개정형사소송법의 증거개시 조항에 대한 비판적 고찰
A Critical Review about Discovery of the Revised Korean Criminal Procedure Law of 2008
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Revised Korean Criminal Procedure Law of 2008 has a lot of adversarial features. One of the remarkable features is an adoption of Anglo-American style discovery and disclosure. In Part Ⅱ, I analyze the relationship between the constitutional court's decision of 1997 and the provision of newly revised criminal procedure law's discovery clauses. In Part Ⅲ of this article I explore the basic features of the provision of newly revised criminal procedure law's discovery clauses, and Part Ⅳ reviews various interpretational issues. Korea's new rule follows a global trend of expanded prosecutorial discovery in criminal cases. Prosecutors are bound, upon request, to disclose all exculpatory evidence that they are going to use at trial. This article addresses the provisions and ramifications of the new reciprocal criminal discovery rule in Korea. Although the rule provides for a “two-way street", its significance lies in its expansion of discovery by the criminal defendant. In Part Ⅴ, I tried to criticize legislative failures and flaws. A relevant discussion will be provided of the history of criminal discovery, development and present status of the rule in Korea, and a prediction of what Korean practitioners are now facing. In Part Ⅵ, I summarized my findings and proposes actions that police, prosecutors, and defense attorneys should take to ameliorate the problem. Above all, I concluded that the more strong sanctions for prosecution's violations of criminal discovery rules should be added.
Abstract
Revised Korean Criminal Procedure Law of 2008 has a lot of adversarial features. One of the remarkable features is an adoption of Anglo-American style discovery and disclosure. In Part Ⅱ, I analyze the relationship between the constitutional court's decision of 1997 and the provision of newly revised criminal procedure law's discovery clauses. In Part Ⅲ of this article I explore the basic features of the provision of newly revised criminal procedure law's discovery clauses, and Part Ⅳ reviews various interpretational issues. Korea's new rule follows a global trend of expanded prosecutorial discovery in criminal cases. Prosecutors are bound, upon request, to disclose all exculpatory evidence that they are going to use at trial. This article addresses the provisions and ramifications of the new reciprocal criminal discovery rule in Korea. Although the rule provides for a “two-way street", its significance lies in its expansion of discovery by the criminal defendant. In Part Ⅴ, I tried to criticize legislative failures and flaws. A relevant discussion will be provided of the history of criminal discovery, development and present status of the rule in Korea, and a prediction of what Korean practitioners are now facing. In Part Ⅵ, I summarized my findings and proposes actions that police, prosecutors, and defense attorneys should take to ameliorate the problem. Above all, I concluded that the more strong sanctions for prosecution's violations of criminal discovery rules should be added.
참고문헌 (38)
- 신동운, "신형사소송법", pp.651~657 (2007), 법문사
- 손동권, "형사소송법", pp.432~436 (2008), 세창출판사
- 배종대, "신형사소송법", pp.420~423 (2008), 홍문사
- 임동규, "형사소송법 제5판", pp.87~91 (2008), 법문사
- 정웅석, "형사소송법 전정제1판", pp.799~803 (2007), 대명출판사
- 이재상, "신형사소송법 제2판", pp.146~151 (2008), 박영사
- 백형구, "알기쉬운 형사소송법 제4판", pp.161~ (2007), 박영사
- Stephen A. Salzburg, "Discovery in Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice", pp.617~ (1983), Macmillan and Free Press
- Wayne R. Lafave, "Criminal Procedure 3rd ed", pp.909~954 (2000), West Group Publishing
- 성낙현, "사개추위안의 증거개시제도에 대한 검토", 제1회 동아시아 형사사법 국제학술회의 - 형사사법의 정비방안 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 조준현, "개정일본형사소송법의 공판중심주의와 우리형사소송법개정안의 공판중심주의 비교 소고", 법학논총 (2006), 숭실대학교 법학연구소
- 김현석, "공판준비절차와 증거개시제도의 운영", 형사실무법관연수자료집, ~ (2007)
- 박지현, "피고인의 공판전 증거개시·증거신청 의무와 진술거부권", 민주법학, (34), pp.297~326 (2007), 민주주의법학연구회
- 이완규, "개정 형사소송법상 증거개시 제도", 법학논총 (2007), 숭실대학교 법학연구소
- 이완규, "개정형사소송법상 증거개시 제도", 형사법의 신동향, (10), pp.1~68 (2007)
- 김종오, "미국의 형사증거공개제도", 형사법의 신동향, (10), pp.69~106 (2007)
- 이승련, "개정 형사소송법상의 증거개시제도", 법조, 57(2), pp.224~253 (2008), 법조협회
- 민영성, "형사증거개시제도의 바람직한 운용방향", 사법, 1(3), pp.3~37 (2008), 사법발전재단
- 최승록, "증거개시제도의 시행상 문제와 개선방안, In 형사재판의 쟁점과 과제", pp.7~55 (2008), 형사재판의 쟁점과 과제
- Stanley Z. Fisher, "SYMPOSIUM: THE PROSECUTOR'S ETHICAL DUTY TO SEEK EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE IN POLICE HANDS: LESSONS FROM ENGLAND", Fordham Law Review, 68, pp.1379~
- Erik Lillquist, "ALLEN CHAIR SYMPOSIUM: THE ROLE OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN AMERICA: REFLECTIONS, PERCEPTIONS, AND REFORM: ARTICLE: IMPROVING ACCURACY IN CRIMINAL CASES", University of Richmond Law Review, 41, pp.912~ (2007)
- Bloom, "Criminal Procedure Examples & Explanations 5th ed", pp.82~ (2007), Aspen Publisher
- 이완규, "개정 형사소송법상 증거개시 제도", 법학논총, pp.28~ (2007), 숭실대학교 법학연구소
- 김종오, "미국의 형사증거공개제도", 형사법의 신동향, (10), pp.69~106 (2007)
- 이완규, "개정형사소송법상 증거개시 제도", 형사법의 신동향, (10), pp.26~56 (2007)
- Robert P. Mosteller, "Discovery in Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice 2nd ed.", pp.538~ (2002), Macmillan and Free Press
- Richard G. Singer, "Criminal Procedure Ⅱ: From Bail To Jail", pp.85~86 (2005), Aspen Publishers
- Joshua Dressler, "Understanding Criminal Procedure V.2: Adjudication, 4th ed", pp.154~155 (2006), LexisNexis
- Richard G. Singer, "Criminal Procedure Ⅱ: From Bail To Jail", pp.86~ (2005), Aspen Publishers
- Wayne R. LaFave, "Criminal Procedure 3rd ed", pp.926~ (2000), West Group Publishing
- Richard G. Singer, "Criminal Procedure Ⅱ: From Bail To Jail", pp.85~ (2005), Aspen Publishers
- 이완규, "개정 형사소송법상 증거개시 제도", 법학논총, pp.29~ (2007), 숭실대학교 법학연구소
- 이완규, "개정형사소송법상 증거개시 제도", 형사법의 신동향, (10), pp.65~ (2007)
- 김종오, "미국의 형사증거공개제도", 형사법의 신동향, (10), pp.71~ (2007)
- 박지현, "피고인의 공판전 증거개시·증거신청 의무와 진술거부권", 민주법학, (34), pp.297~326 (2007), 민주주의법학연구회
- 신동운, "신형사소송법", pp.656~ (2007)
- "대법원 2008.9.25. 선고 2008도6985 판결", ~ (2008)
- Wayne R. Lafave, "Criminal Procedure 3rd ed", pp.928~929 (2000), West Group Publishing