Refractive Predictability between Standard and Total Keratometry during the Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery with Monofocal Intraocular Lens with Enhanced Intermediate Function
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: We aimed to compare the accuracy of the intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula using the standard keratometry (K) and total K (TK) during the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with a monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function using currently used formulas. Methods: A retrospective review of 125 eyes from 125 patients who had undergone FLACS with implantation of monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function was conducted. The predicted refractive power was calculated using an optical biometer (IOLmaster 700) according to the K and TK in the Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Haigis, and Holladay 2 formulas. Absolute prediction error (APE) obtained from the actual postoperative refractive outcomes and the refractive error predicted in each formula was compared one month after surgery. Results: Mean APE ranged between 0.29 and 0.39 diopters (D) regardless of the calculation formula and the method of measuring corneal curvature. Significant differences were observed in the APE from the four formulas and the two keratometric measurements (p = 0.014). In a total of 125 eyes from 125 patients, the mean APE was lowest with the Barrett Universal II formula. Across all formulas, both the mean APE and the median APE tended to be lower for K than for TK, although there was no significant difference. Approximately 70% to 80% of the patients were included within 0.5 D of the refractive error across all formulas. The percentage of eyes within 0.5 D of APE outcomes was not statistically different between the K and TK data when using each formula. Conclusions: Keratometric measurements considering the poster corneal curvature did not show any additional advantages when implanting the monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function during the FLACS.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to compare the accuracy of the intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula using the standard keratometry (K) and total K (TK) during the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with a monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function using currently used formulas. Methods: A retrospective review of 125 eyes from 125 patients who had undergone FLACS with implantation of monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function was conducted. The predicted refractive power was calculated using an optical biometer (IOLmaster 700) according to the K and TK in the Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Haigis, and Holladay 2 formulas. Absolute prediction error (APE) obtained from the actual postoperative refractive outcomes and the refractive error predicted in each formula was compared one month after surgery. Results: Mean APE ranged between 0.29 and 0.39 diopters (D) regardless of the calculation formula and the method of measuring corneal curvature. Significant differences were observed in the APE from the four formulas and the two keratometric measurements (p = 0.014). In a total of 125 eyes from 125 patients, the mean APE was lowest with the Barrett Universal II formula. Across all formulas, both the mean APE and the median APE tended to be lower for K than for TK, although there was no significant difference. Approximately 70% to 80% of the patients were included within 0.5 D of the refractive error across all formulas. The percentage of eyes within 0.5 D of APE outcomes was not statistically different between the K and TK data when using each formula. Conclusions: Keratometric measurements considering the poster corneal curvature did not show any additional advantages when implanting the monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function during the FLACS.
참고문헌 (32)
- Song JH, "Time series changes in cataract surgery in Korea", Korean J Ophthalmol, 32, pp.182~189 (2018)
- Chung JK, "Cataract surgery practices in the Republic of Korea : a survey of the Korean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2018", Korean J Ophthalmol, 33, pp.451~457 (2019)
- Savini G, "An analysis of the factors influencing the residual refractive astigmatism after cataract surgery with toric intraocular lenses", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 56, pp.827~835 (2015)
- Koch DD, "Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism", J Cataract Refract Surg, 38, pp.2080~2087 (2012)
- Akman A, "Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700with the IOLMaster 500", Br J Ophthalmol, 100, pp.1201~1205 (2016)
- Fabian E, "Prediction accuracy of total keratometry compared to standard keratometry using different intraocular lens power formulas", J Refract Surg, 35, pp.362~368 (2019)
- Kern C, "Comparing refractive outcomes of a standard industry toric IOL calculator using anterior corneal astigmatism and total corneal refractive power", Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 258, pp.345~350 (2020)
- Bellucci R, "Multifocal intraocular lenses", Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 16, pp.33~37 (2005)
- Dick HB, "Accommodative intraocular lenses : current status", Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 16, pp.8~26 (2005)
- Mencucci R, "Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens", Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 256, pp.1913~1922 (2018)
- Tognetto D, "Surface profiles of new-generation IOLs with improved intermediate vision", J Cataract Refract Surg, 46, pp.902~906 (2020)
- Mencucci R, "Visual outcome, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with a new monofocal IOL, enhanced for intermediate vision: preliminary results", J Cataract Refract Surg, 46, pp.378~387 (2020)
- Ferreira TB, "Comparison of methodologies using estimated or measured values of total corneal astigmatism for toric intraocular lens power calculation", J Refract Surg, 33, pp.794~800 (2017)
- Iijima K, "Comparison of predictability using Barrett universal II and SRK", T formulas according to keratometry, 2020, pp.2020, 7625725~
- Abulafia A, "Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods", J Cataract Refract Surg, 41, pp.548~556 (2015)
- Zhang Y, "Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes", J Ophthalmol, 2016, pp.1917268~ (2016)
- Lundstrom M, "Risk factors for refractive error after cataract surgery : analysis of 282 811cataract extractions reported to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery", J Cataract Refract Surg, 44, pp.447~452 (2018)
- Unsal U, "Comparison of new monofocal innovative and standard monofocal intraocular lens af ter phacoemulsification", Int Ophthalmol, 41, pp.273~282 (2021)
- Kang KH, "Visual performance and optical quality after implantation of a new generation monofocal intraocular lens", Korean J Ophthalmol, 35, pp.112~119 (2021)
- Auffarth GU, "Clinical evaluation of a new monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function in patients with cataract", J Cataract Refract Surg, 47, pp.184~191 (2021)
- Cochener B, "Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens : International Multicenter Concerto Study", J Cataract Refract Surg, 42, pp.1268~1275 (2016)
- Kane JX, "Intraocular lens power formulas, biometry, and intraoperative aberrometry: a review", Ophthalmology, 128, pp.e94~e114 (2021)
- Olsen T, "On the calculation of power from curvature of the cornea", Br J Ophthalmol, 70, pp.152~154 (1986)
- LaHood BR, "Measurement of posterior corneal astigmatism by the IOLMaster 700", J Refract Surg, 34, pp.331~336 (2018)
- Chung HS, "Comparing prediction accuracy between total keratometry and conventional keratometry in cataract surgery with refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation", Sci Rep, 11, pp.19234~ (2021)
- Lee H, "Prediction accuracy of standard and total keratometry by swept-source optical biometer for multifocal intraocular lens power calculation", Sci Rep, 11, pp.4794~ (2021)
- Ryu S, "Prediction accuracy of conventional and total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery", Sci Rep, 11, pp.12869~ (2021)
- Srivannaboon S, "Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery", Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 257, pp.2677~2682 (2019)
- Charlesworth E, "When is refraction stable following routine cataract surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis", Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 40, pp.531~539 (2020)
- Ostri C, "Automated refraction is stable 1 week after uncomplicated cataract surgery", Acta Ophthalmol, 96, pp.149~153 (2018)
- McNamara P, "Refractive stability following uncomplicated cataract surgery", Clin Exp Optom, 102, pp.154~159 (2019)
- Lawless M, "Outcomes of femtosecond laser cataract surgery with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens", J Refract Surg, 28, pp.859~864 (2012)