语言类型学视角下的“Num+次”错序偏误考察 — 以韩语母语者为中心
The Error Analysis of Korean Learners about “Num+Ci(次)”：A Typological Aapproach
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper analyzed the misordering error of Korean learners about “Num+Ci(次)” based on HSK corpus. On this basis, the teaching and pratice methods for Korean students was also presented. “Ci(次)” is not only one of the most frequently used words in the modern Chinese language, but also one of the most grammatically important verb measure word at a beginner level in learning the Chinese language. Meanwhile, the most obvious error made by Korean learners of the Chinese language is the misordering error. The misordering error is a type of error occurred when the order of an adverbial phrase and a complement is switched, and it is hard to locate “Num+Ci(次)” and an object. This paper analyzed the reasons for the misordering error from the perspective of linguistic typology. In a comparison associated with the corpus data, learners who use a different native language of different language category shows a clear difference in the appearance of the misordering error. However, learners who use a different native language of the same language category show similarity in error pattern and error rate. In specific, Korean and Japanese are both classified as an SOV language category, and “Num+Ci(次)” locates before a verb. On the other hand, both English and Chinese follow the basic order of an SVO language category, in which locate “Num+Ci(次)” after a verb in general. Herein, when it comes to the misordering error of “Num+Ci(次)”, Korean learners and Japanese learners show similar patterns, whereas learners who use English as their native language barely make the misordering error. In this regard, it is difficult to say that dialogues, interpretations, and exercises regarding “Ci(次)” in Chinese language books are for Korean learners. Hence, developing a Chinese language book is needed to overcome the error frequently made by Korean learners.
Abstract
This paper analyzed the misordering error of Korean learners about “Num+Ci(次)” based on HSK corpus. On this basis, the teaching and pratice methods for Korean students was also presented. “Ci(次)” is not only one of the most frequently used words in the modern Chinese language, but also one of the most grammatically important verb measure word at a beginner level in learning the Chinese language. Meanwhile, the most obvious error made by Korean learners of the Chinese language is the misordering error. The misordering error is a type of error occurred when the order of an adverbial phrase and a complement is switched, and it is hard to locate “Num+Ci(次)” and an object. This paper analyzed the reasons for the misordering error from the perspective of linguistic typology. In a comparison associated with the corpus data, learners who use a different native language of different language category shows a clear difference in the appearance of the misordering error. However, learners who use a different native language of the same language category show similarity in error pattern and error rate. In specific, Korean and Japanese are both classified as an SOV language category, and “Num+Ci(次)” locates before a verb. On the other hand, both English and Chinese follow the basic order of an SVO language category, in which locate “Num+Ci(次)” after a verb in general. Herein, when it comes to the misordering error of “Num+Ci(次)”, Korean learners and Japanese learners show similar patterns, whereas learners who use English as their native language barely make the misordering error. In this regard, it is difficult to say that dialogues, interpretations, and exercises regarding “Ci(次)” in Chinese language books are for Korean learners. Hence, developing a Chinese language book is needed to overcome the error frequently made by Korean learners.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김세미, "한국인 학습자의 전용동량사 구문 사용에 나타난 오류 분석", 인문사회과학연구, 21(1), pp.85~114 (2020), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
- 박소영, "오류분석을 통한 중국어 동량사 ‘次’, ‘遍’, ‘下’ 지도방안연구: 외국어 고등학교 학생들을 대상으로", 석사, pp.2020
- 박정애, "语块教学法在汉语教学中的应用研究", 중국언어연구, (62), pp.241~262 (2016), 한국중국언어학회
- 蔡颖, "面向对外汉语教学的“V+X+Q动”结构研究", 석사, pp.2012
- 车慧, "韩国留学生学习汉语动量短语的偏误分析", 语言文字学术研究, (6), pp.30~31 (2012)
- 高亚楠, "“数量+动”与“动+数量”构式的不对称性解析", 中南大学学报, (6), pp.259~263 (2013)
- 胡裕树, "现代汉语" (2004), 上海教育出版社
- 黄伯荣, "现代汉语" (2002), 高等教育出版社
- 姜丽萍, "표준중국어" (2017), 다락원
- 姜丽萍, "HSK语言点大纲解析与练习" (2017), 外语教学与研究出版社
- 康玉华, "301句로 끝내는 중국어회화" (2006), 다락원
- 李泉, "通用型、区域型、语别型、国别型―谈国际汉语教材的多元化", 汉语学习, (1), pp.76~84 (2015)
- 李晓蓉, "浅议动量短语的前置现象", 汉语学习, (2), pp.37~40 (1995)
- 李宇明, "“一量VP”的语法、语义特点", 语言教学与研究, (3), pp.102~113 (1998)
- 李在恩, "韩国留学生习得汉语动量词的偏误研究", 석사, pp.2012
- 柳燕梅, "生词重现率对欧美学生汉语词汇学习的影响", 语言教学与研究, (5), pp.59~63 (2002)
- 鲁健骥, "中介语研究中的几个问题", 语言文字应用, (1), pp.21~25 (1993)
- 鲁健骥, "外国人学汉语的语法偏误分析", 语言教学与研究, (1), pp.49~64 (1994)
- 陆丙甫, "语序优势的认知解释(上)：论可别度对语序的普遍影响", 当代语言学, (1), pp.1~15 (2005)
- 马箭飞, "신공략중국어 초급편" (2006), 다락원
- 邵敬敏, "动量词的语义分析及其与动词的选择关系", 中国语文, (2), pp.100~109 (1996)
- 石毓智, "语法化的动因与机制" (2006), 北京大学出版社
- 王欢欢, "留学生使用频率较高的动量词及使用偏误分析", 석사, pp.2012
- 王静, "‘个别性’与动词后量成分和名词的语序", 语言教学与研究, (1), pp.48~54 (2001)
- 徐丹, "量词及其类型学考察", 语言科学, 10(6), pp.561~573 (2011)
- 杨娟, "动量短语在句法结构中的位置及意义", 석사, pp.2004
- 叶桂郴, "略论句法位置对同现关系的制约", 汉语学习, (1), pp.3~7 (2007)
- 殷志平, "动量前置特点略论", 语法研究和探索, 9, pp.299~307 (2000)
- 张伯江, "汉语功能语法研究" (1996), 江西教育出版社
- 张国宪, "略论句法位置对同现关系的制约", 汉语学习, (1), pp.3~7 (1998)
- 张谊生, "句法层面的语序与句子层面的语序――兼论一价谓词带宾语与副词状语表程度", 语言研究, (3), pp.40~51 (2013)
- Adjemian, Christian, "On the Nature of Interlanguage Systems", Language Learning, 26(2), pp.297~320 (1976)
- Lewis, Michael, "The Lexical Approach" (1993), Language Teaching Publications