수학 문제 만들기 유형에 따른 가추 유형과 가추에 동원된 사고 전략 분석
Analysis of abduction and thinking strategies by type of mathematical problem posing
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 학생이 만든 수학 문제에 따른 가추 유형과 가추에 동원된 사고 전략에 대해 알아보았다. 중학교 2학년 4명의 학생이 네 개의 과제에 대해 문제 만들기 활동을 하여, 동치문제, 동형문제, 유사문제를 만들었다. 동치문제의 경우 조작적 가추가 주로 발현되었다. 동형문제와 유사문제는 조작적 가추, 이론적 가추, 창의적 가추가 모두 발현되다. 가추에 동원된 사고 전략으로, 조작적 가추는 대상으로 인식하기, 패턴 찾기, 숫자나 그림으로 변환하기, 유추하기, 반대로 생각하기, 결합하기, 제거하기의 사고전략이 나타났다. 이론적 가추에서는 수학적, 경험적, 확산적 지식을 활용하는 사고전략이 나타났다. 창의적 가추에서는 상승화 전략, 형식화 전략, 창조적 전략이 나타났다. 결합하기, 제거하기, 수학적, 경험적, 타교과 지식의 활용, 문제와 직접적 관련이 없는 규칙을 접목시켜 만드는 창조적 전략은 본 연구에서 새롭게 도출된 사고 전략이다.
Abstract
This study examined the types of abduction and the thinking strategies by the mathematics problems posed by students. Four students who were 2nd graders in middle school participated in problem posing on four tasks that were given, and the problems that they posed were classified into equivalence problem, isomorphic problem, and similar problem. The type of abduction appeared were different depending on the type of problems that students posed. In case of equivalence problem, the given condition of the problems was recognized as object for posing problems and it was the manipulative abduction. In isomorphic problem and similar problem, manipulative abduction, theoretical abduction, and creative abduction were all manifested, and creative abduction was manifested more in similar problem than in isomorphic problem. Thinking strategies employed at abduction were examined in order to find out what rules were presumed by students across problem posing activity. Seven types of thinking strategies were identified as having been used on rule inference by manipulative selective abduction. Three types of knowledge were used on rule inference by theoretical selective abduction. Three types of thinking strategies were used on rule inference by creative abduction.
참고문헌 (37)
- Brown, S. I., "The art of problem posing" (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher
- Conner, A., "Identifying kinds of reasoning in collective argumentation", Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(3), pp.181~200 (2014)
- Creswell, J. W., "Research design : Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches" (2009), Sage Publications
- Eco, U., "The sign of three : Dupin, Holmes and Peirce", pp.198~220 (1983), Indiana University Press
- Inglis, M., "Modelling mathematical argumentation : the importance of qualification", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), pp.3~21 (2007)
- Jung, S. M., "Three concepts of discovery", The Korean Society for Cognitive Science, 4(1), pp.25~49 (1993)
- 김판수, "초등수학 영재의 문제설정 단계와 사고과정 분석 : 성냥개비 과제에 대한 사례분석을 중심으로", 초등교육연구, 18(2), pp.303~334 (2005), 한국초등교육학회
- 김선희, "수학적 추론으로서의 가추법", 수학교육학연구, 12(2), pp.8~290 (2002), 대한수학교육학회
- Kim, S. H., "Semiotic consideration on the appropriation of the mathematical knowledge", Doctor, pp.2004
- Kim, W. K., "Mathematic 1" (2015), visang
- Krulik, S., "Reasoning and problem solving : A handbook for elementary school teachers. the United" (1992), NCTM
- 권용주, "과학적 가설 지식의 생성 과정에 대한 바탕이론", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), pp.458~469 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- Lee, H., "Syllogism and dialectic", Kyungnam Journal of Philosophy, 5, pp.3~30 (1989)
- Lee, M. H., "Analysis of Abduction Types and Thinking Strategies on Mathematics Problem Posing", Doctor, pp.2020
- 이영하, "교과서 문제해결에 포함된 가추의 유형 - 중학교 2학년과 3학년 수학 교과서를 중심으로-", 수학교육학연구, 23(3), pp.335~351 (2013), 대한수학교육학회
- Magnani, L., "Abduction, reason, and science : Process of discovery and explanation", pp.2001, Kluwer Academic
- Ministry of Education, "Mathematical curriculum", Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
- Merriam, S. B., "Qualitative research and case study applications in education" (1988), Jossy-Bass
- 나귀수, "수학 영재 학생들의 문제 만들기에 대한 연구", 학교수학, 19(1), pp.77~93 (2017), 대한수학교육학회
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(NCTM, "Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics", ~ (1989)
- 오필석, "지구과학의 한 탐구 방법으로서 귀추법에 대한 이론적 고찰", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(5), pp.610~623 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
- 오필석, "지구환경적 문제 해결 과정에서 귀추적 추론을 위한 규칙 추리 전략들", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(4), pp.546~558 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- Paik, S. Y., "Teaching & learning of mathematical problem-solving" (2016), Kyungmoon
- Pease, A., "Five theories of reasoning: Interconnections and applications to mathematics", Logic and Logical Philosophy, 20(1-2), pp.7~57 (2011)
- Pedemonte, B., "How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed?", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), pp.23~41 (2007)
- Pedemonte, B., "The role of abduction in proving processes", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), pp.281~303 (2011)
- Peirce, C. S., "Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce Vols Ⅰ-Ⅵ" (1958), Harvard University Press
- Peirce, C. S., "Collect papers of Charles Sanders Peirce Vols Ⅶ-Ⅷ" (1980), Harvard University Press
- Pólya, G., "How to solve it" (1957), Doubleday & Company, Inc
- "Abduction: Between conceptual richness and computational complexity" (2000)[URL]
- Reed, S. K., "Constraints on the abstraction of solutions", Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, pp.532~540 (1989)
- Reys, R. E., "Helping children learn mathematics" (2012), John Wiley & Sons
- Rivera, F. D., "Abduction in pattern generalization", Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, pp.97~104 (2007)
- Silver, E. A., "Posing mathematical problems", Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 27(3), pp.293~309 (1996)
- Stickles, P. R., "An analysis of secondary and middle school teacher’s mathematical problem posing", Doctor, pp.2006
- Toulmin, S. E., "The uses of argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- Weber, K., "Proof validation in real analysis : Inferring and checking warrants", The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(2), pp.125~134 (2005)