《兒女英雄傳》에서 ‘把’의 등극과 언어접촉이론
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper observes that in terms of ‘ba’ construction, there are similarities among the error phenomena of Korean students and the features of dialects in New territory､ Blue sea provinces and also in some other northern dialects described in historical documents. According to this observation of “the tale of heros and heroine”, this article interprets the generating mechanism of ‘ba’ Construction in the history. It claims that the leading role of ‘ba’ in North Chinese has something to do with its contacts with the Altaic languages. Specifically, the resigning of ‘jiang(將)’ and abruptly flourishing of ‘ba(把)’ in North Chinese, is due to the sound similarity between ‘ba’ and the objective marker in the Jurchen and Manchu language, which is [ba] and [be]. It further holds that ‘surviving together’ and ‘mutually rejecting’ principles are universally essential to borrowing mechanism in language contacts ― ‘the essential features of Magnet’, it is really worth referring to the theory of language contact in linguistic universal.
Abstract
This paper observes that in terms of ‘ba’ construction, there are similarities among the error phenomena of Korean students and the features of dialects in New territory､ Blue sea provinces and also in some other northern dialects described in historical documents. According to this observation of “the tale of heros and heroine”, this article interprets the generating mechanism of ‘ba’ Construction in the history. It claims that the leading role of ‘ba’ in North Chinese has something to do with its contacts with the Altaic languages. Specifically, the resigning of ‘jiang(將)’ and abruptly flourishing of ‘ba(把)’ in North Chinese, is due to the sound similarity between ‘ba’ and the objective marker in the Jurchen and Manchu language, which is [ba] and [be]. It further holds that ‘surviving together’ and ‘mutually rejecting’ principles are universally essential to borrowing mechanism in language contacts ― ‘the essential features of Magnet’, it is really worth referring to the theory of language contact in linguistic universal.
참고문헌 (49)
- 胡适, "中国章回小说考证" (1943), 实业印书馆
- 祝敏徹, "論初期處置式", 語言學論丛, 1 (1957)
- 余志鸿, "元代漢語中的后置詞‘行", 語文研究, (8) (1983)
- 杨玉秀, "老舍作品中的北京話詞語例释·序" (1984), 北京大學出版社
- 赵志忠, "兒女英雄傳 的满语語彙特色", 民族文学研究, (3) (1985)
- 季永海, "满语语法" (1986), 民族出版社
- 橋本萬太郞, "語言地理类型學" (1985), 北京大學出版社
- 太田辰夫, "漢語史通考" (1991), 重庆出版社
- 梅祖麟, "從語言史看幾本元雜劇賓白的寫作時期", 語言學論丛, 13, pp.111~153 (1986), 商务印书馆
- 梅祖麟, "唐宋處置式的来源", 中国語文, (3) (1990)
- 许仰民, "論《金瓶梅詞話》的‘把(將)’字句", 信阳師範學院學报, (4) (1990)
- 刁晏斌, "试論近代漢語語法的特点", 遼寧師範大學學报, (1) (1991)
- 陈连庆, "中国古代少数民族姓氏研究―秦汉魏晋南北朝少数民族姓氏研究" (1993), 吉林文史出版社
- 吕一飞, "胡族习俗與隋唐风韵: 魏晋北朝北方少数民族社会风俗及其对隋唐的影响" (1994), 书目文献出版社
- 李思明, "《朱子語類》的處置式", 安庆师範學院學报, (1) (1994)
- 龚千炎, "《兒女英雄傳》是《紅樓夢》通向现代北京話的中途站", 《兒女英雄傳》是《紅樓夢》通向现代北京話的中途站, (1) (1994)
- 江蓝生, "說‘麽’與‘們’同源", 中国语文, (3) (1995)
- 吴福祥, "敦煌变文語法研究" (1996), 岳鹿书社
- 陶紅印, "無定式把字句在近､ 现代漢語中的地位问题及其理論意義", 中国語文, (5) (2000)
- 林焘, "普通話與北京話" (2000), 語文出版社
- 祖生利, "元代白話碑文研究", 박사, pp.2000
- 祖生利, "元代白话碑文中助词的特殊用法", 中国语文, (5) (2002)
- 沈家煊, "如何處置‘處置式’?―論把字句主觀性", 中国語文, (5) (2002)
- 張美蘭, "《祖堂集》語法研究》" (2003), 商务印书馆
- 北京大學中文系語言學教研室, "漢語方音字汇(第二版重版本)" (2003), 語文出版社
- 孫伯君, "金代女真語" (2004), 遼寧民族出版社
- 李崇興, "論元代蒙古語对漢語語法的影響", 語文研究, (3) (2005)
- 陈淑梅, "粤語中‘把’字句的弱位状态", 湛江師範學院學报, (4) (2005)
- 王麗, "《西游记》中的‘將’字句研究", 潍坊教育學院學报, (1) (2008)
- 張小芳, "‘將’字句的历时演变轨迹及其衰落的動因", 现代語文, (7) (2008)
- 王进, "元刊杂剧中的‘把(將)’字句", 郧阳師範高等专科學校學报, (2) (2009)
- 李小凡, "漢語方言學基礎教程" (2009), 北京大學出版社
- 成燕燕, "维吾尔族､ 哈萨克族漢語語法教學难点释疑" (2009), 商务印书馆
- 金道榮, "清代带满腔满味的‘满汉语’语言现象", 文化遗产, (1)통권 : 10 (2010)
- 金道榮, "論阿爾泰語法背景下的漢語把字句偏誤的生成機制與敎學對策", 박사, 中國語言文學系, pp.2010
- 魏茵来希, "Language in contact: Findings and Problems" (1953), Mouton
- N.鲍培, "阿尔泰語言學导論(周建奇译)" (2004), 内蒙古教育出版社
- Liliya M. Corelova, "Manchu Grammar" (2002), Brill
- 吳富尹, "北魏의 漢化政策과 學校敎育制度", 논문집, 23 (1999), 제주한라대학
- 권재일, "퉁구스어의 음운구조와 문법구조 연구", 알타이학보, (10) (2000), 한국알타이학회
- 이인호, "《아녀영웅전》의 성취와 그 한계", 중어중문학, 9 (1987), 한국중어중문학회
- 金明信, "『兒女英雄傳』에 나타난 언어현상", 중국소설논총, 17, pp.161~184 (2003), 한국중국소설학회
- 최재영, "兒女英雄傳 被자피동문 小考", 중국연구, 39 (2007), 중국연구소
- 최재영, "『儿女英雄传』 의지류 조동사 考察", 중국학연구, 39(58), pp.293~318 (2011), 중국학연구회
- 안지추, "안씨가훈" (2004), 고즈윈
- 김명신, "아녀영웅전" (2009), 지만지
- 김도영, "《红楼梦》의 특수언어현상", 중국소설논총, (36), pp.149~171 (2012), 한국중국소설학회[DOI]
- 김도영, "HSK코퍼스 중 한국 학생의 把字句 오류분석과 유추", 중국어문논총, (53), pp.127~150 (2012), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 김도영, "『元刊本』의Neg", Aux後置에대하여, 2012, pp.(41), 249~274[DOI]