이화에 대한 통시적 접근과 유표제약-OCP의 비교
A Comparison between Dissimilation in Diachronic Approaches and OCP-Markedness Constraint
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is to consider dissimilation in a few words when two similar elements occur in adjacent position. Although there are varying views of what causes this dissimilation, the generally accepted point of view is that dissimilation occurs so as to provide for easy pronunciation. In this paper, I have considered the dissimilation in two aspects, one of which is based on diachronic approaches and the other within an OT framework. As for the diachronic methods, I have considered the analytic methods of SPE, Schane, Katamba, and Archiangeli & Pulleyblank, but these methods are not fully satisfactory in explaining this phenomenon. Within the OT framework, I have explained the dissimilation through a few constraints. Especially, in this point, OCP plays a key role in explaining the dissimilation. One interesting case is about circle>circular and particle>particular because the dissimilation occurs at two places within each word, circular and particular. Finally I have explained the dissimilation of these words satisfactorily by introducing the new constraints RMD and STW. Although the new proposed methods in this paper can explain the English dissimilation more satisfyingly than other existing approaches, they need to be developed so as to be more persuasive methods for explaining this phenomenon in other languages.
Abstract
This paper is to consider dissimilation in a few words when two similar elements occur in adjacent position. Although there are varying views of what causes this dissimilation, the generally accepted point of view is that dissimilation occurs so as to provide for easy pronunciation. In this paper, I have considered the dissimilation in two aspects, one of which is based on diachronic approaches and the other within an OT framework. As for the diachronic methods, I have considered the analytic methods of SPE, Schane, Katamba, and Archiangeli & Pulleyblank, but these methods are not fully satisfactory in explaining this phenomenon. Within the OT framework, I have explained the dissimilation through a few constraints. Especially, in this point, OCP plays a key role in explaining the dissimilation. One interesting case is about circle>circular and particle>particular because the dissimilation occurs at two places within each word, circular and particular. Finally I have explained the dissimilation of these words satisfactorily by introducing the new constraints RMD and STW. Although the new proposed methods in this paper can explain the English dissimilation more satisfyingly than other existing approaches, they need to be developed so as to be more persuasive methods for explaining this phenomenon in other languages.
참고문헌 (31)
- 구희산, "영어음성학" (1998), 한국문화사
- 전상범, "음운론" (2004), 서울대학교출판부
- 전상범, "영어음성학개론" (2005), 을류문화사
- 아케이언젤리,란게돈, "최적성이론" (1999), 한신문화사
- Alderete, J., "Dissimilation as local conjunction in In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 27" (1997), Amherst
- Alderete, J., "Dissimilation in grammar and the lexicon in The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology" (2007)
- Archiangeli, D., "Grounded phonology" (1994), MIT Press
- Blevins, J., "Evolution phonology" (2004), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Borowsky, T., "Topics in the lexical phonology of English", 박사, pp.1986
- Borowsky, T., "Antigemination in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.671~678 (1987)
- Chomsky, N., "The sound pattern of English" (1968), Harper and Row
- Clements, G. N., "Compensatory lengthening and consonant gemination in Luanda. In Wetzels, L. and Sezer, E. eds., studies in compensatory lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris, 37-76", ~ (1986)
- Fukazawa, H., "Theoretical implications of OCP effects on features in OT. ROA-307", ~ (1999)
- Holton , D., "Assimilation and dissimilation of Sundanese liquids, In J. Beckman, L. Dickey and S. Urbanczyk, eds., Papers in Optimality Theory: 167-180, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18", ~ (1995)
- It? J., "Rendaku I: Constraint conjunction and the OCP", Paper presented at Kobe Phonology Forum, Kobe, Japan (1996)
- It? J., "Structural economy and OCP interactions in local domains", Paper presented at Western Conference on Linguistics 1996, University of California, Santa Cruz. (1996)
- Katamba, F., "Introduction to phonology" (1989), Longman
- Lombardi, L., "Segmental phonology in optimality theory" (2001), Cambridge Univ. Press
- McCarthy, J., "OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.207~264 (1986)
- McCarthy, J., "A thematic guide to optimality theory" (2003), Amherst
- Myers, S., "OCP effects in optimality theory", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, pp.847~892 (1997)
- Odden, D., "Adjacency parameters in phonology", Language, 70, pp.289~330 (1994)
- Oh, K. Y., "Reanalysis of dissimilation in harmonic phonology", English Language & Literature Teaching, 8 (2002)
- Ohala, J. J., "The listener as a source of sound change", pp.178~203 (1981), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior
- Prince,A., "Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar" (1993), Rutgers University and University of Colorado at Boulder
- Roca, I., "Course in phonology" (1999), Black Well
- Schane, S. A., "Generative phonology" (1973), Prentice Hall
- Suzuki, K. A., "Typological investigation of dissimilation" (1998)
- Yip, M., "The obligatory contour principle and phonological rules: A Loss of Identity", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.65~100 (1988)
- Wehr,H., "A dictionary of modern written Arabic" (1971), Spoken language service
- Wolfram,W, "Phonological analysis: Focus on American" (1981), Prentice Hall