본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

개인정보 침해의 형법적 대응

Study on the Protection of Personal Information in Criminal Perspectives

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This paper examines “integrated” protection measures against the infringement of personal information in criminal perspectives. It differentiates from the existing legislative measures, that is, special law institution. Informationalization produces one of serious side effects; the infringement risk of personal information. To handle this, we have devised and legislated various special laws separatively and individually along with the development of information technology(IT) in various fields. This type of laws, however, has some weaknesses. Some of special laws sporadically regulate their subjects or occasionally overlap with others in certain legal areas. They have also caused the imbalance of punishment system. As lawmaking often lags behind the development of IT, there exists a gap between infringing personal information and protecting it. One of suggestions can be, such as it was, legislation of a new, “comprehensive” special law to response to all types of cyber crimes or protection of electric personal information. It, however, can be more reasonable to supplement or amend criminal codes than to propose another new special law. From this point of view, first up, this paper analyzes criminal laws and regulations dealing with the protection of personal information, then, discovers weakness of the related legal system. Secondly, It examines the meaning of personal information and its change in legal view. Finally, it observes the possibility of criminal codes as a legal protection of electric personal information as well as its limits. In conclusion, personal information should be understood as an inherent right of individuals. Accordingly, it involves the criminal protection against the infringement of self-determination. In order to respond the ever-changing information society, lawmaking policies should rather focus on a general and principle legal basis than a case-by-case basis influenced by technological changes. As technological environment changes or even though it does, the existing “criminal code” as a general criminal standard and its application should be middle of consideration. The fairness of criminal punishment matters. Accordingly, it is important to take criminal measures which focuses not on the protection of personal information itself but on types and similarities of its infringement. In addition, it is necessary to develop IT technology to protect individual's privacy in ever-changing information society.

