현대 중국어 어기조사 ‘來着’의 시제, 상, 양태 의미의 상호 관련성에 관한 試論
Trial Discussion about the Relevance between Tense, Aspectual andModal Meaning of Modal Particle ‘laizhe (來着)’ in Mandarin Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper suggests that it is relatively valid for the fact that the ‘laizhe (來着)’ which is widely used in the spoken language of northern dialect mainly in Beijing is externally devised to express the four types of the past tense of Manchu language in Qing (淸) Dynasty. Therefore, at the beginning of the formation of ‘laizhe (來着)’, it would have represented all of past perfect/durative. As the grammaticalization progressed, the fact that the situation occurred in the past was marked, but the situation combined with ‘laizhe (來着)’ tended to rule out the telic meaning due to the influence of the durative meaning of ‘zhe (着)’. As the grammaticalization progressed further, the ‘subjectivity’ meaning of the speaker about the past situation was formed. Therefore, the modal meaning of ‘laizhe (來着)’ developed into the meaning of description/confirmation of the past situation and the meaning of indirect reproach and indirect question about the past situation, Since the semantic function of ‘lai (來)’ about the past tense has gradually become weak and the semantic function of the modal meaning of ‘zhe (着)’ has become more expanded, ‘laizhe (來着)’ has developed into the communicational function as a polite question manner that indirectly ask about the individual information of listener. ‘laizhe (來着)’ can be said to be changing continuously to the meaning of the confirmation of the current situation.
Abstract
This paper suggests that it is relatively valid for the fact that the ‘laizhe (來着)’ which is widely used in the spoken language of northern dialect mainly in Beijing is externally devised to express the four types of the past tense of Manchu language in Qing (淸) Dynasty. Therefore, at the beginning of the formation of ‘laizhe (來着)’, it would have represented all of past perfect/durative. As the grammaticalization progressed, the fact that the situation occurred in the past was marked, but the situation combined with ‘laizhe (來着)’ tended to rule out the telic meaning due to the influence of the durative meaning of ‘zhe (着)’. As the grammaticalization progressed further, the ‘subjectivity’ meaning of the speaker about the past situation was formed. Therefore, the modal meaning of ‘laizhe (來着)’ developed into the meaning of description/confirmation of the past situation and the meaning of indirect reproach and indirect question about the past situation, Since the semantic function of ‘lai (來)’ about the past tense has gradually become weak and the semantic function of the modal meaning of ‘zhe (着)’ has become more expanded, ‘laizhe (來着)’ has developed into the communicational function as a polite question manner that indirectly ask about the individual information of listener. ‘laizhe (來着)’ can be said to be changing continuously to the meaning of the confirmation of the current situation.
참고문헌 (52)
- 김건희, "시간 관련 범주(시제, 상, 양태)의 문법 교육", 한글, (294), pp.161~198 (2011), 한글학회
- 박진호, "시제, 상, 양태", 國語學, (60), pp.289~322 (2011), 국어학회[DOI]
