영어 역행 대명사
English Backward Pronouns
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to analyze English backward pronouns with the discourse-functional view of language after the survey of the syntactic approach. The purely structural approach to the backward pronouns cannot explain many backward anaphora phenomena because the backward pronoun is primarily a discourse-functional matter. Therefore, it should be analyzed in terms of discourse-functional factors which deal with linguistic communication. It is examined that there are some communicative factors in determining backward pronoun coreference. The discourse-functional factors of the backward pronouns discussed in this paper are as follows: firstly, the information concepts such as given and new information, theme and rhyme, and presupposition and assertion; secondly, the content of the sentence; thirdly, the tightness and looseness between main and subordinate clauses; finally, the reported ways of discourse such as direct discourse, indirect discourse, semi-indirect discourse, and point of views. This discourse-functional approach can capture the semantic-pragmatic properties of English backward pronouns and can solve some problems raised in the purely structural analysis. It is considered that the discourse-functional approach is useful and necessary for the determination of backward pronoun reference, but it is not a unified theory. So, a unified framework in which all the functional explanations are interrelated with each other will be the task to be further researched in the future.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze English backward pronouns with the discourse-functional view of language after the survey of the syntactic approach. The purely structural approach to the backward pronouns cannot explain many backward anaphora phenomena because the backward pronoun is primarily a discourse-functional matter. Therefore, it should be analyzed in terms of discourse-functional factors which deal with linguistic communication. It is examined that there are some communicative factors in determining backward pronoun coreference. The discourse-functional factors of the backward pronouns discussed in this paper are as follows: firstly, the information concepts such as given and new information, theme and rhyme, and presupposition and assertion; secondly, the content of the sentence; thirdly, the tightness and looseness between main and subordinate clauses; finally, the reported ways of discourse such as direct discourse, indirect discourse, semi-indirect discourse, and point of views. This discourse-functional approach can capture the semantic-pragmatic properties of English backward pronouns and can solve some problems raised in the purely structural analysis. It is considered that the discourse-functional approach is useful and necessary for the determination of backward pronoun reference, but it is not a unified theory. So, a unified framework in which all the functional explanations are interrelated with each other will be the task to be further researched in the future.
참고문헌 (30)
- 문용, "고급 영문법 해설" (2003), 박영사
- 박승윤, "기능문법론" (1990), 한신문화사
- 장석진, "영문법개론Ⅱ" (1987), 신아사
- 한학성, "생성문법론" (1995), 태학사
- Bickerton, D., "Some assertions about presupposition about pronominalization in : Parasession on Functionalism", pp.24~35 (1975), Chicago Linguistic Society
- Bolinger, D., "Pronouns and Repeated Nouns in : Indiana University Linguistic Club" (1977), Bloomington
- Bolinger, D., "Pronouns in Discourse", Syntax and Semantics, 12, pp.289~309 (1979)
- Carden, G., "Backward anaphora in discourse context", Journal of Linguistics, 18, pp.361~387 (1982)
- Chafe, W., "Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view in : Subject and topic", pp.25~55 (1976), Academic Press
- Chomsky, N., "On Binding", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.1~46 (1980)
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures On Government and Binding" (1981), Foris Publications
- Firbas, J., "Non-thematic Subjects in Contemporary English", Travux Linguistic de Praque, 2, pp.287~313 (1966)
- Hestvik, A., "LF Movement of pronouns and Antisubject Orientation", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.557~594 (1992)
- Katada, F., "The LF Representation of Anaphors", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.287~313 (1991)
- Kuno, S., "Pronominalization, Reflexivization and Direct discourse", Linguistic Inquiry, 3, pp.161~195 (1972)
- Kuno, S., "Functional Syntax" (1987), Chicago University Press
- Lakoff, George, "Pronouns and Reference in : Notes from the Linguistic Underground", pp.275~336 (1976), Academic Press
- Lakoff, Robin, "If's, and's and but's about conjunction in : Studies in Linguistic Semantics", pp.115~150 (1971)
- Langacker, R. W., "On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command in : Modern Studies in English, Englewood Cliffs", pp.160~186 (1969), Prentice-Hall
- langendoen, D., "The study of syntax" (1969)
- Lasnik, H., "Remarks on Coreference", Linguistic Analysis, 2(1), pp.1~22 (1980)
- Lees, R. B., "Rules for English Pronominalization", Language, 39, pp.145~159 (1963)
- Levinson, "Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited", Journal of Linguistics, 23, pp.107~161 (1991)
- MacCray, A., "The Semantics of Backward Anaphora in : Proceeding of the tenth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society", pp.329~343 (1980)
- Mittwoch, A., "Backward Anaphora and Discourse Structure", Journal of Pragmatics, 7, pp.129~139 (1983)
- Petrovitz, W., "The effect of discourse factors on backward anaphora", Word, 47, pp.1~12 (1996)
- Reinhart, T., "The syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Doctoral Dissertation" (1976), MIT
- Reinhart, T., "Definite NP Anaphora and C-Command Domains", Linguistic Inquiry, 12(4), pp.605~635 (1981)
- Reinhart, T., "Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation" (1983), The University of Chicago Press
- Westergaard, M. R., "Definite NP Anaphora: A Pragmatic Approach" (1986), Norwegian University Press