Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses?
3
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control. Results: The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter. Conclusions: Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control. Results: The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter. Conclusions: Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism.
참고문헌 (23)
- Hoffer KJ, "Biometry of 7,500 cataractous eyes", Am J Ophthalmol, 90, pp.360~368 (1980)
- Ninn-Pedersen K, "Cataract patients in a defined Swedish population 1986-1990. II. Preoperative observations", Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh), 72, pp.10~15 (1994)
- Mendicute J, "Foldable toric intraocular lens for astigmatism correction in cataract patients", J Cataract Refract Surg, 34, pp.601~607 (2008)
- Weinand F, "Rotational stability of a single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: new method for high-precision rotation control", J Cataract Refract Surg, 33, pp.800~803 (2007)
- Bauer NJ, "Astigmatism management in cataract surgery with the AcrySof toric intraocular lens", J Cataract Refract Surg, 34, pp.1483~1488 (2008)
- Horn JD, "Status of toric intraocular lenses", Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 18, pp.58~61 (2007)
- Dardzhikova A, "Early experience with the AcrySof toric IOL for the correction of astigmatism in cataract surgery", Can J Ophthalmol, 44, pp.269~273 (2009)
- Ruiz-Mesa R, "Refractive lens exchange with foldable toric intraocular lens", Am J Ophthalmol, 147, pp.990~996 (2009)
- Mendicute J, "Toric intraocular lens versus opposite clear corneal incisions to correct astigmatism in eyes having cataract surgery", J Cataract Refract Surg, 35, pp.451~458 (2009)
- Davies LN, "Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001", Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor, 2003, pp.80, 320~324
- Gonzalez-Meijome JM, "A comparison of the ARK-700A autokeratometer and Medmont E300 corneal topographer when measuring peripheral corneal curvature", Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 24, pp.391~398 (2004)
- Sheppard AL, "Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref", Keratometer WAM-5500, 2010, pp.30, 143~151
- Shankar H, "Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements", J Cataract Refract Surg, 34, pp.103~113 (2008)
- Connors R 3rd, "Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry", J Cataract Refract Surg, 28, pp.235~238 (2002)
- 최재혁, "IOL Master로 측정된 생체 계수의 재현성과 정확성", 대한안과학회지, 45(10), pp.10~10 (2004), 대한안과학회
- Vogel A, "Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability", J Cataract Refract Surg, 27, pp.1961~1968 (2001)
- Haigis W, "Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis", Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 238, pp.765~773 (2000)
- Goyal R, "Comparison of laser interferometry and ultrasound A-scan in the measurement of axial length", Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 81, pp.331~335 (2003)
- 김효진, "IOL Master, A-scan과 Orbscan Ⅱ를 이용한 안축장과 전방깊이의 비교", 대한안과학회지, 44(7), pp.8~1527 (2003), 대한안과학회
- 김성모, "Refractive Predictability of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Factors that can Affect It", Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, 23(1), pp.6~12 (2009), 대한안과학회
- Ahmed II, "Visual function and patient experience after bilateral implantation of toric intraocular lenses", J Cataract Refract Surg, 36, pp.609~616 (2010)
- Statham M, "Comparison of the AcrySof SA60 spherical intraocular lens and the AcrySof Toric SN60T3 intraocular lens outcomes in patients with low amounts of corneal astigmatism", Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 37, pp.775~779 (2009)
- Husain SE, "Computerized videokeratography and keratometry in determining intraocular lens calculations", J Cataract Refract Surg, 22, pp.362~366 (1996)