- 梁伍鎭, "老乞大朴通事硏究" (2008), 제이앤씨
- 이나현, "현대중국어 来着구문의 의미 분석", 중국어문학논집, (90), pp.161~175 (2015), 중국어문학연구회
- 李恩洙, "‘來着’의 시간 의미 고찰", 중국어문논총, (27), pp.119~136 (2004), 중국어문연구회
- 李彰浩, "‘怎麽’ 의문문에 대한 試論-원인 질문과 방법 질문을 중심으로-", 中國語文論叢, 16, pp.27~49 (1999)
- ZHANG JINGXI, "한·중 양태 의미 실현 양상의 대조 연구 -언어유형론의 관점에서-", 언어사실과 관점, 35, pp.205~231 (2015), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
- 진관초, "한국어 종결어미 ‘-더라’와 중국어 ‘來着’에 대한 대조 연구: 증거성 관점을 중심으로", 한국어학, 67, pp.217~245 (2015), 한국어학회
- HUXUANJI, "중국어 ‘來着’의 기능에 대한 일 고찰", 중국인문과학, (52), pp.87~108 (2012), 중국인문학회
- 鮑紅, "安徽安慶方言“着”的虛詞用法", 方言, (3), pp.221~225 (2007)
- 陳前瑞, "來着的發展與主觀化", 中國語文, (4), pp.308~319 (2005)
- 陳前瑞, "“來着”補論", 漢語學習, (1), pp.22~27 (2006)
- 陳前瑞, "漢語體貌硏究的類型學視野" (2008), 商務印書館
- 陳前瑞, "句尾“來”體貌用法的演變", 語言敎學與硏究, (4), pp.26~33 (2009)
- 陳志强, "試論 ≪老乞大≫裏的助詞“着”", 廣西師院學報, (3), pp.62~70 (1988)
- 董紅梅, "析河南淮濱方言的語氣助詞“唻”與“着唻”", 牡丹江師範學院學報(哲社版), (2), pp.103~106 (2015)
- 傅惠鈞, "略說近代漢語疑問句末的“來”", 語言敎學與硏究, (1), pp.78~87 (2015)
- 季安鋒, "“來着”的語法化、主觀化及其性質再探", 湖南社會科學, (4), pp.201~206 (2017)
- 蔣紹愚, "動態助詞“着”的形成過程", 周口師範學院學報, 23(1), pp.113~117 (2006)
- 瞿建慧, "論“著(着)”語法化的南北差異", 重慶郵電大學學報(社會科學版), (1), pp.112~115 (2007)
- 李愛紅, "“來着”的意義和用法硏究", 碩士, pp.2003
- 李小凡, "21世紀中國語言學(一)", pp.154~160 (2004), 商務印書館
- 梁銀峰, "漢語事態助詞“來”的産生時代及來源", 中國語文, (4), pp.333~342 (2004)
- 梁銀峰, "漢語動相補語“來”、“去”的形成過程", 語言科學, 4(6), pp.27~35 (2005)
- 林立芳, "梅縣方言的“來”", 語文硏究, (2), pp.43~47 (1997)
- 劉林, "“來着”的語義性質和句法環境探討-兼與“了2”、“過”的對比分析", 語言硏究, 33(2), pp.71~78 (2013)
- 劉義靑, "句末助詞“來(來着)”的演變硏究", 碩士, pp.2004
- 呂叔湘, "現代漢語八百詞" (2016), 商務印書館
- 馬希文, "<北京方言裏的“着”", 方言, (1), pp.17~22 (1987)
- 倪焱, "臨西方言句末詞“來”的硏究述評及展望", 河南廣播電視大學學報, 31(1), pp.74~80 (2018)
- 彭江江, "基於滿漢对勘的清代北京话助词“着”硏究-≪淸文指要≫等三種滿漢合璧會話書爲硏究中心", 碩士, pp.2016
- 孫朝奮, "再論助詞“着”的用法及其來源", 中國語文, (2), pp.139~146 (1997)
- 孫競, "安徽風臺官話方言語氣詞“來”的時體用法", 方言, (2), pp.231~235 (2018)
- 王珏, "語氣詞句末迭用式及其系統硏究", 當代修辭學, (4), pp.53~67 (2017)
- 王力, "中國語法理論" (1957), 中華書局
- 王苗, "再論語氣詞“著(着)”的來源及相關問題", 語言科學, 14(5), pp.494~503 (2015)
- 謝成名, "論“來着”的三種用法-從行、知、言三域與主觀性理論看", 語言敎學與硏究, (1), pp.67~74 (2014)
- 謝成名, "論終結性與“來着”的時體特徵", 世界漢語敎學, 29(4), pp.491~502 (2015)
- 熊仲儒, "“來着”的詞彙特徵", 語言科學, 2(2), pp.58~65 (2003)
- 徐晶凝, "情態表達與時體表達的互相渗透-兼談語氣助詞的範圍確定", 漢語學習, (1), pp.28~36 (2008)
- 楊麗娟, "基於滿漢对勘的≪淸文指要≫時體標記硏究", 碩士, pp.2015
- 楊希英, "“來着”(來、着)與漢語的時制", 廣西民族學院學報, 28(4), pp.158~161 (2006)
- 楊哲, "“來着”的相關問題硏究及對外漢語敎學策略", 碩士, pp.2015
- 張誼生, "略論時制助詞“來着”-兼論“來着1”與“的2”以及“來着2”的區別", 大理師專學報, (4), pp.61~67 (2000)
- 趙元任, "趙元任語言學論文集" (2002), 商務印書館
- 趙志淸, "再談“來着”-基於語料庫的考察", 臨沂師範學院學報, 32(2), pp.90~94 (2010)
- 朱德熙, "語法講義" (1997), 商務印書館
- Bybee, Joan, "The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the language of the world" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
- He, Bao-zhang, "A synchronic account of Laizhe", Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 33(1), pp.99~114 (1998)
- Li, Charles N., "Mandarin Chinese : A Functional Reference Grammar" (1981), University of California Press
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), The Cambridge University Press
- Sun, Chao-fen, "On the Origin of the Sentence-Final LAIZHE", Journal of the American Oriental Society, 115(3), pp.434~442 (1995)
