현대중국어학 및 중국어교육 연구 동향 분석 — 2013년~2017년 ≪中國語文論叢≫ 게재 논문을 중심으로
State of the Field in the Study of Modern Chinese Linguistics and Chinese Education: A Focus on Articles Published in the Journal of Chinese Language and Literature (2013-2017)
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, I will discuss the latest research trends of Modern Chinese Linguistics and Chinese Education, based on the articles published in Journal of Chinese Language and Literature (JCLL) from 2013 to 2017. First, within these five years, 88 articles of Modern Chinese Linguistics and Chinese Education were published through JCLL, which represents 23% of the 383 articles in total. From the perspective of subclassification, it shows high dependence on ‘Grammar’ with 56 articles out of 88 coming from this category, followed by ‘Education’ with 15 articles. Second, the total amount of scholars that composed these 88 articles was 50, and the highest number of articles published by a single scholar was 8 articles within the five years. Third, according to key words analysis, ‘X-construction’, such as ba (把), bei (被), you (有), shi (使), ‘Aspect’, and ‘Causative’ were the highest frequency key words, and ‘Education’, ‘Chinese’, ‘Korean/Korean students’ were the next most frequent. In light of these points, I conducted a comparison between the research trends of Korea and China. The result showed that Korean research focuses more on ‘Grammar points’ and ‘Education’, whereas Chinese research is highly focused on ‘Dialectology’ and ‘Language Contacts’. As for JCLL, most of the research was just as interested in ‘Grammar points’ as Korean research was, but were relatively less interested in ‘Dialectology’, etc. Additionally, there were many key words related to ‘Construction (Grammar)’ which is similar to that of Korean and Chinese research, whereas there were no key words related to ‘Typology’ found, which was high frequency key word in Korean and Chinese research.
Abstract
In this article, I will discuss the latest research trends of Modern Chinese Linguistics and Chinese Education, based on the articles published in Journal of Chinese Language and Literature (JCLL) from 2013 to 2017. First, within these five years, 88 articles of Modern Chinese Linguistics and Chinese Education were published through JCLL, which represents 23% of the 383 articles in total. From the perspective of subclassification, it shows high dependence on ‘Grammar’ with 56 articles out of 88 coming from this category, followed by ‘Education’ with 15 articles. Second, the total amount of scholars that composed these 88 articles was 50, and the highest number of articles published by a single scholar was 8 articles within the five years. Third, according to key words analysis, ‘X-construction’, such as ba (把), bei (被), you (有), shi (使), ‘Aspect’, and ‘Causative’ were the highest frequency key words, and ‘Education’, ‘Chinese’, ‘Korean/Korean students’ were the next most frequent. In light of these points, I conducted a comparison between the research trends of Korea and China. The result showed that Korean research focuses more on ‘Grammar points’ and ‘Education’, whereas Chinese research is highly focused on ‘Dialectology’ and ‘Language Contacts’. As for JCLL, most of the research was just as interested in ‘Grammar points’ as Korean research was, but were relatively less interested in ‘Dialectology’, etc. Additionally, there were many key words related to ‘Construction (Grammar)’ which is similar to that of Korean and Chinese research, whereas there were no key words related to ‘Typology’ found, which was high frequency key word in Korean and Chinese research.
참고문헌 (7)
- 문유미, "한중 중국어학 연구동향 실태분석 연구 - 학회지의 소논문을 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (91), pp.241~262 (2015), 중국어문학연구회
- "中國語文論叢", ~ (2013)
- "중국언어연구", ~ (2013)
- "中國語文", ~ (2013)
