안락사 유형별 규범해석과 사회적 인식도
A Study on the Legal Analysis and Public Opinion Survey on Euthanasia
0
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We should discuss the choice of a terminally ill patient to seek medication that he or she could consume to bring about a peaceful and dignified death. Euthanasia means “good death”. The question that what is a good and approval death is indeed the difficult thing to define, and what makes it ethically worthwhile and important to discuss. Most of scholars of criminal law did not allow active euthanasia, that is a doctor to take the life of a patient who is suffering from an incurable disease and wants to die. But they allowed passive euthanasia and ‘letting die with dignity'. According to the principle of the autonomy the patient has a right to refuse a specific medicine even if the treatment is lifesaving. A living will would express the individual's desires regarding life support should he or she become incapacitated as a result of terminal illness. Another definition of physician assisted suicide provides that is usually involves a patient taking her own life with the help of a doctor. Most of scholars of criminal law don't approved the legalization of the right to physician-assisted dying. But a August 2005 national survey found that 79 percent of Koreans support the idea that when a person has a disease that can not be cured, doctors should be allowed to end the patient's life. Most people support the general idea of stopping medical treatment in suffering from an incurable disease. Also 71 percent of Koreans support that doctors should end treatment of patient who is suffering the terminal illness if his family request it. In view of the results so far achieved, this national survey was found to be similar to the Gallup's survey and Per Research Center survey on the American Public.
Abstract
We should discuss the choice of a terminally ill patient to seek medication that he or she could consume to bring about a peaceful and dignified death. Euthanasia means “good death”. The question that what is a good and approval death is indeed the difficult thing to define, and what makes it ethically worthwhile and important to discuss. Most of scholars of criminal law did not allow active euthanasia, that is a doctor to take the life of a patient who is suffering from an incurable disease and wants to die. But they allowed passive euthanasia and ‘letting die with dignity'. According to the principle of the autonomy the patient has a right to refuse a specific medicine even if the treatment is lifesaving. A living will would express the individual's desires regarding life support should he or she become incapacitated as a result of terminal illness. Another definition of physician assisted suicide provides that is usually involves a patient taking her own life with the help of a doctor. Most of scholars of criminal law don't approved the legalization of the right to physician-assisted dying. But a August 2005 national survey found that 79 percent of Koreans support the idea that when a person has a disease that can not be cured, doctors should be allowed to end the patient's life. Most people support the general idea of stopping medical treatment in suffering from an incurable disease. Also 71 percent of Koreans support that doctors should end treatment of patient who is suffering the terminal illness if his family request it. In view of the results so far achieved, this national survey was found to be similar to the Gallup's survey and Per Research Center survey on the American Public.