Abstract

This paper examines “integrated” protection measures against the infringement of personal information in criminal perspectives. It differentiates from the existing legislative measures, that is, special law institution. Informationalization produces one of serious side effects; the infringement risk of personal information. To handle this, we have devised and legislated various special laws separatively and individually along with the development of information technology(IT) in various fields. This type of laws, however, has some weaknesses. Some of special laws sporadically regulate their subjects or occasionally overlap with others in certain legal areas. They have also caused the imbalance of punishment system. As lawmaking often lags behind the development of IT, there exists a gap between infringing personal information and protecting it. One of suggestions can be, such as it was, legislation of a new, “comprehensive” special law to response to all types of cyber crimes or protection of electric personal information. It, however, can be more reasonable to supplement or amend criminal codes than to propose another new special law. From this point of view, first up, this paper analyzes criminal laws and regulations dealing with the protection of personal information, then, discovers weakness of the related legal system. Secondly, It examines the meaning of personal information and its change in legal view. Finally, it observes the possibility of criminal codes as a legal protection of electric personal information as well as its limits. In conclusion, personal information should be understood as an inherent right of individuals. Accordingly, it involves the criminal protection against the infringement of self-determination. In order to respond the ever-changing information society, lawmaking policies should rather focus on a general and principle legal basis than a case-by-case basis influenced by technological changes. As technological environment changes or even though it does, the existing “criminal code” as a general criminal standard and its application should be middle of consideration. The fairness of criminal punishment matters. Accordingly, it is important to take criminal measures which focuses not on the protection of personal information itself but on types and similarities of its infringement. In addition, it is necessary to develop IT technology to protect individual's privacy in ever-changing information society.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. "한국 2000년 (2), 정보사회와 콤퓨터 (동아일보 1970년 1월 10일 토요일)", 4~ (1970)
  2. 이홍섭, "정보화의 역기능과 정보보호대책", pp.20~ (2005), 한국정보통신산업협회
  3. 한상훈, "개인정보의 법적 보호", 경찰법연구, 2(1), pp.203~210 (2004)
  4. Samuel Warren, "The Right to Privacy", Harvard Law Review, 4, pp.199~220 (1890)
  5. 김성규, "형법에 의한 정보프라이버시보호의 범위와 과제", 형사정책, 18(2), pp.127~148 (2006), 한국형사정책학회
  6. "헌법재판소 2005.5.26. 선고 99헌마513", ~
  7. 백윤철, "정보화사회에 따른 법적 과제", 인터넷법률, (15), pp.33~ (2003), 법무부
  8. 주요 국가의 개인정보보호 동향 조사, "임종인", 한국정보보호진흥원, 7~ (2009)
  9. 이관기, "알권리와 프라이버시권의 관계에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1993
  10. 장영민, "정보통신망발전에 따른 개인정보보호", 정보사회와 범죄(제18회 형사정책세미나자료집), pp.71~ (1996), 한국형사정책연구원
  11. 정보화역기능 실태조사보고서, "박종우", 한국정보보호진흥원, 23~ (2001)
  12. 이덕인, "정보보호정책의 방향과 규범투입정책에 관한 제언", 인터넷법률, (25), pp.123~ (2004), 법무부
  13. 이경렬, "정보사회에서 개인정보의 침해와 형법적 대응방안", 현대적 범죄와 형법적 대응(제8회 한·중 형법 국제 학술심포지움 자료집), pp.296~298 (2010), 한국비교형사법학회
  14. 컴퓨터 범죄에 관한 비교법적·입법론적 연구(’88 전기통신 학술연구 과제), "김종원", 한국형사법학회, ~ (1988)
  15. 이경렬, "산업스파이범죄의 실태와 형사법적 대응", 비교형사법연구, 11(2), pp.53~80 (2009), 한국비교형사법학회
  16. 법무부, "형법개정법률안 제안이유서, 형사법개정자료(XIV)", ~ (1992)
  17. 강동범, "사이버범죄 처벌규정의 문제점과 대책. in: 한국사회의 범죄현상과 대책", pp.43~ (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
  18. 안경옥, "무형적 가치의 형법적 보호와 한계 : 사이버상의 재산과 명예 보호를 중심으로", 경희법학, 42(1), pp.85~106 (2007), 법학연구소
  19. 김성돈, "형법각론, 제2판" (2009), SKKUP
  20. "대법원 2000. 5. 12. 선고 99도5734 판결", ~
  21. 정완, "사이버폭력의 피해실태와 대응방안", 피해자학연구, 13(2), pp.329~359 (2005), 한국피해자학회
  22. 양동철, "사이버폭력에 대한 입법방향 연구", 법조, 55(9), pp.134~173 (2006), 법조협회
  23. "대법원 2004. 6. 25. 선고 2003도4934 판결", ~
  24. 전지연, "개인정보보호 관련법제의 형사정책적 검토", 형사정책연구, 16(3), pp.39~80 (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
  25. 황태정, "정보통신분야 개인정보의 형법적 보호", 원광법학, 25(2), pp.409~440 (2009), 법학연구소
  26. "대법원 1996.5.10. 선고 95도780 판결", ~
  27. "대법원 2006.12.7. 선고 2006도6966 판결", ~
  28. "대법원 1998. 9. 4. 선고 96다11327 판결", ~
  29. 佐久間, "刑法における無形的財産の保護", pp.163~ (1991), 成文堂
  30. "대법원 2002.7.12. 선고 2002도745 판결", ~
  31. 하태영, "한국 형법에 있어서 “재물개념”의 논쟁사-디지털시대의 새로운 법제이론과 형법 제349조 재물간주 규정의 개정-", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.12~322 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
  32. 임웅, "형법각론, 개정판 보정", pp.258~ (2005), 법문사
  33. "대법원 1999.6.22. 선고 99도1095 판결", ~
  34. "대법원 1994.2.22. 선고 93도428 판결", ~
  35. "대법원 2001.10.23. 선고 2001도2991 판결", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (28건)