존엄사에 관한 헌법적 검토
Constitutional Review of Death with Dignity
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Death with Dignity is distinguished from euthanasia as distinct concept,but often those two are used interchangeably. Especially in U.S.A, Death with Dignity Act is legalized physician-assisted suicide and Natural Death Act is legalized Death with Dignity. Thus the concept of Death with Dignity is carrying a lot of confusion, it is needed to establish a clear concept for this. In our country, Legislation on Death with Dignity doesn't have been performed yet. In this time, recent Supreme Court’s decision of withdrawal of life-sustaining care in terminal patient is a first judgement about the possibility of withdrawal of life-sustaining care in mature, terminal patient in the absence of specific legislation on this matter. The court’s decision is correct because we all respect the human dignity of the terminal patient. However, the Supreme Court’s decision allow withdrawal of terminal patient's life-sustaining care considering the substituted-judgement by guardian ad litem in the case of absence of advent medical directives of the patient, it has the risk of misuse and abuse of Death with dignity. Therefore, Death with Dignity Act should be enacted through legislation of living will or advance medical directive as soon as possible, Death with dignity shall be performed by specific and strict legal procedures of Death with Dignity Act.
Abstract
Death with Dignity is distinguished from euthanasia as distinct concept,but often those two are used interchangeably. Especially in U.S.A, Death with Dignity Act is legalized physician-assisted suicide and Natural Death Act is legalized Death with Dignity. Thus the concept of Death with Dignity is carrying a lot of confusion, it is needed to establish a clear concept for this. In our country, Legislation on Death with Dignity doesn't have been performed yet. In this time, recent Supreme Court’s decision of withdrawal of life-sustaining care in terminal patient is a first judgement about the possibility of withdrawal of life-sustaining care in mature, terminal patient in the absence of specific legislation on this matter. The court’s decision is correct because we all respect the human dignity of the terminal patient. However, the Supreme Court’s decision allow withdrawal of terminal patient's life-sustaining care considering the substituted-judgement by guardian ad litem in the case of absence of advent medical directives of the patient, it has the risk of misuse and abuse of Death with dignity. Therefore, Death with Dignity Act should be enacted through legislation of living will or advance medical directive as soon as possible, Death with dignity shall be performed by specific and strict legal procedures of Death with Dignity Act.
참고문헌 (19)
- 계희열, "헌법학(중)" (2004), 박영사
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2009), 법문사
- 박상기, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 성낙인, "헌법학" (2007), 법문사
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2009), 대명출판사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2003), 박영사
- 허 영, "한국헌법론" (2007), 박영사
- 고시면, "존엄사에 관한 연구", 사법행정, 50(4) (2009), 한국사법행정학회
- 김혁돈, "존엄사 입법화에 대한 비교법적 제안", 법학논총, 33(2), pp.581~608 (2009), 법학연구소
- 노동일, "치료거부권, 죽을 권리 및 존엄사에 대한 재검토 : 헌법적 관점에서", 공법학연구, 10(2), pp.3~29 (2009), 한국비교공법학회
- 문성제, "무의미한 연명치료 중단을 위한 제 요건 - 서울고등법원 2009. 2. 10, 2008나116869판결을 중심으로 -", 한국의료법학회지, 17(1), pp.67~94 (2009), 한국의료법학회
- 朴永浩, "消極的 安樂死의 許容與否에 대한 小考", 저스티스, 65, pp.205~235 (2002), 한국법학원
- 유선경, "형법상 안락사․존엄사에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 이상원, "존엄사를 어떻게 볼 것인가?", 신학지남, 76(2) (2009)
- 이인영, "말기환자의 자기결정권 존중을 위한 입법제안", 한국의료법학회지, 16(2) (2008), 한국의료법학회
- 이인영, "존엄사에 관한 고찰", 한림법학, 14 (2004)
- 이준일, "대법원의 존엄사 인정과 인간의 존엄 및 생명권", 고시계, (629) (2009)
- 村上喜良, "基礎から学ぶ生命倫理学" (2008), keisoshobo
- 樋口範雄, ". in: 生命倫理と法," (2005), 弘文堂
