사후적 경합범과 법원의 양형재량권
The Concurrent Offences of the latter part of the Criminal Law § 37 and the Court's Discretionary Power in the Examination of an Offence
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Regarding the punishment of the Concurrent Offences of the latter part of the Criminal Law § 37, the Criminal Law § 39 ① which was amended in 2005 rules "the sentence … can be decreased or exempted." On this article, the Supreme Court decided that the court could decrease or exempt. However, the Supreme court's decision seems to be inappropriate, considering both the purpose of the amendment of the Criminal Law § 39 and the equity of the Concurrent Offences of the former part of the Criminal Law § 37. In other words, what the court decides with "considering equity" means that the court should examine the view of equity in making sentence and decrease or exempt the sentence if the court finds that the sentence should be decreased or exempted. Therefore, it should be interpreted that the court should decrease or exempt the sentence, except that the sentence should be increased after deciding the sentence with "considering equity".
Abstract
Regarding the punishment of the Concurrent Offences of the latter part of the Criminal Law § 37, the Criminal Law § 39 ① which was amended in 2005 rules "the sentence … can be decreased or exempted." On this article, the Supreme Court decided that the court could decrease or exempt. However, the Supreme court's decision seems to be inappropriate, considering both the purpose of the amendment of the Criminal Law § 39 and the equity of the Concurrent Offences of the former part of the Criminal Law § 37. In other words, what the court decides with "considering equity" means that the court should examine the view of equity in making sentence and decrease or exempt the sentence if the court finds that the sentence should be decreased or exempted. Therefore, it should be interpreted that the court should decrease or exempt the sentence, except that the sentence should be increased after deciding the sentence with "considering equity".
참고문헌 (22)
- 김성돈, "형법총론" (2009), SKKUP
- 김일수, "한국형법Ⅱ" (1992), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법총론" (2009), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법총론" (2008), 홍문사
- 성낙현, "형법총론" (2010), 동방문화사
- 손동권, "형법총론" (2005), 율곡출판사
- 오영근, "형법총론" (2009), 박영사
- 유기천, (1984), 일조각
- 이영란, (2008), 형설출판사
- 이재상, "형법총론" (2003), 박영사
- 정성근, "형법총론" (2009), 삼지원
- 정영일, "형법총론" (2010), 박영사
- 김태명, "개정형법상 사후적 경합범의 요건과 처벌", 비교형사법연구, 7(2(2)), pp.1~28 (2005), 한국비교형사법학회
- 박종연, "형법상 경합범 규정의 문제점, 2000. 10. 25. 인터넷 법률신문, 제2925호", ~ (2000)
- 오영근, "형법 제39조 제1항의 의미, 한국고시", ~ (2008)
- 윤동호, "형벌가중체계의 개선방안 : 누범·상습범·경합범" (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이경렬, "경합범의 여죄에 대한 정당한 처벌과일사부재리 원칙에 관한 연구", 형사법연구, 19(1) (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 이경렬, "사후적 경합범에 대한 형의 집행과 남은 문제점", 비교형사법연구, 8(2), pp.319~340 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 이천현, "형법 제39조 제1항의 의미", 형사판례연구, 17, pp.94~117 (2009), 한국형사판례연구회
- 정진경, "형법 제37조 후단 경합범과 약식명령(하), 인터넷 법률신문, 2000. 12. 14. 2938호", ~ (2000)
- 조자룡, "개정형법 제39조 해석에 관한 소고, 인터넷 법률신문, 2005. 7. 14", ~ (2005)
- 최병각, "경합범의 성립과 처벌", 비교형사법연구, 6(1), pp.73~90 (2004), 한국비교형사법학회