형사절차상 진실·사실·실체적 진실의 관계와 그 발견
Relation and finding of the Truth, Fact and substantial Truth in the Criminal Process.
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We sometimes mix up Truth and Fact in the everyday life as well criminal Procedure. and in the criminal Procedure we can find a term of substantial Truth. This paper has a goal to define concept of the Truth , Fact and substantial Truth, and how to find the substantial Truth, and whether these term have any relationship each other. Principal of finding substantial Truth, speedy trial, due process of law are the aim of the Criminal procedure, discussion about the concept of the truth has to do with concrete style of the criminal process. Generally Truth means veritableness without lie, Fact means what really happened. And substantial Truth is a kind of truth in the criminal Procedure, and which Judge in the criminal Procedure had found, which were made from opinion, decision and inference by the participants to the lawsuit. And it is impossible to find the truth itself. Judge can not help approach to the truth based on the a verifiable fact. The finding of the substantial Truth has meaning only if the substantial Truth share with substantive justification as well procedural justification. For the finding of the substantial Truth it is important to keep communication between the parties to a suit .
Abstract
We sometimes mix up Truth and Fact in the everyday life as well criminal Procedure. and in the criminal Procedure we can find a term of substantial Truth. This paper has a goal to define concept of the Truth , Fact and substantial Truth, and how to find the substantial Truth, and whether these term have any relationship each other. Principal of finding substantial Truth, speedy trial, due process of law are the aim of the Criminal procedure, discussion about the concept of the truth has to do with concrete style of the criminal process. Generally Truth means veritableness without lie, Fact means what really happened. And substantial Truth is a kind of truth in the criminal Procedure, and which Judge in the criminal Procedure had found, which were made from opinion, decision and inference by the participants to the lawsuit. And it is impossible to find the truth itself. Judge can not help approach to the truth based on the a verifiable fact. The finding of the substantial Truth has meaning only if the substantial Truth share with substantive justification as well procedural justification. For the finding of the substantial Truth it is important to keep communication between the parties to a suit .
참고문헌 (23)
- 오기두, "배심원의 판단능력", 저스티스, (96), pp.124~138 (2007), 한국법학원
- 권재술, "우리가 보는 세상은 진실한가" (2000), 교육과학사
- 김성돈, "독일형사소송법" (2012), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 김종구, "형법이론과 대법원 판례에서 본 규범주의에 대한 고찰", 법학연구, (41), pp.225~245 (2011), 한국법학회
- 김종률, "합리적 심증과 과학적 사실인정", 형사법의 신동향, (26), pp.1~96 (2010), 대검찰청
- 증거의 신빙성 제고를 위한 효과적인 증거수집 및 현출방안 연구, "류혁상", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2005)
- 변종필, "형사소송에서의 진실개념과 형사소송법", 형사정책연구, 7(3) (1996)
- 박노섭, "독일 사실인정론에 관한 연구와 그 시사점", 형사정책, 18(1), pp.255~287 (2006), 한국형사정책학회
- 김진성, "아리스토텔레스: 형이상학" (2007), 이제이북스
- "재판자료", 2006, ~
- 이상돈, "법인식론의 실천적 과제와 대화이론 -법인식론의 하버바스적 이해-, In 현대법철학의 흐름" (1996), 법문사
- 이상돈, "법이론" (2005), 세창출판사
- 이용구, "사실인정 과정의 논증, In 재판실무연구" (2009), 광주지방법원
- 이용우, "판례를 통해서본 경험칙", 재판자료, 25 (1985)
- G.W.F.헤겔, "법철학" (2008), 한길사
- 임마누엘 칸트, "순수이성비판 1" (2012), 아카넷
- 유승룡, "법적 논증과 논리칙 경험칙, 법관의 의사결정-이론과 실무-" (2010), 사법발전재단 (법원행정처)
- 조원철, "간접증거에 의한 사실의 인정, 사실인정방법론의 정립(형사재판편)", 재판자료, 110 (2006), 법원행정처
- 鄭鏞仁, "사실오인과 경험칙", 재판자료, 22 (1984)
- Alfred J. Ayer, "Language, Truth and Logic" (1936), Victor Gollancz
- Glanville Williams, "Law and Fact" (1976)
- Jack M. Balkin, "The Proliferation of Legal Truth", Harvard Jounal of Law and Public Policy (2003)
- Harold J. Berman, "The Transformation of English Legal Science: From Hale to Blackstone", Emory L.J, 45, pp.437~ (1996)