<紅樓夢評論>에 나타난 王國維의 논의전개 방식과 쇼펜하우어의 悲劇說에 대한 수용
Wang Kuo-wei's Narrative and Acceptance of Tragedy from Arthur Schopenhauer in “A Critique of Dream of the Red Chamber”
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Wang Kuo-wei’s “A Critique of Dream of the Red Chamber” sets out to use German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer’s ascetic vision to analyze and evaluate the Chinese classic Dream of the Red Chamber. Wang’s true purpose, however, seems to be more to illustrate or prove Schopenhauer's doctrines than to shed light on Dream of the Red Chamber. Wang Kuo-wei’s paper begins by quoting the opinions of Lao zi(老子) and Zhuang zi(莊子) on life as full of suffering. Their despair matches Schopenhauer's. Wang uses this common ideological bent to elucidate and reinforce Schopenhauer's bleak outlook. Readers are left in confusion about Schopenhauer's ascetic principles and theory of release through mortification. Wang Kuo-wei clearly endorses Schopenhauer's view of life as a struggle. Wang’s critique, however, never lays out the reasons for such total agreement. He employs varying Chinese terms to explain the Schopenhauerian sense of the word “will”(as thing-in-itself). His critique yet presumes readers’ prior understanding. If readers know nothing of Schopenhauer's theories, then grasping Wang Kuo-wei's paper will be difficult too. In conformance with Schopenhauer's gloominess, Wang Kuo-wei considers Dream of the Red Chamber a tragedy from beginning to end. Schopenhauer's pessimistic vision both informs and limits Wang Kuo-wei’s methodology, reasoning and conclusions.
Abstract
Wang Kuo-wei’s “A Critique of Dream of the Red Chamber” sets out to use German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer’s ascetic vision to analyze and evaluate the Chinese classic Dream of the Red Chamber. Wang’s true purpose, however, seems to be more to illustrate or prove Schopenhauer's doctrines than to shed light on Dream of the Red Chamber. Wang Kuo-wei’s paper begins by quoting the opinions of Lao zi(老子) and Zhuang zi(莊子) on life as full of suffering. Their despair matches Schopenhauer's. Wang uses this common ideological bent to elucidate and reinforce Schopenhauer's bleak outlook. Readers are left in confusion about Schopenhauer's ascetic principles and theory of release through mortification. Wang Kuo-wei clearly endorses Schopenhauer's view of life as a struggle. Wang’s critique, however, never lays out the reasons for such total agreement. He employs varying Chinese terms to explain the Schopenhauerian sense of the word “will”(as thing-in-itself). His critique yet presumes readers’ prior understanding. If readers know nothing of Schopenhauer's theories, then grasping Wang Kuo-wei's paper will be difficult too. In conformance with Schopenhauer's gloominess, Wang Kuo-wei considers Dream of the Red Chamber a tragedy from beginning to end. Schopenhauer's pessimistic vision both informs and limits Wang Kuo-wei’s methodology, reasoning and conclusions.
참고문헌 (31)
- 王國維, "紅樓夢藝術論" (1984), 里仁書局印行
- 안동림, "莊子" (1993), 현암사
- 장기근, "老子新釋" (2009), 明文堂
- 柳昌嬌, "王國維 文藝批評 硏究", 박사, 문학, pp.1996
- 류창교, "왕국유평전" (2005), 영남대학교출판부
- 쇼펜하우어, "의지와 표상으로서의 세계" (2008), 동서문화사
- 夏中義, "王國維 : 世紀苦魂" (2006), 北京大學出版社
- 兪曉紅, "王國維<紅樓夢評論>箋說" (2004), 中華書局
- 葉嘉莹, "王國維及其文學批評" (1997), 河北教育出版社
- 朱光潛, "文藝心理學" (2009), 復旦大學出版社
- 周錫山, "王國維文學美學論著集" (1987), 北嶽文藝出版社
- 이종민, "王國維의 예술을 위한 삶과 문학적 글쓰기", 중국현대문학, 10 (1996), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 최용철, "近代中國知識分子的紅學觀研究", 중국소설논총, 13 (2001), 한국중국소설학회
- 한혜경, "『홍루몽』연구의 다의성에 관한 고찰", 중국소설논총, (20), pp.167~191 (2004), 한국중국소설학회
- 홍상훈, "重評<紅樓夢評論>", 동아문화, 40 (2002), 서울대학교 동아문화연구소
- 홍서연, "왕국유 경계설 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2010
- 洪在玄, "王國維 문예미학이론 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.1994
- 代訓, "成功與失誤: 王國維融匯中西文論的最初嘗試", 文藝理論研究, 3 (1999)
- 高淮生, "王國維≪紅樓夢≫硏究的反思與述論", 紅樓夢學刊, 6 (2005)
- 高淮生, "新紅學的開端,新典範的創始: 王國維的紅學硏究述論-現代學人的紅學研究綜論之一", 河南教育學院學報≫(哲學社會科學版), 34 (2015)
- 李慶本, "<紅樓夢評論>的現代學術範式-紀念王國維<紅樓夢評論>發表一百周年", 中國文化研究, 2 (2004)
- 李長之, "李長之⋅李辰冬點評紅樓夢" (2006), 團結出版社
- 李希凡, "紅樓夢評論集" (1973), 人民文學出社
- 牟宗三, "紅樓夢藝術論" (1984), 里仁書局印行
- 潘知常, "王國維的美學末路", 福建論壇, 8 (2004)
- 钱锺书, "談藝錄" (2011), 三聯書店
- 王國維, "王國維文學美學論著集" (1987), 北嶽文藝出版社
- 王國維, "王國維文學美學論著集" (1987), 北嶽文藝出版社
- 王攸欣, "選擇, 接受與疏離-王國維接受叔本華與朱光潛接受克羅齊美學比較研究" (1999), 三聯書店
- 兪曉紅, "昨夜西風凋碧樹-王國維<紅樓夢評論>解說之一", 紅樓夢學刊, 2 (1999)
- Joey Bonner, "Wang Kuo-wei, An Intellectual Biography" (1986), Harvard University Press
