야간주거침입강도죄의 구조와 실행의 착수시기에 대한 비판적 검토
The Critical Study on the Structure of Robbery Trespassing upon residence at Night and Commencement of its Commission
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The korean criminal code §§334(1) are prescribed that a person who has trespassed at night and committed the robbery shall be punished by life imprisonment or by more than 5 year’s imprisonment. Recently, the commencement of commission of robbery of trespassing upon residence at night is disputable. Some argue that commencement of its commission is when an area of land and home that belongs to someone else is entered by someone with intent of robbery, some argue that commencement of its commission is when the force or the threat of immediate force are presented by someone trespassing upon residence at night. It is very important, how is understood the commencement of commission of robbery trespassing upon residence at night, because its scope are different, according to that. For example, its scope are more broad in case of the theory of trespassing upon residence than in case of the theory of force and threat. Of course, the opinion of majority and court is when the force or the threat of immediate force are presented by someone trespassing upon residence at night. The ground of disputable may be that we will understand commencement of its commission not according to the system of commencement of commission of robbery trespassing upon residence at night, but according to nature of robbery trespassing upon residence at night as combination crime, its character as robbery or benefit and protection of law of combination crime of robbery trespassing upon residence at night. The majority of scholars support the opinion of force and threat, the minority of them support the opinion of trespassing upon residence. And some people understand the 1st act of combination crime as commencement of commission of robbery of trespassing upon residence at night in case of supporting the combination crime, some people understand the 2nd act of combination as commencement of its commission in case of supporting its benefit and protection of law. When we reviewed this different result, we can result in that the result itself is wrong or its reasoning is wrong. Someone who will understand commencement of commission of robbery trespassing upon residence at night in respect of its character support the opinion of force and threat. We try to know the commencement of commission of robbery of tres- passing upon residence at night. If it is so, we have to understand the standard of deciding the commencement of commission of crime. However, until now, there have been many effort, to be studied commencement of its commission by the standard unrelated to the standard of commencement of commission of robbery of trespassing upon residence at night, for example, related to structure of combination crime of robbery trespassing upon residence at night, its character as robbery, and its benefit and protection of law. Even if until now, the definition of commencement of commission of crime have continuously been changed, nowadays the subjective-objective opinion as the eclectic opinion is supported by the opinion of majority and court. According to the eclectic opinion, the commencement of commission of crime is defined as when some or all act of constitution are commenced by the plan of crime actor. If the definition of commencement of commission of crime shall be applied to the structure of robbery trespassing upon residence at night, the commencement of commission of robbery trespassing upon residence at night is defined as when an area of land and home that belongs to someone else is entered by someone with intent of robbery. This is coinciding with the structure of commencement of commission of crime and requisite for robbery trespassing at night.
Abstract
The korean criminal code §§334(1) are prescribed that a person who has trespassed at night and committed the robbery shall be punished by life imprisonment or by more than 5 year’s imprisonment. Recently, the commencement of commission of robbery of trespassing upon residence at night is disputable. Some argue that commencement of its commission is when an area of land and home that belongs to someone else is entered by someone with intent of robbery, some argue that commencement of its commission is when the force or the threat of immediate force are presented by someone trespassing upon residence at night. It is very important, how is understood the commencement of commission of robbery trespassing upon residence at night, because its scope are different, according to that. For example, its scope are more broad in case of the theory of trespassing upon residence than in case of the theory of force and threat. Of course, the opinion of majority and court is when the force or the threat of immediate force are presented by someone trespassing upon residence at night. The ground of disputable may be that we will understand commencement of its commission not according to the system of commencement of commission of robbery trespassing upon residence at night, but according to nature of robbery trespassing upon residence at night as combination crime, its character as robbery or benefit and protection of law of combination crime of robbery trespassing upon residence at night. The majority of scholars support the opinion of force and threat, the minority of them support the opinion of trespassing upon residence. And some people understand the 1st act of combination crime as commencement of commission of robbery of trespassing upon residence at night in case of supporting the combination crime, some people understand the 2nd act of combination as commencement of its commission in case of supporting its benefit and protection of law. When we reviewed this different result, we can result in that the result itself is wrong or its reasoning is wrong. Someone who will understand commencement of commission of robbery trespassing upon residence at night in respect of its character support the opinion of force and threat. We try to know the commencement of commission of robbery of tres- passing upon residence at night. If it is so, we have to understand the standard of deciding the commencement of commission of crime. However, until now, there have been many effort, to be studied commencement of its commission by the standard unrelated to the standard of commencement of commission of robbery of trespassing upon residence at night, for example, related to structure of combination crime of robbery trespassing upon residence at night, its character as robbery, and its benefit and protection of law. Even if until now, the definition of commencement of commission of crime have continuously been changed, nowadays the subjective-objective opinion as the eclectic opinion is supported by the opinion of majority and court. According to the eclectic opinion, the commencement of commission of crime is defined as when some or all act of constitution are commenced by the plan of crime actor. If the definition of commencement of commission of crime shall be applied to the structure of robbery trespassing upon residence at night, the commencement of commission of robbery trespassing upon residence at night is defined as when an area of land and home that belongs to someone else is entered by someone with intent of robbery. This is coinciding with the structure of commencement of commission of crime and requisite for robbery trespassing at night.
