야간주거침입절도죄의 실행의 착수시기
The Time of Commencement of Execution of Larceny committed by Trespassing into Dwelling at Night
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The time of commencement of execution of a crime can't be judged without considering occurring a danger on interests protected by law of constituent elements of a crime. Thus, the time of commencement of execution of a crime is when after some of the actions provided from constituent elements of a crime are initiated or a direct action for the realization of constituent elements of a crime is initiated, a danger on interests protected by law of constituent elements of a crime is occurred due to the actions. According to this standard judgment, the time of commencement of execution of larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night is not when a wrongdoer trespasses into dwelling at night, but when after he or she trespasses into dwelling at night, he or she looks for something to steal the property of the others, because the only time is when a danger on interests protected by law of larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night is occurred. In conclusion, because the action of the accused can't be recognized as commencement of execution of larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night, the Supreme Court's decision isn't right. Thus, the action of the accused isn't attempt(receiving a criminal penalty) of larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night, but preparation(not receiving a criminal penalty) of larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night.
Abstract
The time of commencement of execution of a crime can't be judged without considering occurring a danger on interests protected by law of constituent elements of a crime. Thus, the time of commencement of execution of a crime is when after some of the actions provided from constituent elements of a crime are initiated or a direct action for the realization of constituent elements of a crime is initiated, a danger on interests protected by law of constituent elements of a crime is occurred due to the actions. According to this standard judgment, the time of commencement of execution of larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night is not when a wrongdoer trespasses into dwelling at night, but when after he or she trespasses into dwelling at night, he or she looks for something to steal the property of the others, because the only time is when a danger on interests protected by law of larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night is occurred. In conclusion, because the action of the accused can't be recognized as commencement of execution of larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night, the Supreme Court's decision isn't right. Thus, the action of the accused isn't attempt(receiving a criminal penalty) of larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night, but preparation(not receiving a criminal penalty) of larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night.
참고문헌 (55)
- 권오걸, "형법총론" (2009), 형설출판사
- 권오걸, "형법각론" (2009), 형설출판사
- 김성돈, "형법총론" (2009), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 김성돈, "형법총론" (2009), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 김성천, "형법" (2009), 소진출판사
- 김일수, "한국형법 Ⅱ, 총론 하" (1997), 박영사
- 김일수, "형법총론" (2008), 박영사
- 김일수, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법총론" (2009), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법각론" (2008), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법총론" (2009), 홍문사
- 배종대, "형법각론" (2007), 홍문사
- 백원기, "미수론연구" (1995), 삼지원
- 손동권, "형법총론" (2006), 율곡출판사
- 손동권, "형법각론" (2006), 율곡출판사
- 신동운, "형법총론" (2009), 법문사
- 오영근, "형법총론" (2009), 박영사
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 이영란, (2008), 형설출판사
- 이영란, (2008), 형설출판사
- 이재상, "형법총론" (2009), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 이정원, "형법총론" (2002), 법지사
- 이정원, "형법각론" (2000), 법지사
- 이태언, "형법총론" (2009), 형설출판사
- 이태언, "형법각론" (2009), 형설출판사
- 이형국, "형법총론" (2007), 법문사
- 이형국, "형법각론" (2007), 법문사
- 임석원, "결과적 가중범의 쟁점" (2007), 한국학술정보(주)
- 임 웅, "형법총론" (2008), 법문사
- 임 웅, "형법각론" (2005), 법문사
- 정성근, "형법총론" (1998), 법지사
- 정성근, "형법총론" (2009), 삼지원
- 정성근, "형법각론" (2008), 삼지원
- 정영일, "형법총론" (2010), 박영사
- 정영, "형법각론" (2008), 박영사
- 정웅석, "형법강의" (2008), 대명출판사
- 진계호, "형법총론" (2007), 대왕사
- 진계호, "형법각론" (2008), 대왕사
- 김경락, "특수강도죄의 실행의 착수시기", 성균관법학, 18(2), pp.369~392 (2006), 법학연구소
- 김경락, "방화죄의 기수시기", 중앙법학, 11(3), pp.495~529 (2009), 중앙법학회
- 김성룡, "‘형법상 결합범에 대한 입법론적 검토’에 대한 토론", 형사법연구, (22) (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 박강우, "추상적 위험의 개념과 위험의 추정", 형사법연구, (10) (1997), 한국형사법학회
- 박양빈, "실행의 착수. in: 석우차용석박사화갑기념논문집(상)" (1994), 법문사
- 백원기, "실행의 착수", 고시계 (1991), 국가고시학회
- 성낙현, "강도죄에서의 몇 가지 논점", 비교형사법연구, 5(1) (2003)
- 성시탁, "실행의 착수", 고시계 (1985), 국가고시학회
- 이순동, "실행의 착수시기", 재판자료, 49 (1990), 법원행정처
- 임석원, "결합범의 미수에 관한 문제점과 해석 및 정비방향", 형사정책연구, 20(2), pp.93~123 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 정영일, "절도죄에 있어서 실행의 착수시기", 형사판례연구, 2 (1994)
- 정행철, "추상적 위험범에 관한 연구", 동의법정, (10) (1994), 동의대학교 법정대학
- 한상훈, "결합범의 구조와 신분범과의 관계 - 준강도죄와 강도강간죄를 중심으로 -", 법조, 54(1), pp.96~133 (2005), 법조협회
- 한상훈, "형법상 결합범의 유형과 입법론적 검토", 형사법연구, (22) (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 한정환, "형법 제25조 제1항 '범죄실행의 착수'", 비교형사법연구, 8(1(2)), pp.125~152 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 홍영기, "특수강도죄의 실행의 착수시기 - 결합범과 실행 착수시기 도그마틱의 단순화", 성균관법학, 21(1), pp.417~440 (2009), 법학연구소