고등학교 수학 교과서에서의 반례에 대한 학습가능성 탐색
An investigation in learnability of counter-examples in secondary school mathematics textbooks
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the pedagogical importance of counter-examples thatcontradict statements about mathematics education research and the curriculum revision process for high schoolmathematics courses. Using a literature research method, this study analyzed views about counter-examplesaccording to a method of approach to statements and the classification of counter-examples and their criteria. The study also described the learnability of the content of counter-examples presented in Korean secondaryschool mathematics textbooks. The results showed that generating many counter-examples enables learners tounderstand mathematical concepts exactly, construct links between mathematical contents, and have flexiblethoughts about mathematical objects. Considering the learnability of counter-examples, the contents ofcounter-examples in school mathematics textbooks are needed for mathematics teachers and students togenerate numerous counter-examples and verify the justification of generating counter-examples in variousmanners.
Abstract
In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the pedagogical importance of counter-examples thatcontradict statements about mathematics education research and the curriculum revision process for high schoolmathematics courses. Using a literature research method, this study analyzed views about counter-examplesaccording to a method of approach to statements and the classification of counter-examples and their criteria. The study also described the learnability of the content of counter-examples presented in Korean secondaryschool mathematics textbooks. The results showed that generating many counter-examples enables learners tounderstand mathematical concepts exactly, construct links between mathematical contents, and have flexiblethoughts about mathematical objects. Considering the learnability of counter-examples, the contents ofcounter-examples in school mathematics textbooks are needed for mathematics teachers and students togenerate numerous counter-examples and verify the justification of generating counter-examples in variousmanners.
참고문헌 (68)
- 교육과학기술부, (2011), 교육과학기술부
- 김수미, "범례 제시를 통한 도형 개념 지도 방안", 수학교육학연구, 15(4), pp.401~417 (2005), 대한수학교육학회
- 김수환, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 교학사
- 김수환, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 교학사
- 김해경, "고등학교 수학 Ⅰ" (2009), 더 텍스트
- 김해경, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 더 텍스트
- 양승갑, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 금성출판사
- 양승갑, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 금성출판사
- 우무하, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 박영사
- 우무하, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 박영사
- 우정호, "고등학교 수학 Ⅰ" (2009), 두산동아
- 우정호, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 두산동아
- 류희찬, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 미래엔컬처그룹
- 류희찬, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 미래엔컬처그룹
- 윤재한, "고등학교 수학 Ⅰ" (2009), 더 텍스트
- 윤재한, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 더 텍스트
- 이강섭, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 지학사
- 이강섭, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 지학사
- 이동원, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 법문사
- 이동원, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 법문사
- 이만근, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 고려출판
- 이만근, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 고려출판
- 이정곤, "예비교사들을 대상으로 한 증명활동과 반례생성 수행결과 분석 : 수열의 극한을 중심으로", 수학교육학연구, 21(4), pp.379~398 (2011), 대한수학교육학회
- 이종희, "상위권 고등학생들의 수학적 정당화와 반증의 유형에 대한 사례연구", 교과교육학연구, 13(3), pp.633~652 (2009), 교과교육연구소
- 이준열, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 천재교육
- 이준열, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 천재교육
- 정상권, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 금성출판사
- 정상권, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 금성출판사
- 최용준, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 천재교육
- 최용준, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 천재교육
- 황석근, "고등학교 수학 I" (2009), 교학사
- 황석근, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 교학사
- 황선욱, "고등학교 수학 Ⅰ" (2009), 좋은책신사고
- 황선욱, "고등학교 수학 Ⅱ" (2009), 좋은책신사고
- Alcock, L., "Using warranted implications to read and understand proofs", For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(1), pp.34~38 (2005)
- Balacheff, N., "Radical constructivism in mathematics education", pp.89~110 (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Ball, D. L., "The Teaching of Proof", Paper presented at the International Congress of Mathematicians, pp.907~920 (2002)
- Carpenter, T., "Proceedings of the Twelfth International Commission on Mathematical Instruction", pp.155~162 (2001), University of Melbourne
- ": Preparing America’s students for college and career" (2011)[URL]
- Epp, S., "A unified framework for proof and disproof", Mathematics Teacher, 91(8), pp.708~713 (1998)
- Hanna, G., "Advanced mathematical thinking", pp.54~61 (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Hanna, G., "Challenges to the importance of proof", For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), pp.42~49 (1995)
- Hersh, R., "Proving is convincing and explaining", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, pp.389~399 (1993)
- Knuth, E., "Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(1), pp.61~88 (2002)
- Ko, Y., "Proofs and Counterexamples: undergraduate students' strategies for validating arguments, evaluating statements, and constructing productions", 박사, pp.2010
- Ko, Y., "Validating proofs and counterexamples across content domains: Practices of importance for mathematic majors", Journal for Mathematical Behavior, 32, pp.20~35 (2013)
- Komatsu, K., "Counter-examples for refinement of conjectures and proofs in primary school mathematics", Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29, pp.1~10 (2010)
- Lakatos, I., "Proofs and refutations : The logic of mathematical discovery" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Lampert, M., "When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer : Mathematical knowing and teaching", American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), pp.29~63 (1990)
- Lin, F. L., "Modeling students' learning on mathematical proof and refutation", Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, pp.3~18 (2005), University of Melbourne
- Lithner, J., "Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbooks exercises", The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, pp.405~427 (2004)
- Mason, J., "Using counter-examples in calculus" (2009), Imperial College Press
- Mesa, V., "Strategies for controlling the work in mathematics textbooks for introductory calculus", Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 16, pp.235~265 (2010)
- Mesa, V., "Textbook mediation of teaching : an example from tertiary mathematics instructors", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), pp.85~107 (2012)
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics., "Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics" (1989), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics., "Principles and standards for school mathematics" (2000), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
- Peled, I., "Counter-examples that(only)prove and counter-examples that(also)explain", FOCUS on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19(3), pp.49~61 (1997)
- Polya, G., "How to solve it" (1973), Princeton University Press
- Schmidt, W. H., "Many visions, many aims, 1 : A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics" (1996), Kluwer
- Schoenfeld, A. H., "Teaching and Learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective", pp.12~16 (2009), Routledge
- Selden, A., "Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem?", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), pp.4~36 (2003)
- Thurston, W. P., "On proof and progress in mathematics", For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(1), pp.29~37 (1995)
- Travers, K. J., "The IEA Study of mathematics I : Analusis of mathematics curricula" (1989), Pergamon Press
- Watson, A., "Mathematics as a constructive activity: learners generating examples" (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Weber, K., "Mathematics majors’ perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof", Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, pp.306~336 (2010)
- Yackel, E., "A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics", pp.227~236 (2003), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
- Zaslavsky, O., "Students’ understanding of the role of counter-examples", Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, 4, pp.225~232 (1998), University of Stellenbosch
- Zazkis, R., "What makes a counterexample exemplary?", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), pp.195~208 (2008)
