법적 논증의 기초 ―대법원 판결과 페렐만의 신수사학
Foundation of Legal Argumentation - Perelman’s New Rhetoric and Cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As issues and problems of civil societies become more complicated, the importance and necessity of democratic solutions with the help of debates and argumentations are emphasized. Surely there are great needs to develop various argumentation skills in modern societies, and this lays big burdens on legal education, and it's a matter of grave concern that legal education ought to fulfill obligations to meet such demands. However, it is a general opinion that korean judicial officers, including judges and lawyers lack on understandings of legal argumentations. But this study shows a quite different understanding. In the history of rhetoric, there has been a good many skills of argumentations, but this article reviewed major argumentation skills introduced by Chaїm Perelman, representative one who revivified rhetoric in 1950s, and collated corresponding Cases. This study proves there are abundant Cases to demonstrate close relationship between rhetorical legal argumentation theory and korean legal practice, and asserts Cases simply has not been given proper analysis in basis of legal argumentation theory in rethorical tradition until now. In conclusion, rethoric is a valuable subject in the legal education because it has useful, profound contents for improving argumentation skills not to mention of legal reasoning.
Abstract
As issues and problems of civil societies become more complicated, the importance and necessity of democratic solutions with the help of debates and argumentations are emphasized. Surely there are great needs to develop various argumentation skills in modern societies, and this lays big burdens on legal education, and it's a matter of grave concern that legal education ought to fulfill obligations to meet such demands. However, it is a general opinion that korean judicial officers, including judges and lawyers lack on understandings of legal argumentations. But this study shows a quite different understanding. In the history of rhetoric, there has been a good many skills of argumentations, but this article reviewed major argumentation skills introduced by Chaїm Perelman, representative one who revivified rhetoric in 1950s, and collated corresponding Cases. This study proves there are abundant Cases to demonstrate close relationship between rhetorical legal argumentation theory and korean legal practice, and asserts Cases simply has not been given proper analysis in basis of legal argumentation theory in rethorical tradition until now. In conclusion, rethoric is a valuable subject in the legal education because it has useful, profound contents for improving argumentation skills not to mention of legal reasoning.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김광수, "논리와 비판적 사고" (2007), 철학과 현실사
- 김기영, "형법해석의 한계와 신수사학", 수사학, (9), pp.228~247 (2008), 한국수사학회
- 김상희, "법적 정의와 보편청중 - 페렐만의 신논증이론을 중심으로 -", 수사학, (9), pp.199~227 (2008), 한국수사학회
- 김성룡, "법적 논증론(Ⅰ)" (2009), 준커뮤니케이션즈
- 김영환, "법적 논증이론의 전개과정과 그 실천적 의의. in: 현대법철학의 흐름" (1996), 법문사
- 김욱동, "수사학이란 무엇인가" (2001), 민음사
- 김욱동, "은유와 환유" (1999), 민음사
- 김종률, "수사심리학" (2002), 학지사
- 박우수, "수사학과 문학" (1999), 동인
- 박우수, "인문과학의 수사학" (2003), 고려대학교출판부
- 아리스토텔레스, "RhetoricⅠ, The basic Works of Aristotle" (2001), The Modern Library
- 앨런 그로스, "과학의 수사학" (2007), 궁리
- 올리비에 르불, "수사학" (1999), 한길크레주
- 이계일, "수사학적 법이론의 관점에서 본 법적 논증의 구조", 법철학연구, 13(1), pp.35~88 (2010), 한국법철학회
- 이병덕, "논리적 추론과 증명" (2008), 이제이북스
- 장하늘, "글쓰기 표현사전" (2009), 다산북스
- 티모시 보셔스, "수사학 이론" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 페렐만, "The Realm of Rhetoric" (1982), University of Norte Dame
- 페렐만, "A Treatise on Argumentation-The New Rhetoric" (1969), University of Notre Dame Press
- 플라톤, "파이드로스" (2008), 문예출판사
- 필립 브르통, "논증의 역사" (2006), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 하병학, "‘학제적 의사소통학’으로서의 수사학 재정립을 위한 고전수사학과 현대 신수사학 조명", 수사학, (1), pp.201~221 (2004), 한국수사학회
- 하재홍, "고전수사학과 법적 논증술", 경기법학논총, (10) (2010), 경기대학교 법학연구소
- 호세 안토니오, "수사학의 역사" (2001), 문학과 지성사
- 홍종화, "논증과 토포이", 불어불문학연구, (54), pp.837~859 (2003), 한국불어불문학회
- C. 플래틴, "논증연구" (2003), 고려대학교출판부
- D. A. Russell, "The Orator’s Education" (2001), Harvard University Press
- E. Gunderson, "The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric" (2009), Cambridge University
- F. 하프트, "법 수사학" (2010), 고려대학교출판부
- G. Ueding, "수사학의 재탄생-계몽주의에서 현대까지" (2010), 고려대학교 출판부
- J. D. Williams, "An Introduction to Classical Rhetoric -Essential Readings" (2009), Wiley-Blackwell
- M. 메넬리, "페렐만의 신수사학-새로운 세기의 철학과 방법론" (2006), 고려대학교출판부
- R. Wardy, "The Birth of Rhetoric-Gorgias, Plato and their successors" (1996), Routledge
- T. Cole, "The Origine of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece" (1991), The Johns Hopkins University Press