1920년대 중국의 모성과 직업 담론―《婦女雜志》를 중심으로
The Discourse of Motherhood and Work in 1920's China― An Analysis of 《Women's Magazine》(Funüzazhi)
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
《Women’s Magazine》(Funüzazhi) is a magazine about feminist movement and its transition in the early 20th century Chinese New Culture Era and was published from 1915 to 1931. Read primarily by female students and housewives with medium level education, 《Women’s Magazine》 introduced various issues, such as good housewives, new women, marriage and divorce, family problems, prostitutes and socialist women. This paper analyzes articles in 《Women’s Magazine》 to study the process of how women’s range of jobs increased after the First World War. Moreover, this paper also discusses whether it is reasonable that females have jobs, as the number of women with jobs increases, and how to solve the conflict between working and motherhood. Through this analysis, the oppressed reality of women’s lives that surfaced from the private sphere to the public sphere can be demonstrated in detail. Motherhood was praised as “national mother”, shaped as a collective cultural concept during the 19th western revolutionist movement. Even though Ellen Key’s theory that working can damage motherhood became prevalent in the motherhood debate, it could not prevent women from working. Pregnancy and birth is about sex, and thus natural, while nurture is about gender, and thus a consequence of socioculture. The problem with motherhood myths is that women are overwhelmed disproportionately with costs of nurture. 《Women’s Magazine》 can be regarded as the first voice about women’s independence after May 1st New Culture Era. Society demanded that women transform from good housewives to independent working women during the period between 1910 to 1920. However, as more women had jobs and became independent, traditional views were expressed. As expectations about women’s jobs and those about the role in a family crashed, the choice between work and family became one of the major problems that women in 20’s face. The conflict between the role as a good housewife and a working woman introduced in the modern China is an ongoing problem that is yet to be solved. In the current times, where women’s participation in the public sphere is increasingly active, giving birth and nurturing the next generation are not only in the private sphere but also important issues in the public sphere that need to be solved to prevent women’s tendency to not have babies.
Abstract
《Women’s Magazine》(Funüzazhi) is a magazine about feminist movement and its transition in the early 20th century Chinese New Culture Era and was published from 1915 to 1931. Read primarily by female students and housewives with medium level education, 《Women’s Magazine》 introduced various issues, such as good housewives, new women, marriage and divorce, family problems, prostitutes and socialist women. This paper analyzes articles in 《Women’s Magazine》 to study the process of how women’s range of jobs increased after the First World War. Moreover, this paper also discusses whether it is reasonable that females have jobs, as the number of women with jobs increases, and how to solve the conflict between working and motherhood. Through this analysis, the oppressed reality of women’s lives that surfaced from the private sphere to the public sphere can be demonstrated in detail. Motherhood was praised as “national mother”, shaped as a collective cultural concept during the 19th western revolutionist movement. Even though Ellen Key’s theory that working can damage motherhood became prevalent in the motherhood debate, it could not prevent women from working. Pregnancy and birth is about sex, and thus natural, while nurture is about gender, and thus a consequence of socioculture. The problem with motherhood myths is that women are overwhelmed disproportionately with costs of nurture. 《Women’s Magazine》 can be regarded as the first voice about women’s independence after May 1st New Culture Era. Society demanded that women transform from good housewives to independent working women during the period between 1910 to 1920. However, as more women had jobs and became independent, traditional views were expressed. As expectations about women’s jobs and those about the role in a family crashed, the choice between work and family became one of the major problems that women in 20’s face. The conflict between the role as a good housewife and a working woman introduced in the modern China is an ongoing problem that is yet to be solved. In the current times, where women’s participation in the public sphere is increasingly active, giving birth and nurturing the next generation are not only in the private sphere but also important issues in the public sphere that need to be solved to prevent women’s tendency to not have babies.
참고문헌 (23)
- 本間久雄著, "橫在婦女運動根柢的兩種主張", 婦女雜志, 9(1) (1923)
- 陳德徵, "婦女運動的第一步: 經濟獨立運動", 婦女雜志, 9(1) (1923)
- 吳覺農, "愛倫凱的母權運動論", 婦女雜志, 9(1) (1923)
- 瑟廬, "愛倫凱的兒童兩親選擇說", 婦女雜志, 9(11) (1923)
- 瑟廬, "最近十年內的婦女界的回顧", 婦女雜志, 10(1) (1924)
- 黃石, "婦女果不適於職業麽", 婦女雜志, 10(6) (1924)
- 陳友琴, "中國商業女子的現狀", 婦女雜志, 10(6) (1924)
- 克士, "婦女職業與母性", 婦女雜志, 10(6) (1924)
- 健孟, "婦女職業的先決問題", 婦女雜志, 10(6) (1924)
- 刘慧英, "被遮蔽的妇女浮出历史叙述 ― 简述初期的《妇女杂志》, In 当代中国女性文学文化批评文选" (2007)
- 劉慧英, "从《新青年》到《妇女杂志》 ― 五四时期男性知识分子所关注的妇女问题", 中国文化研究 (2008)
- 王秀田, "《婦女雜志》硏究探術", 高校社科動態, (1) (2009)
- 中央硏究院近代史硏究所, , 近代中國婦女史硏究, (12) (2004)
- 김순진, "중국 근대 여성해방 담론의 여성 배제 과정 고찰:『婦女雜誌』를 중심으로", 외국문학연구, (37), pp.37~62 (2010), 외국문학연구소
- 박민호, "1920년대 초 『부녀잡지(婦女雜誌)』에 나타난 중국의 여성 담론과 사회주의 ― ‘산아제한’, ‘경제적 독립’ 문제를 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (72), pp.263~282 (2012), 중국어문학연구회
- 朴姿映, "소가족은 어떻게 형성되었는가:현대중국 도시의 경우 -1920~30년대『부녀잡지』에서 전개된 가족논의를 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, 25, pp.335~356 (2003), 중국어문학연구회
- 劉慧英, "遭遇解放" (2005), 中央編譯出版社
- 王金玲, "中國婦女發展報告 1권" (2006), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 小野和子, "현대중국여성사" (1985), 정우사
- 우에노 치즈코, "가부장제와 자본주의" (1994), 녹두츨판사
- 이화여대 중국여성사연구실, "중국 여성, 신화에서 혁명까지" (2005), 서해문집
- 일본중국여성사연구회, "사료로 보는 중국여성사 100년" (2010), 한울아카데미
- 한나 아렌트, "인간의 조건" (1996), 한길사
