월튼의 변증법적 논증론의 형사소송법적 함의
The Implication for a Criminal Procedure of the Dialectical Argumentation Theory of Douglas Walton
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is aimed at presenting fundamental elements on argument schemes of Douglas Walton and analyzes especially the method of persuasion dialog, argumentation diagramming and plausible argumentation. According to Douglas Walton, the purpose of his book, “Legal Argumentation and Evidence”, is to provide a new method for analyzing the structure of legal reasoning used in arguing a case and evaluation legal argumentation in general. Walton has especially emphasized that his new viewpoint is different from the traditional approaches of deductive and inductive logic because it examines legal argumentation contextually. In the Walton’s new model of argumentation presented here, the form of the argument, argumentation scheme is merely one factor in judging its worth. How the argument is used in a specific context of conversation is also crucially important. We believe that this method of dialectical argumentation of Douglas Walton will turn out to be of vitally important practical utility, both in theoretical development of criminal procedure and in tools for supporting real argumentation in criminal court of jury trial in Korea.
Abstract
This paper is aimed at presenting fundamental elements on argument schemes of Douglas Walton and analyzes especially the method of persuasion dialog, argumentation diagramming and plausible argumentation. According to Douglas Walton, the purpose of his book, “Legal Argumentation and Evidence”, is to provide a new method for analyzing the structure of legal reasoning used in arguing a case and evaluation legal argumentation in general. Walton has especially emphasized that his new viewpoint is different from the traditional approaches of deductive and inductive logic because it examines legal argumentation contextually. In the Walton’s new model of argumentation presented here, the form of the argument, argumentation scheme is merely one factor in judging its worth. How the argument is used in a specific context of conversation is also crucially important. We believe that this method of dialectical argumentation of Douglas Walton will turn out to be of vitally important practical utility, both in theoretical development of criminal procedure and in tools for supporting real argumentation in criminal court of jury trial in Korea.
참고문헌 (20)
- Walton, "Legal Argumentation and Evidence" (2002), The Pennsylvania State University
- 오형엽, "이성의 수사학", pp.215~216
- Walton, "Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law", pp.115~ (2006), Springer
- Verheij, "Book Review", Artificial Intelligence and Law, 9, pp.305~307 (2001)
- 김성룡, "법적 논증의 기초", pp.186~ (2006), 경북대학교 출판부
- 최훈, "사람에의 호소는 오류인가?", 논리연구, 6(1) (2003), 한국논리학회
- Abimbola, "Abductive Reasoning in Law: Taxonomy and inference to the best explanation", Cardozo Law Review, pp.1683~ (2001)
- Schum, "Species of abductive reasoning in fact investigation in law", Cardozo Law Review, pp.1645~ (2001)
- 이상하, "개연적 판단: 논증과 추론", 범한철학, 39(4), pp.203~233 (2005), 범한철학회
- 권기훈, "형사소송에 있어서 올바른 증인신문 방법, In 사실인정 방법론의 정립 형사재판편", pp.332~
- Ruth Amossy, "담화 속의 논증", pp.33~
- 박준호, "비형식 논리학의 논증과 논증 평가 개념", 범한철학, 34(3), pp.151~175 (2004), 범한철학회
- Jacobs, "Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics", Argumentation, 14, pp.261~ (2000)
- 손장권, "수사학과 변증법의 위상변화에 관한 연구", 민족문화연구, (44), pp.359~418 (2006), 민족문화연구원
- Blair, "The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument", Argumentation, 12, pp.337~338 (1998)
- Crosswhite, "이성의 수사학 - 글쓰기와 논증의 매력", pp.216~217 (2001), 고려대학교출판부
- Reed, "Argumentation schemes in dialogue, In Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground", pp.1~11 (2007), Windsor
- Prakken, "Argumentation Schemes and Burden of Proof", Working Notes of the 4th. International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, Valencia, pp.1~ (2004)
- Grice, "Logic and Con- versation, In Logic of Grammer", pp.64~75 (1975)
- Schum, "Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning", 87~89 (1994)