奇正鎭의 「納凉私議」를 둘러싼 畿湖學界의 論爭

Abstract

Since 18th century, 'Horak debate(湖洛論爭)' had enabled the comprehensive understanding on neo-confucianism and had reflected social and political situations, and had induced productive debates of Kiho school. However, in 19th century, dogmatic inheritance of predecessors scholastic arguments and negation of other scholastic sects became prevailed in conjunction with the socio-political situation. In this circumstances, some scholars tried to reflect on this situation and to find out alternatives. Ki jung jin's 'Napryangsaeui(納凉私議)' was one of the fruit of these efforts. Ki Jung-jin's 'Horak debate', which was tried to establish original nature of Horak dispute and neo-confucianism, became a contested topic of Kiho school by republishing his anthology in the early 20th century. In this article, the author examined the contents and characteristics of the Kiho school's debates on Ki Jung-jin's 'Napryangsaeui' , which was published in the early 20th century, in relation to the transition of Horak debate since 19th century. It was examined that the arguments of Jun-woo's, who firstly criticised 'Napryangsaeui', and Ki Jung-Jin's disciples, who counter-criticised Jun-woo's criticism. And especially the different characteristics of phenomenon world, which was the main debate topic, was investigated in priority. Moreover, by paying attention to the Kiho school's standpoints and attitudes on the debate, this author analysed the changes of the academic views on Horak debate of each schools by way of trial.