후분양제의 도입 필요성과 도입 방안

Abstract

>A lotting-out system before completion is not an option matter but a compulsory matter because there are no substitute goods for a lotting-out apartment before completion in the lotting-out housing market led by suppliers. This means that a lotting-out system after completion can be introduced not by market mechanism but only by a law. The greater part of positive effects in a lotting-out system before completion which some scholars insist seems to be induced from prejudiced vision for suppliers. Yet they have to consider both sides in the effects of the system because the positive effects might be negative effects to consumers. Also, they have to suggest a solution to problems such as weighting of troubled facts, incurring of structural disequilibrium in supply and demand, and consumer's loss derived from seller's market that the system has. They are against or worry about the introduction of a lotting-out system after completion pointing out negative effects. However, most of negative effects which they indicate seems to be induced from prejudiced vision for suppliers, too much arbitrary interpretation, or overlooking of market's control ability. Needless to say the system will weight much more the burden of financial costs to house suppliers. Therefore, to mitigate the burden of financial costs, the government should be ready for complementary measures such as a phase-in of the a lotting-out system after completion, the introduction of the system in land developed by the public groups, and activation of supplier finance.