试论汉语“比”字句与韩语“보다”句的对应失衡及教学策略
The Correspondence Imbalance Between Chinese Bi(比) Sentences and Korean Boda(보다) Sentences: ― A Comparative Study and its Implication on Chinese Teaching
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There exist complex inconsistent correspondences on comparative sentences in multiple levels between Mandarin Chinese sentences with Bi(比) marker and Korean sentences with Boda(보다) marker through the comparison of Chinese and Korean translation corpus. The Chinese Bi(比) sentences can only depict the subject comparisons in comparative comparisons and superlative comparisons. But in Korean Boda(보다) sentences, not only can they serve the same function as the Chinese Bi(比) sentences, but also they can express the object comparisons as well as the pros-and-cons choice comparisons, and even they can indicate the topic shifts in pragmatics. But it is found that a lot of Boda(보다) sentences that can’t be translated as Bi(比) sentences are still translated in that way according to the survey of translation among Korean international students. In view of this, it is proposed that the teaching content of Chinese comparative sentences should be supplemented and rearranged in this study, especially such sentence patterns as the general extensive comparison, the extensive comparison that can express objective comparison and choice comparison.
Abstract
There exist complex inconsistent correspondences on comparative sentences in multiple levels between Mandarin Chinese sentences with Bi(比) marker and Korean sentences with Boda(보다) marker through the comparison of Chinese and Korean translation corpus. The Chinese Bi(比) sentences can only depict the subject comparisons in comparative comparisons and superlative comparisons. But in Korean Boda(보다) sentences, not only can they serve the same function as the Chinese Bi(比) sentences, but also they can express the object comparisons as well as the pros-and-cons choice comparisons, and even they can indicate the topic shifts in pragmatics. But it is found that a lot of Boda(보다) sentences that can’t be translated as Bi(比) sentences are still translated in that way according to the survey of translation among Korean international students. In view of this, it is proposed that the teaching content of Chinese comparative sentences should be supplemented and rearranged in this study, especially such sentence patterns as the general extensive comparison, the extensive comparison that can express objective comparison and choice comparison.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김승곤, "우리말 토씨연구" (1991), 건국대학출판사
- 이기문, "국어사 개설(신정판)" (1998), 태학사
- 이주행, "현대국어 문법" (1993), 대한교과서주식회사
- 양철배, "差等 比較文 '-보다 더-'에 關하여", 석사, 국어교육, pp.1983
- 채상려, "중의성의 구조와 인지적 양상 : 한국어와 중국어 자료를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2012
- 邓守信, "汉语语法论文集 ( 中译本)" (2012), 北京语言大学出版社
- 丁声树, "现代汉语语法讲话" (2004), 商务印书馆
- 房玉清, "实用汉语语法" (1992), 北京语言学院出版社
- 高名凯, "汉语语法论" (2011), 商务印书馆
- 黎锦熙, "新著国语文法" (1992), 商务印书馆
- 刘丹青, "中国民族语言文学论集4 ㆍ语言专集", 民族出版社
- 刘丹青, "语序类型学與介词理论" (2004), 商务印书馆
- 吕叔湘, "中国文法要略" (1982), 商务印书馆
- 马建忠, "马氏文通" (1983), 商务印书馆
- 许国萍, "现代汉语差比範畴研究" (2007), 学林出版社
- 杨寄洲, "汉语教程第二册上( 修订本)" (2006), 北京语言大学出版社
- 杨玉玲, "国际汉语教师语法教学手册" (2014), 高等教育出版社
- 屈承熹, "汉语篇章语法" (2006), 北京语言大学出版社
- 陈安泰, "初级水平韩国留学生“ 比” 字句偏误分析", 硕士, pp.2011
- 金燕, "朝汉比较范畴表达对比", 硕士, pp.2006
- 李娜, "汉朝“ 比较” 范畴表达形式对比", 硕士, pp.2004
- 全珍英, "汉语“ 比” 字句與韩语相关句式的比较研究", 硕士, pp.2010
- 徐菁玉, "韩国学生“ 比” 字句偏误分析", 硕士, pp.2009
- 张文莲, "韩国留学生“ 比” 字句教学策略研究", 硕士, pp.2010
- 郑湖静, "汉韩“ 比” 字句对比分析", 硕士, pp.2007
- 오경숙, "‘보다’ 비교구문의 의미와 정도성", 國語學, 41, pp.277~306 (2003), 국어학회
- 이경진, "현대 중국어 비교구문의 특징 분석 ― 목적어 비교구문이 형성되지 않는 이유를 중심으로", 중국어문논총, (61), pp.181~199 (2014), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 정철수, "차등비교 구문과 기준", 한국어문연구, 1(0) (1984), 한국어문연구학회
- 최건, "유형학적 관점에서 본 한중 차등비교구문의 차이", 중국언어연구, (31), pp.155~181 (2010), 한국중국언어학회
- 董秀芳, "词汇化与话语标记的形成", 世界汉语教学, (1) (2007)
- 黄晓蕙, "现代汉语差比格式的来源及演变", 中国语文, 1992(3) (1992)
- 刘长征, "递及比较句的语义理解及制约因素", 汉语学习, 2005(4) (2005)
- 许国萍, "“ 比” 字句研究综述", 汉语学习, 1996(6) (1996)