본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

학업성취도 예측 요인 분석 및 인공지능 예측 모델 개발 - 블렌디드 수학 수업을 중심으로

Analysis of achievement predictive factors and predictive AI model development – Focused on blended math classes

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구는 학습분석학을 기반으로 블렌디드 수학 수업에서 발생하는 학습 데이터를 활용하여 수학 학업성취도를 예측하는 요인이 무엇인지 탐색하고, 그 결과를 활용하여 수학 학업성취도를 예측하는 인공지능 모델을 개발하고자 하였다. 초등학교 5~6학년 학생 205명의 수학 학습 성향, LMS 데이터, 평가 결과를 수집하여 랜덤포레스트 모델을 분석하였다. 수학 학습성향에는 수학학습 자신감, 수학불안, 수학교과 흥미, 수학학습 자기관리, 수학학습전략이 포함되었다. LMS 데이터로 e학습터의 진도율, 학습 횟수, 학습 시간을 수집하였다. 평가는 진단평가와 각 단원의 단원평가 결과를 사용하였다. 분석 결과 수학 학습성향 중 수학 학습 전략이 저성취 학생을 예측에 가장 중요한 요인으로 나타났다. LMS 학습 데이터는 예측에 미미한 영향을 주었다. 본 연구는 인공지능 모델이 블렌디드 수학 수업에서 발생하는 학습 데이터로 저성취 학생을 예측할 수 있음을 시사한다. 또한 분석 결과를 통해 교사가학생을 평가하고 피드백하는 데 구체적인 정보를 제공하여 교사의 평가 활동에 보조적인 역할을 할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Abstract