참고문헌 (50)
- 김완구, "안락사와 조력자살”, 탄생에서 죽음까지: 과학과 생명윤리", pp.352~ (2003), 서울:문예출판사
- 문국진, "생명윤리와 안락사", 113~ (1982)
- 김일수, "안락사문제의 실정법적 연구", 4(1), pp.177~ (1984)
- 허일태, "안락사에 관한 연구」, 한국형사정책연구원", 23~ (1994)
- 박영호, "소극적 안락사의 허용여부에 대한 소고", 저스티스, (65), pp.208~ (2002)
- 정현미, "안락사와 형법", 형사정책연구, 5(4), pp.183~ (1994)
- 이종원, "안락사의 윤리적 문제", 철학탐구, 21(21), pp.155~188 (2007), 중앙철학연구소
- 배종대, "형법각론", pp.70~ (2003), 홍문사
- 허일태, "존엄사에 대한 연구", 형사정책연구, 4(4), pp.52~ (1993)
- 김성천, "형법각론", pp.27~ (2006), 동현출판사
- Aaron Ridley, "Beginning Bioethics, Bedford", St.. Martin's, p.164; Bette-Jane Crigger (editor),「Cases in Bioethics」, Bedford, pp.1998, ~
- Furrow, "Greaney", Health Law, West Group, 2000, pp.878~
- 윤종행, "안락사와 입법정책", 비교형사법연구, 5(1), pp.460~
- David Orentlicher, "The Legalization of Physician Assisted Suicide: A very Modest Revolution”,「A Heath Law Reader-An Interdisciplinary Approach」, Carolina Academic Press", A Heath Law Reader-An Interdisciplinary Approach, 389~ (1999)
- R. Munson, "의료문제의 윤리적 성찰", pp.166~ (2001), 단국대학교 출판부
- Tom L. Beauchamp, "Principles of Biomedical Ethics", pp.148~ (2001), Oxford University Press
- Albert R. Jonsen, "The Birth of Bioethics", pp.259~261 (1998), Oxford University Press
- Peter Horn, "Clinical ethics Case book」, Wadsworth", 113~ (2003)
- Bette-Jane Crigger(editor), "Cases in Bioethics」, Bedford", St. Martine's, 1998, pp.292~
- 피터싱어, "실천윤리학", pp.177~180 (1991), 철학과 현실사
- 김정우, "서유럽의 안락사실태와 윤리적 전망", 가톨릭사상, (29), pp.375~ (2003)
- 한국의료윤리교육학회 편, "의료윤리학", pp.42~43 (2001), 계축문화사
- Jerry Menikoff, "Law and Bioeth ics", pp.269~ (2001), Georgetown University Press
- 김재봉, "치료중단과 소극적 안락사", 형사법연구, (12), pp.163~164 (1999)
- Bette-Jane Crigger(editor), "),「Cases in Bioethics」, Bedford", St. Martine's, 1998, pp.292~
- 이재상, "형법각론", pp.22~ (2003), 박영사
- 이형국, "형법각론", pp.20~ (2007), 법문사
- 전지연, "현행 형법에 따른 안락사의 허용여부에 대한 검토”, 명형식교수 화갑기념논문집", 163~ (1998)
- 이상돈, "의료형법", pp.212~ (1998), 법문사
- 김장한, "의료윤리 I", pp.161~163 (2003), 광연제출판사
- 김일수, "안락사 문제의 실정법적 연구”, 현대사회", 187~ (1984)
- 이재상, "안락사의 형태와 허용한계”, 김종원교수화갑기념논문집", 578~ (1991)
- 허일태, "안락사에 관한 연구”, 형법연구(I)", 436~
- 김성천, "형법각론", pp.28~ (2006), 동현출판사
- 오영근, "형법각론", pp.28~ (2004), 대명출판사
- 홍태석, "동해대학병원 안락사 사건을 통해 본 일본의 안락사에 대한 논의", 법학연구, 19, pp.265~
- 정성근, "형법각론", pp.24~ (2002), 삼지원
- John H. Robinson, "Physician Assisted Suicide: A Constitutional Crisis Resolved”, A Heath Law Reader -An Interdiciplinary Approach」, Carolina Academic Press", Carolina Academic Press, 422~423 (1999)
- 김동림, "안락사의 유형과 형법적 문제", 강원법학, 6, pp.169~
- 오영근, "형법각론", pp.28~ (2002), 대명출판사
- 이인영, "존엄사", 한림법학포럼, 14, pp.153~ (2004)
- 김기춘, "형법개론시론", pp.149~, 삼영사
- 임웅, "적극적 안락사의 비범죄화론”, 우범 이수성선생화갑기념논문집", pp.150~ (2000), 동성사
- 이재상, "안락사", 경희법학, 24(1), pp.67~
- 이형국, "안락사의 형법적 의미에 관한 소고”, 현대법학의 이론(이명구박사 화갑기념논문집", pp.508~509 (1996), 고시연구사
- 이상돈, "치료중단과 형사책임", pp.25~ (2002), 법문사
- 이상돈, "의료형법", 212~213
- 허일태, "인간적인 법을 찾아서", pp.143~ (1997), 세종출판사
- 손명세, "안락사 기준에 관한 국제비교연구", 의료·윤리·교육, 3(1) (2000), 제3권 제1호
- Ronald Dworkin, "Thomas Nagel", Robert Nozick, Thomas Scanlan, pp.Judith Jarvis,"Assisted Suicide:The Philosopher's Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents, A Heath Law Reader-An Interdiciplinary Approach[DOI]