閻連科小說《四書》倣聖經體語言硏究
A Research on Biblical Languages in Yan Lian Ke's Novel Sishu(四書)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
從整體來看《四書》是一部寓言性非常強的作品, 正因為這部作品中的方方面面都涉及到對歷史和當下意識形態的批判, 閻連科在他的散文作品《發現小說》中說到,《四書》是他‘可能已經徹底無法出版’的作品。 閻連科通過仿聖經體借用聖經中的宗教含義來實現作品對真實的闡述和表達, 延伸小說文本的內涵, 深化小說的主題含義。對《四書》中的仿聖經體語言意義, 可做如下總結。 第一, 仿聖經體語言暗示神的存在。小说一開始模仿聖經<創世紀>的語言形式暗示了‘上帝’的存在, 這个‘上帝’就是擁有強大權力的當權者。小說人物‘孩子’是育新區的管理者, 向所有人傳達‘上帝’的旨意。 第二, 仿聖經體語言暗示原罪的認定。原罪是指人天生且無法擺脫的罪行。育新區的知識分子就是有‘原罪’的人,因為他們擁有當權者恐懼的自由意志和思想。因為知識分子的原罪, 他們被放逐到育新區進行改造。知識分子只要按照當權者的旨意行動則會平安, 如果反抗就會受到嚴厲的懲罰。 第三, 仿聖經體語言暗示懲罰的必然性。一旦有罪, 就必然受到懲罰。小說中的當權者是‘上帝’, 他們擁有懲罰的‘權利’, 可以對任何反抗他們的人執行懲罰, 震懾他人, 鞏固自己的統治。然而, 所有違背自然客觀規律的人更會受到客觀規律的懲罰, 包括那些自以為無所不能的當權者們。這裡的懲罰和當權者執行的懲罰不同, 當權者執行的懲罰是極權主義的產物, 而客觀規律的懲罰才是現實的警示。 仿聖經體語言把小說和宗教結合在一起, 把權利和人性的黑暗面放大, 引發深刻的思考, 達到對真正現實的探求。當然, 小說和宗教的聯繫不是作者在勸導人們向善, 而是從另一個角度揭露權利和人的本性, 探討存在的意義和尋找被隱藏的真實。小說語言的混合使用是閻連科的小說創作技巧之一。為更好的表現小說主題, 閻連科致力於開創新的小說創作模式, 其中小說語言的靈活使用就是其中之一。閻連科的小說語言一直是一個重要的研究方向, 今後, 關於他的小說語言研究會更加豐富, 更加深入。
Abstract
Yan Lian Ke(閻連科)'s Novelistic languages present multifarious characteristics, and they are his novel's distinct features and meaningful themes of study. Using Henan dialects, Yan Lian Ke expresses local native consciousness in his works, and through the language of the Cultural Revolution he satirizes society. Therefore, he expresses specific meanings through a variety of linguistic techniques. His diversification of novelistic languages is not for a simple variation of creative techniques but for the delivery of specific themes and hidden meanings of works. He wrote his novel Sishu(四書) using a plenty of biblical languages, and it is the novel's distinct feature and presents complex meanings. First, imitation of biblical languages connotes the existence of God. The Bible says God is omniscient and omnipotent, and rules over everything. In the novel, God exists and He is a totalitarian ruler. A novelistic character 'Ai' is an administrator of Yushin District, and his image is similar to Jesus in the Bible. Representing God, Jesus carries out the delivery of divine will. 'Ai' has the same feature with Jesus, because every time he came back from the outside world he brought to ruler's will. Since the ruler is God, everyone must unconditionally obey His order, although it is contrast to the law of nature. Anyone who violates it he or she will be punished severely. Second, imitation of biblical languages connotes sins. The original sin is human being's native and unavoidable vice. Intellectuals in Yushin District were born with the original sin, since they have free will and thought which the ruler is afraid of. Because of their original sin, they are punished to be banished from the district. If they comply with ruler's will, they can enjoy peaceful life. However, if they violate ruler's will, they can be punished severely, even can cost their life. Third, imitation of biblical languages connotes the sense of punishment. If someone commits a sin, he or she will be punished without exception. It is clear that person in power in the novel is God, but the novelist implies the existence of true God. A great leap itself violates the regulation of nature. Violation of objective regulation of nature is the same with the violation of God's will, and person who commits this sin will be punished with a severe famine. Punishment here is different from ruler's punishment. Punishment by a person in power is a product of totalitarianism, but God's punishment is a real warning. Borrowing biblical languages combines a novel and a religion and then stands out the dark side of politics and human beings, thus making people think deeply. The aim of Yan Lian Ke's linking of a novel with a religion is not to advise people to live a virtuous life, but to expose the true color of human beings from other perspectives and then search for the meaning of human existence. In this regard, borrowing biblical languages in the novel has the value of research.
참고문헌 (11)
- 대한성서공회, "韓中聖經―新標點和合本 簡體版" (2005), 한일프린테크
- 龍慧萍, "在宗教的對立面―評閻連科的《四書》", 鄭州師範教育, (1) (2014)
- 梁曉聲, "中國社會各階層分析" (2014), 文化藝術出版社
- 劉熹, "現實與寓言的交匯, 真實與虛構的對話―關於閻連科《四書》的評論", 小說評論, (3) (2012)
- 任東升, "聖經漢譯文化研究" (2007), 湖北教育出版社
- 許若文, "《四書》中的零因果與撕裂現實主義的文體", 南方文壇, (2) (2012)
- 閻連科, "我的現實, 我的主義" (2011), 中國人民大學出版社
- 閻連科, "四書" (2011), 麥田出版
- 閻連科, "發現小說" (2011), 南開大學出版社
- 漢娜⋅阿倫特, "極權主義的起源" (2014), 三聯書店
- 達西安娜⋅菲薩克, "歷史真實與文學真實―評閻連科", 東吳學術, (5) (2014)
