A Study of Supportive Moves on Request for Korean EFL Students
2
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate pragmatic competence on request for Korean college learners. 175 college students were divided into two groups by the test score of English: low level(81) and high level(94). Ten DCT items on request were provided for the students and written down the answers in each situation. Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Patterns(CCSARP) coding scheme was used for written responses of request sequences. This study analyzed supportive moves in various aspects. Although the learners used the grounder strategy, they also used the apology strategy as a higher rate. They also made use of the different supportive moves such as disarmer, imposition minimizer, sweeter, preparatory, promise of reward, etc. The frequency rate of other eight strategies except grounder strategy was somewhat different depending on the levels. Most learners in low and high level heavily skewed to the grounder because of their lack of the pragmatic abilities. The findings imply that the teachers in EFL classroom should teach the supportive strategies of request by means of real data.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate pragmatic competence on request for Korean college learners. 175 college students were divided into two groups by the test score of English: low level(81) and high level(94). Ten DCT items on request were provided for the students and written down the answers in each situation. Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Patterns(CCSARP) coding scheme was used for written responses of request sequences. This study analyzed supportive moves in various aspects. Although the learners used the grounder strategy, they also used the apology strategy as a higher rate. They also made use of the different supportive moves such as disarmer, imposition minimizer, sweeter, preparatory, promise of reward, etc. The frequency rate of other eight strategies except grounder strategy was somewhat different depending on the levels. Most learners in low and high level heavily skewed to the grounder because of their lack of the pragmatic abilities. The findings imply that the teachers in EFL classroom should teach the supportive strategies of request by means of real data.
참고문헌 (19)
- Blum-Kulka, S., "Learning to say what you mean in a second language in A study of the speech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language", Applied Linguistics, 3(1), pp.29~59 (1982)
- Blum-Kulka, S,, "Interpreting and performing speech acts in a second language-a cross-cultural study of Hebrew and English", Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, pp.36~55 (1983), Newbury House
- Blum-Kulka, S,, "The CCSARP coding manual", Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies, pp.273~294 (1989), Ablex
- Blum-Kulk,. S., "Too many words in Length of utterance and pragmatic failure.Studies in Second Language", Acquisition, 8, pp.165~180 (1986)
- Ellis, R., "The Study of Second Language Acquisition" (1994), Oxford University Press
- Faerch, C., "Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization", Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies, pp.221~247 (1989), Ablex
- Hassall, T., "Requests by Australian learners of Indonesian", 박사, pp.1997
- House, J., "Interlanguage pragmatics:Requesting in a foreign language.In W.Loerscher,& R.Schulze,(Eds.),Perspectives on language in performance(pp", Perspectives on language in performance, pp.1250~1288 (1987), Narr
- House, J., "Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a second language.Studies in Second Language", Acquisition, (18), pp.225~252 (1996)
- Kasper, G., "Pragmatics in language teaching" (2001), Cambridge University Press.
- Kim, J., "Could you calm down more? in Requests and Korean ESL learners.Working Papers in Educational Linguistics", Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, (2), pp.67~82 (1995)
- Koike, D.A., "Pragmatic competence and adult L2 acquisition in Speech acts in interlanguage.The Modern Language", The Modern Language Journal, (73), pp.79~89 (1989)
- Rose, K., "An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (22), pp.27~67 (2000)
- Shinn, H., "A survey of sociolinguistic studies in Korea", International Journal of the Sociology of Language, (82), pp.7~23 (1990)
- Suh, J., "ESL Korean learners' use of external and internal modifications in request realizations ED, 430-400", ~ (1999)
- Takahashi, S., "Cross-linguistic injuence in indirectness:The case of English directives performed by native Japanese speakers.Unpublished manuscript. Department of English as a Second Language,University of Hawaii at Manoa ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.D 370-439", ~ (1989)
- Takahashi, T., "The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English", JALT Journal, (8), pp.131~155 (1987)
- Takahashi,T., "Pragmatic transferability of Ll indirect request strategies perceived by Japanese learners of English", 박사, pp.1995
- Takahashi, S., "Pragmatic transferability.Studies in Second Language", Acquisition, 18(2), pp.189~223 (1996)