본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

옌롄커 소설 『풍아송(風雅頌)』 연구

A Study on Yan Lianke(閻連科)’s FengYaSong(風雅頌)

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In the current absurdity of Chinese society, Yan Lianke created the unusual, mean, hypocritical psychopathic intellectual Yangke(楊科). What kind of psychological background did the artist's figure, a grotesque intellectual, originate from? It was created by the combination of the original sin consciousness of Yan Lianke and the conscience as an intellectual. It was criticized that an intellectual from a rural village portrayed a ridiculous monster intellectual figure without knowing the reality of a Chinese intellectual, but his position as a writer seems clear. Intellectuals parasitic in an absurd society, Where is the intellectual dignity? Does the Chinese intellectual dignity exist? He is asking endless questions. In addition, he tells us that Shijing(詩經) is no longer a Chinese Bible because he pulled Shijing from the altar of Confucian scriptures to a dirty and barren land. So, she revealed the loss of traditional culture represented by Shijing and the fake dignity of Chinese intellectuals representing Yangke. FengYaSong expresses the artist's desire to seek the dignity of intellectuals by minimizing and comicalizing the appearance of extremely secular and fallen intellectuals.

Abstract

In the current absurdity of Chinese society, Yan Lianke created the unusual, mean, hypocritical psychopathic intellectual Yangke(楊科). What kind of psychological background did the artist's figure, a grotesque intellectual, originate from? It was created by the combination of the original sin consciousness of Yan Lianke and the conscience as an intellectual. It was criticized that an intellectual from a rural village portrayed a ridiculous monster intellectual figure without knowing the reality of a Chinese intellectual, but his position as a writer seems clear. Intellectuals parasitic in an absurd society, Where is the intellectual dignity? Does the Chinese intellectual dignity exist? He is asking endless questions. In addition, he tells us that Shijing(詩經) is no longer a Chinese Bible because he pulled Shijing from the altar of Confucian scriptures to a dirty and barren land. So, she revealed the loss of traditional culture represented by Shijing and the fake dignity of Chinese intellectuals representing Yangke. FengYaSong expresses the artist's desire to seek the dignity of intellectuals by minimizing and comicalizing the appearance of extremely secular and fallen intellectuals.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 노암 촘스키, "지식인의 책무" (2005), 황소걸음
  2. 에드워드 사이드, "권력과 지성인" (1996), 창
  3. 옌롄커, "나와 아버지" (2011), 자음과 모음
  4. 옌롄커, "풍아송" (2014), 문학동네
  5. 프란츠 카프카, "위대한 꿈의 기록" (2005), 북인
  6. 손민규, "중국에서 가장 뜨거운 소설가, 옌롄커에게 듣다", 채널예스, 2014.03.19, 예스인터뷰 7문7답, ~ (2014)
  7. 옌롄커, "국가적 기억상실을 거부한다 ― 중국발 ‘코로나바이러스 감염증-19’ 확산에 부쳐", 대산문화, (봄) (2020)
  8. 옌롄커, "실패한 사람 ― 내가 경험한 중국과 문학", 대산문화, (봄) (2020)
  9. 조운찬, "옌롄커의 한숨", 경향신문, 2019.11.13., ~ (2019)
  10. 閻連科, "風雅頌" (2008), 麥田出版
  11. 蔡誠, "我一生的寫作在二十歲前就全部完成――訪著名作家閻連科", 語文世界(初中版) (2006)
  12. 桦桢, "『风雅颂』和阎连科的理想国)", 小說評論, (6) (2011)
  13. 黃書泉, "抵達精神本源的荒誕――爲長篇小說"風雅頌"一辨", 小說評論, (9) (2008)
  14. 阚海阳, "阎连科小说"风雅颂"对"诗经"元素的应用和变异", 名作欣賞, (27) (2016)
  15. 李丹梦, "面对心靈的“乡土”――论阎连科的『风雅颂』", 文藝爭鳴, (2) (2009)
  16. 梁鸿, "知识分子的庙堂之痛与民间之痒――读阎连科"风雅颂"", 文藝爭鳴, (10) (2008)
  17. 刘思谦, "當“学术”遭遇权力、金钱与性――阎连科『风雅颂』主人公杨科解读", 漢語言文學硏究, (2) (2011)
  18. 邵燕君, "荒诞还是荒唐、渎圣还是亵渎?――由阎连科『风雅颂』批评某种不良的写作倾向)", 文藝爭鳴, (10) (2008)
  19. 王文参, "當前文学对文化生态失衡的焦虑和救赎――读阎连科『风雅颂』和『我与父辈』", 小說評論, (6) (2011)
  20. 徐剛, "知識者的“逃離”與“回家”――讀閻連科『風雅頌』", 長江叢刊, (21) (2014)
  21. 张瑞杰, "『风雅颂』: 乡村知识分子的身份焦虑", 小說評論, (4) (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)