≪高麗史≫ 忠烈王 6년에 수록된 元朝 軍制 관련 공문에 대한 해석적 연구
A Official Document of Yuan Dynasty Which Referred the Matter of the Yuan Military Found in the Goryeosa's King Chungryeol 6 years
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Goryeosa has a lot of Mongol Empire and Yuan Dynasty's official documents. The subjects of this paper is also part of them, they were received in 1280 (King Chungryeol 6 years, Yuan Zhiyuan 17 years). They are concerned with the various problems of internal troops that had been dispatched to the remote area, especially, they contain a lot of data for the soldiers of the special status, so-called "kabici baatar (kabici warrior 合必赤拔都兒)", so they are valuable historical documents. The first paper of the two documents was of a legal document origin, it is included in the Yuandianzhang entitled Shenyu junren tiaohua (Regulations to notify students); the latter has not yet found the same one, so it's great value as a material, but its statement by relatively simple, this paper only dealt with just in front. This paper compared two documents in Goryeosa and Yuandianzhang, rectified incorrect characters of the original and punctuation marks; more importantly, studied on some words with some specific usages in Yuan Dynasty, because of having Mongolian origin or being used in special areas of the social system, especially, some of them look like common word, so they are easily misunderstood. One of the causes of translation errors, I think, is that the order of academic research has not been well tended. The first step of the old documents study is making a fair copy in standard font and straightening the original text, but these steps are often ignored in Korea.
Abstract
Goryeosa has a lot of Mongol Empire and Yuan Dynasty's official documents. The subjects of this paper is also part of them, they were received in 1280 (King Chungryeol 6 years, Yuan Zhiyuan 17 years). They are concerned with the various problems of internal troops that had been dispatched to the remote area, especially, they contain a lot of data for the soldiers of the special status, so-called "kabici baatar (kabici warrior 合必赤拔都兒)", so they are valuable historical documents. The first paper of the two documents was of a legal document origin, it is included in the Yuandianzhang entitled Shenyu junren tiaohua (Regulations to notify students); the latter has not yet found the same one, so it's great value as a material, but its statement by relatively simple, this paper only dealt with just in front. This paper compared two documents in Goryeosa and Yuandianzhang, rectified incorrect characters of the original and punctuation marks; more importantly, studied on some words with some specific usages in Yuan Dynasty, because of having Mongolian origin or being used in special areas of the social system, especially, some of them look like common word, so they are easily misunderstood. One of the causes of translation errors, I think, is that the order of academic research has not been well tended. The first step of the old documents study is making a fair copy in standard font and straightening the original text, but these steps are often ignored in Korea.
참고문헌 (21)
- "大元聖政國朝典章 (上中下)" (1998), 中國廣播電視出版社
- "通制條格" (2001), 中華書局
- 宋濂, "元史" (1976), 中華書局
- 洪金富, "元代臺憲文書匯編" (2003), 中央硏究院 歷史語言硏究所
- 洪金富, "校定 元典章ㆍ刑部" (2016)
- 金渭顯, "高麗史中中韓關係史料彙編" (1983), 食貨出版社
- 박영록, "≪高麗史≫ 蒙古 直譯體白話 牒文 二篇의 解釋的 硏究", 중국언어연구, (44), pp.195~221 (2013), 한국중국언어학회
- 박영록, "『高麗史』에 수록된 蒙元公文의 用語와 飜譯에 대한 검토", 대동문화연구, (85), pp.421~460 (2014), 대동문화연구원
- 박영록, "元代 直譯體公文의 構造 및 常套語 一考", 대동문화연구, (86), pp.123~164 (2014), 대동문화연구원
- 박영록, "蒙元 몽골어 公牘과 白話碑에 보이는 旨書의 形式과 語套의 特徵", 중국문학연구, (55), pp.179~207 (2014), 한국중문학회
- 뽈ㆍ뻴리오, "≪高麗史≫에 실려 있는 蒙古語>", 백산학보, (4) (1968)
- 송기중, "『高麗史』에 수록된 두 편의 蒙古軍 牒文", 진단학보, (118), pp.31~94 (2013), 진단학회
- 이개석, "<高麗史> 元宗,忠烈王,忠宣王世家 중 元朝關係記事의 註釋硏究", 동양사학연구, (88), pp.77~129 (2004), 동양사학회
- 祖生利, "元代白話碑文硏究", 博士, pp.2000
- 許少峰, "近代漢語詞典" (1997), 團結出版社
- 黃時鑑, "元代法律資料輯存" (1998), 浙江古籍出版社
- "국역"高麗史""[URL]
- "KRpia 국역 ≪高麗史≫"[URL]
- "한국사데이터베이스 ≪高麗史≫ 원문"[URL]
- "四庫全書 전자판", 上海人民出版社, ~
- "漢籍全文檢索係統", 陝西師範大學 語料庫