As information and communication technologies are being developed so rapidly, education research is actively conducted to provide optimal learning for each student using big data and artificial intelligence technology. In this study, using the mathematics learning data of elementary school 5th to 6th graders conducting blended mathematics classes, we tried to find out what factors predict mathematics academic achievement and developed an artificial intelligence model that predicts mathematics academic performance using the results. Math learning propensity, LMS data, and evaluation results of 205 elementary school students had analyzed with a random forest model. Confidence, anxiety, interest, self-management, and confidence in math learning strategy were included as mathematics learning disposition. The progress rate, number of learning times, and learning time of the e-learning site were collected as LMS data. For evaluation data, results of diagnostic test and unit test were used. As a result of the analysis it was found that the mathematics learning strategy was the most important factor in predicting low-achieving students among mathematics learning propensities. The LMS training data had a negligible effect on the prediction. This study suggests that an AI model can predict low-achieving students with learning data generated in a blended math class. In addition, it is expected that the results of the analysis will provide specific information for teachers to evaluate and give feedback to students.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 안미리, "학습분석학 국내 문헌 고찰: 로그 데이터를 이용한 실증연구를 중심으로", 교육공학연구, 32(2), pp.253~291 (2016), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
  2. Alharbi, S., "Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems", International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), pp.143~155 (2014)[DOI]
  3. Biau, G., "A random forest guided tour", Test, 25(2), pp.197~227 (2016)[DOI]
  4. Breiman, L., "Classification and regression trees" (1984), CRC press
  5. Breiman, L, "Bagging predictors", Machine Learning, 24(2), pp.123~140 (1996)[DOI]
  6. Breiman, L, "Random Forests", Machine Learning, 45(1), pp.5~32 (2001)[DOI]
  7. Bureau, A., "Identifying SNPs predictive of phenotype using random forests", Genetic Epidemiology : The Official Publication of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society, 28(2), pp.171~182 (2005)[DOI]
  8. Charles, R. I., "An evaluation of a process-oriented instructional program in mathematical problem solving in grades 5 and 7", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), pp.15~34 (1984)[DOI]
  9. Anita Dani, "Student's Patterns of Interaction with a Mathematics Intelligent Tutor: Learning Analytics Application", International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 5(2), pp.01~18 (2016), Academy and Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC)[DOI]
  10. Elias, T., "Learning analytics : Definitions, process and potential", Learning, 23 (2011)
  11. Jerome H. Friedman, "Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.", The Annals of Statistics, 29(5) (2001), Institute of Mathematical Statistics[DOI]
  12. 홍효정, "블렌디드 러닝기반 기초수학 수업에서 자기효능감, 자기조절학습이 학습지속의향에 미치는 영향", 공학교육연구, 20(6), pp.3~11 (2017), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  13. Jo, I. H., "Proposal of LAPA (Learning Analytics for Prediction & Action) model", Review of Korean Society of Management Information System Research Seminar 2012 (2012)
  14. Jo, I. H., "Learning analysis department, learning design, and development of its convergence topography", Review of Conference of Korean Society of Educational Technology, 2015(2), pp.422~434 (2015)
  15. Jo, I. H., "Understanding Learning Analytics" (2019), Park Young Story
  16. Jo, I., "Evaluation of Online log variables that estimate learner’s time management in a Korean online learning context", The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1), pp.195~213 (2016)[DOI]
  17. Jo, Y. S., "Potential and Prospects of Learning Analytics Technology Utilization", Information and Communications Magazine, 31(12), pp.73~80 (2014)
  18. Jordan, M. M., "Universities Confront ‘Tech Disruption’ : Perceptions of Student Engagement Online Using Two Learning Management Systems", The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 10(1), pp.4~ (2018)
  19. Kakasevski, G, "Evaluating usability in learning management system Moodle", Iti 2008-30th international conference on information technology interfaces, pp.613~618 (2008), IEEE
  20. 고호경, "수학학습 상담을 위한 진단 검사지 개발 연구", 수학교육 논문집, 29(4), pp.723~743 (2015), 한국수학교육학회
  21. 김안나, "코로나19시대 LMS 빅데이터를 이용한 학습자 행태와 학습성과에 대한 영향분석: J대학 중심으로", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 21(6), pp.565~579 (2021), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  22. 김홍겸, "수학학습부진아 지도방법에 따른 학업성취도 향상에 대한 메타연구", 수학교육, 59(1), pp.31~45 (2020), 한국수학교육학회[DOI]
  23. The Learning Management System Evolution. Research bulletin, "Lang, L.", ECAR, ~ (2014)
  24. 임정훈, "모바일 학습(Mobile Learning)을 위한 교수학습 모형의 설계 방향 탐색", 한국교육논단, 8(1), pp.101~124 (2009), 한국교육포럼(아시아태평양교육학회)
  25. McMillan, J. H., "Classroom Assessment : Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction" (2014), Pearson
  26. "Science, Mathematics, Information, Convergence Education Comprehensive Plan (’20~’24). Ministry of Education" (2020)[URL]
  27. Montebello, M., "Personalized Learning Environments", 2021 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), pp.134~138 (2021), IEEE
  28. TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics, "Mullis, I. V.", International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, ~ (2011)
  29. Murshitha, S. M., "The effect of lecturers’ performance on students’ LMS adoption", Proceedings of the Third International Symposium 2013, pp.19~24 (2013)
  30. Nagy, J., "Using learning management systems in business and economics studies in Hungarian higher education", Education and Information Technologies, 21(4), pp.897~917 (2016)
  31. Nichols, M., "A theory for eLearning", Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), pp.1~10 (2003)
  32. Oviatt, S., "Problem solving, domain expertise and learning: Ground-truth performance results for math data corpus", Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International conference on multimodal interaction, pp.569~574 (2013)
  33. Park, H. S., "Do it! Introduction to deep learning that you can learn coding honestly" (2019), Easyspublishing
  34. 박만구, "머신러닝 추천모듈이 적용된 맞춤형 학습 플랫폼 효과성 탐색: 학습시간, 자기주도적 학습능력, 수학에 대한 태도, 수학학업성취도를 중심으로", 수학교육, 59(4), pp.373~387 (2020), 한국수학교육학회[DOI]
  35. Romero, C., "Data mining in e-learning(Vol. 4 )" (2006), Wit Press
  36. Schoenfeld, A. H., "Making sense of"out loud"problem-solving protocols", The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 4(2), pp.171~191 (1985)
  37. 신승범, "랜덤포레스트를 위한 상관예측변수 중요도", 응용통계연구, 34(2), pp.177~190 (2021), 한국통계학회
  38. Siemens, G., "Penetrating the fog : Analytics in learning and education", EDUCAUSE review, 46(5), pp.30~ (2011)
  39. Tempelaar, D. T., "Formative assessment and learning analytics", Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp.205~209 (2013), Association for Computing Machinery
  40. Tempelaar, D. T., "Computer assisted, formative assessment and dispositional Learning Analytics in learning mathematics and statistics", Communications in Computer and Information Science, 439, pp.67~78 (2014)[DOI]
  41. Wolff, A., "Improving retention: predicting at-risk students by analysing clicking behaviour in a virtual learning environment", Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, pp.145~149 (2013), Association for Computing Machinery
  42. Qi, Y., "Ensemble Machine Learning", pp.307~323 (2012), Springer

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)