참고문헌 (38)
- 권오걸, (2009), 헝설출판사
- 김기두, "판례교재 형법(각론)" (1979), 법문사
- 김성돈, "형법각론(제2판)" (2009), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 김일수, "한국형법Ⅲ" (1992), 박영사
- 김일수, "형법각론(제5판)" (2003), 박영사
- 김일수, "형법총론(제11판)" (2006), 박영사
- 김형준, "형법각론(제3판)" (2012), 소진
- 박상기, "형법각론(제9판)" (2012), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법총론(제9판)" (2012), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법각론(제8전정판)" (2013), 홍문사
- 배종대, "형법총론(제11판)" (2013), 홍문사
- 손동권, "형법각론(개정판)" (2005), 율곡출판사
- 신동운, "형법총론(제7판)" (2013), 법문사
- 오영근, "형법각론(제2판)" (2009), 박영사
- 오영근, "형법총론(제2판보정판)" (2012), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법각론(제9판)" (2013), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법총론(제7판)" (2013), 박영사
- 이정원, "형법각론" (2012), 신론사
- 임 웅, "형법각론(제7판)" (2013), 법문사
- 임 웅, "형법총론(제4정판)" (2012), 법문사
- 정성근, "형법각론" (2013), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 정영일, "형법각론(제3판)" (2011), 박영사
- 조준현, "형법각론(제3정판)" (2012), 법원사
- 진계호, "형법각론(제6판)" (2008), 대왕사
- 김경락, "특수강도죄의 실행의 착수시기", 성균관법학, 18(2), pp.369~392 (2006), 법학연구소
- 김봉수, "형법 제334조 제1항 ‘야간주거침입강도죄’의 실행착수 시기", 법학논총, 30(1), pp.157~175 (2010), 법학연구소
- 김성룡, "‘형법상 결합범에 관한 입법론적 검토’에 대한 토론문", 형사법연구, (22) (2004)
- 류부곤, "특수강도죄의 실행의 착수시기 - 결합범의 구조적 유형화에 기반한 모색 -", 비교형사법연구, 13(1), pp.73~94 (2011), 한국비교형사법학회
- 박달현, "준강도죄의 기수와 미수의 판단기준에 대한 검토", 형사법연구, (26), pp.697~710 (2006), 한국형사법학회
- 박동률, "소위 야간주거침입강도죄의 실행의 착수시기 -결합범인지 여부와 관련하여-", 법학논고, (26), pp.219~239 (2007), 법학연구원
- 성낙현, "강도죄에서의 몇 가지 논점", 비교형사법연구, 5(1) (2003)
- 여훈구, "특수강도죄의 실행의 착수시기", 형사판례연구, (7) (1999)
- 임석원, "結合犯의 本質과 不眞正 結果的 加重犯", 비교형사법연구, 8(1(2)), pp.175~200 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 최진갑, "대법원판례해설 제16호" (1992)
- 하태훈, "특수강도죄의 실행의 착수시기, 자의성과 자초위난", 고시계, 통권 : 488 (1997)
- 한상훈, "결합범의 구조와 신분범과의 관계 - 준강도죄와 강도강간죄를 중심으로 -", 법조, 54(1), pp.96~133 (2005), 법조협회
- 한상훈, "형법상 결합범의 유형과 입법론적 검토", 형사법연구, (22) (2004)
- 홍영기, "특수강도죄의 실행의 착수시기 - 결합범과 실행 착수시기 도그마틱의 단순화", 성균관법학, 21(1), pp.417~440 (2009), 법학연구소
