The Comparison of Central and Mean True-Net Power (Pentacam) in Calculating IOL-Power After Refractive Surgery
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To compare the accuracy of central true net corneal power (cTNP) and mean true net corneal power (mTNP) of the Pentacam system to give a keratometry (K) reading for calculating IOL (intraocular lens) power in eyes following refractive surgery. Methods: Refraction, an automated K-reading (Km), cTNP and mTNP were measured for 15 eyes that required cataract surgery and had previously undergone refractive surgery. The difference between postoperative manifest refraction values and target refraction values calculated with the SRK/T formula using cTNP were compared with the one using mTNP. Results: The mean deviation from the desired post-cataract refractive outcome was 0.60 diopter (D) ±0.47 (standard deviation) using cTNP; 0.75±0.54 using mTNP (p=0.386). The actual refraction was within ±0.50D of the intended refraction for 60% (cTNP) and 33.3% (mTNP) of eyes, and within ±1.00D for 93% (cTNP) and 66.7% (mTNP) of eyes. Conclusions: Although not statistically significant, the cTNP showed better accuracy than mTNP to give a keratometry (K) reading for post-refractive surgery eyes requiring cataract surgery.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the accuracy of central true net corneal power (cTNP) and mean true net corneal power (mTNP) of the Pentacam system to give a keratometry (K) reading for calculating IOL (intraocular lens) power in eyes following refractive surgery. Methods: Refraction, an automated K-reading (Km), cTNP and mTNP were measured for 15 eyes that required cataract surgery and had previously undergone refractive surgery. The difference between postoperative manifest refraction values and target refraction values calculated with the SRK/T formula using cTNP were compared with the one using mTNP. Results: The mean deviation from the desired post-cataract refractive outcome was 0.60 diopter (D) ±0.47 (standard deviation) using cTNP; 0.75±0.54 using mTNP (p=0.386). The actual refraction was within ±0.50D of the intended refraction for 60% (cTNP) and 33.3% (mTNP) of eyes, and within ±1.00D for 93% (cTNP) and 66.7% (mTNP) of eyes. Conclusions: Although not statistically significant, the cTNP showed better accuracy than mTNP to give a keratometry (K) reading for post-refractive surgery eyes requiring cataract surgery.
참고문헌 (26)
- Gimbel H, "Refractive error in cataract surgery after previous refractive surgery", J Cataract Refract Surg, 26, pp.142~144 (2000)
- Holladay JT, "Intraocular lens power calculations for the refractive surgeon", Oper Tech Cataract Refract Surg, 1, pp.105~117 (1996)
- Ishikawa T, "Trial for new intraocular lens power calculation following phototherapeutic keratectomy", Jpn J Ophthalmol, 44, pp.400~406 (2000)
- Aramberri J, "Intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery: double-K method", J Cataract Refract Surg, 29, pp.2063~2068 (2003)
- Maeda N, "Disparity between keratometry-style readings and corneal power within the pupil after refractive surgery for myopia", Cornea, 16, pp.517~524 (1997)
- Kalski RS, "Intraocular lens power calculation for cataract surgery after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia", J Refract Surg, 13, pp.362~366 (1997)
- Seitz B, "Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery", J Refract Surg, 16, pp.349~361 (2000)
- Seitz B, "Intraocular lens calculations status after corneal refractive surgery", Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 11, pp.35~46 (2000)
- Gimbel HV, "Accuracy and predictability of intraocular lens power calculation after photorefractive keratectomy", J Cataract Refract Surg, 26, pp.1147~1151 (2000)
- Hugger P, "Comparison of changes in manifest refraction and corneal power after photorefractive keratectomy", Am J Ophthalmol, 129, pp.68~75 (2000)
- Gimbel HV, "Accuracy and predictability of intraocular lens power calculation after laser in situ keratomileusis", J Cataract Refract Surg, 27, pp.571~576 (2001)
- Hamilton DR, "Cataract surgery in patients with prior refractive surgery", Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 14, pp.44~53 (2003)
- Holladay JT, "Consultations in refractive surgery", Refract Corneal Surg, 5, pp.203~ (1989)
- Feiz V, "Intraocular lens power calculation after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and hyperopia: a standardized approach", Cornea, 20, pp.792~797 (2001)
- Walter KA, "Accurate intraocular lens power calculation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis, bypassing corneal power", J Cataract Refract Surg, 32, pp.425~429 (2006)
- 강재훈, "굴절교정수술후 인공수정체도수계산을 위한 새로운 각막곡률치 측정방법", 대한안과학회지, 46(5), pp.859~864 (2005), 대한안과학회
- Zeh WG, "Comparison of contact lens overrefraction and standard keratometry for measuring corneal curvature in eyes with lenticular opacity", J Cataract Refract Surg, 25, pp.898~903 (1999)
- Grzybowski DM, "Model for nonectatic increase in posterior corneal elevation after ablative procedures", J Cataract Refract Surg, 31, pp.72~81 (2005)
- Twa MD, "Response of the posterior corneal surface to laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia", J Cataract Refract Surg, 31, pp.61~71 (2005)
- Koch DD, "Refractive complications of cataract surgery after radial keratotomy", Am J Ophthalmol, 108, pp.676~682 (1989)
- Seitz B, "Unerestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy", Ophthalmology, 106, pp.693~702 (1999)
- Masket S, "Simple regression formula for intraocular lens power adjustment in eyes requiring cataract surgery after excimer laser photoablation", J Cataract Refract Surg, 32, pp.430~434 (2006)
- Wang Z, "Posterior corneal surface topographic changes after laser in situ keratomileusis are related to residual corneal bed thickness", Ophthalmology, 106, pp.406~409 (1999)
- Seitz B, "Posterior corneal curvature changes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis", Ophthalmology, 108, pp.666~672 (2001)
- Gobbi PG, "Keratometric index, videokeratography, and refractive surgery", J Cataract Refract Surg, 24, pp.202~211 (1998)
- Hoffer KJ, "The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas", J Cataract Refract Surg, 19, pp.700~712 (1993)
