beiyan’s language might be non-Chinese. On the result of reviewing Chinese historical records and Fang Yan’s connectively, it could be deduced that the Donghu ethnic group and ancestor of Korean people had used a common language, which was diversified into Mongolian and Korean language etc. according to diversifying of the ethnic groups into Mongolian and Korean people. By the comparative analysis with classic Mongolian relevant words, 20 of 55 vocabularies, more than 1/3 of Beiyan showed deep phonological and semantical relationship, and 17 of the above 20 words were common vocabulary with Chosun region. But 12 of the 13 lexicon which were used only in Beiyan region could not be connected with classic Mongolian words in phonology probably due to the lexicon might had been ‘creole’ or ‘pidgin’ as a result of combination among ancient Chinese from mainland and non-Chinese local languages in the region for about 300 years since Yan’s political annexation in early BC 3 century. This empirical conclusion could provide valuable clues and evidences for reexamination of previous researches and shed light on tracing the origin of Mongolian language.
참고문헌 (22)
- 揚雄, "揚雄方言校釋匯證上․下冊" (2006), 中華書局
- 揚雄, "方言校箋" (2011), 中華書局
- 揚雄, "方言疏證" (2012), 소명출판사
- 국사편찬위원회, "中國正史 朝鮮傳 譯註一" (2007), 국사편찬위원회
- 동북아역사재단, "史記 外國傳 譯註" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 동북아역사재단, "魏書 外國傳 譯註" (2010), 동북아역사재단
- 동북아역사재단, "北史 外國傳 譯註․上" (2010), 동북아역사재단
- "東方語言學網의 上古音査詢"[URL]
- 郭大烈, "中華民族知識通覽" (2000), 云南敎育出版社
- 吳吉煌, "兩漢方言詞硏究 - 以≪方言≫≪說文≫爲基礎" (2011), 高等敎育出版社
- 王智群, "≪方言≫與揚雄語彙學" (2011), 高等敎育出版社
- 劉君慧, "揚雄≪方言≫硏究" (1992), 巴蜀書社
- 李珍華, "漢字古今音表" (1993), 中華書局
- 張久和, "原蒙古人的歷史 – 室韋-韃靼硏究" (1998), 高等敎育出版社
- 정재남, "중국 소수민족 연구" (2007), 한국학술정보(주)
- 최기호, "몽골어 문법과 회화" (2012), 동광출판사
- 이성규, "고조선의 언어계통 연구" (2018), 동북아역사재단 북방사연구소
- 이연주, "양웅『방언』(漢代)에 나타난 동북 지역의 언어 상황", 중국학보, (58), pp.35~52 (2008), 한국중국학회
- 이연주, "揚雄≪方言≫에 수록된 조선 어휘 고찰", 중국어문학, (54), pp.451~481 (2009), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]
- 정재남, "揚雄의 『方言』에 수록된 北燕지역 어휘 고찰 : 漢代 北燕지역과 여타 ‘방언권’ 어휘의 친연관계 및 그 언어적 정체성 탐구", 동아시아고대학, (47), pp.9~64 (2017), 동아시아고대학회
- 정재남, "漢代 <方言> 내 東北지역 어휘의 언어적 연원 및 정체성 탐구 試論 : <方言>에 수록된 東北지역 어휘와 <爾雅> 同一漢字 어휘의 비교분석", 동아시아고대학, (51), pp.155~202 (2018), 동아시아고대학회[DOI]
- 정재남, "漢代 <方言>내 東北지역 어휘의 언어적 연원 및 시대적 傳承 분석 試論 : 廣雅에 수록된 漢代 <方言>의 東北지역 同一漢字 어휘 비교분석", 동아시아고대학, (52), pp.163~218 (2018), 동아시아고대학회[DOI]
