신체상 평정척도의 범주 적합도
The appropriate intervals of Contour drawing rating scale categories
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구는 무용전공 대학생들을 대상으로 Thompson & Gray(1995)가 개발한 신체상평정척도(Contour Drawing Rating Scale: CDRS)를 기초로 Shroff(2004)가 확장한 17단계 평정척도의 단계별 반응분포와 척도범주의 동간성을 Rasch평정척도 모형을 적용하여 확인하고 17단계 체형범주가 무용전공 대학생의 신체상 평가에 적합한지의 여부를 검증하는데 목적이 있다. 이 연구의 참여자는 서울, 경기지역에 소재하고 있는 12개 대학에 재학 중인 무용전공 여자대학생 785명이 선정되었다. 평균능력추정치에 의하면 반응범주가 증가할수록 응답자의 능력측정치도 서열적으로 증가함으로써 응답자들은 17단계 체형그림의 크기를 변별하고 있는 것으로 판단된다. 그러나 인접 반응범주의 선택빈도를 비교할 때 응답자들은 짝수단계보다는 홀수단계를 상대적으로 많이 선택하고 있어 17단계 범주는 선택적으로 반응하고 있음이 나타났다. 응답자와 척도 국면별 Logit 점수분포를 고려할 때 이 연구에서 사용된 17단계 신체상평정척도는 응답자의 신체상을 평정하는 척도로서 비교적 타당하다고 판단할 수 있으나 체형범주별 Logit 점수들 간의 동간성 수준은 매우 낮은 것으로 나타났다.
Abstract
Thompson & Gray(1995) developed a rating scale to classify dancers’ bodies into 9 categories, which is called as Contour drawing rating scale (CDRS). Shroff (2004) extended the body rating scale to 17 categories based on Thompson & Gray’s CDRS. In the paper, Shroff's rating scale was used by applying Rasch's statistical model to assess the validity of the scale in terms of the interval of each degree. 785 female students majoring in dancing from 12 Universities in Seoul and Gyeonggi-Do enrolled in the body measurement. As the number of reaction categories increases, the number of categories chosen by the student’s ability measures increases linearly by the result of the average ability measures. Shroff's CDRS seems to be proper in defining body figures’ sizes from the results of the study. However, the students tend to choose the odd numbered categories more than the even numbered categories, when comparing the frequency of the neighbor reaction categories. Shroff’s CDRS seems to be reasonable as a method to define the body images by the result of Logit number distributions of each category, as the intervals of the categories’ Logit numbers were different in widths.
참고문헌 (38)
- 강상조, "평정척도 문하의 편파성", 한국체육측정평가학회지, 1(2), pp.1~15 (1999)
- 김미예, "다국면 Rasch 모형에 의한 운동수행 평가의 평정오차 분석", 한국체육학회지, 42(6), pp.1019~1028 (2003), 한국체육학회
- 김복선, "발레 연기력 평정 척도의 적합도", 대한무용학회 논문집, 38(38호), pp.1~15 (2004), 대한무용학회
- 박진희, "다국면 Rasch모형에 의한 무용연기력 평가", 한국체육측정평가학회지, 2(2), pp.27~37 (2000)
- 박진희, "여자무용수의 전공유형별 형태 특성과 신체상 만족", 한국체육측정평가학회지, 6(2), pp.55~68 (2004)
- 배진경, "창작발레연기력의 평정척도개발과 최적범주", 한국체육학회지, 42(1), pp.499~508 (2003), 한국체육학회
- 조정환, "신체상(Body Image) 척도 개발 연구", 한국체육측정평가학회지, 8(2), pp.147~164 (2006), 한국체육측정평가학회
- 최윤선, "신체표현활동 전공 여자대학생 집단의 체질량지수와 신체상 불만족 간의 관계", 한국체육측정평가학회지, 10(2), pp.1~13 (2008), 한국체육측정평가학회
- 최윤선, "심사자의 엄격성과 전공유형이 무용 연기력 판정에 미치는 효과", 한국체육학회지, 43(1), pp.647~660 (2004), 한국체육학회
- Ambrosi-Randic, N., "Nine, seven, five, or three: how many figures do we need for assessing bodyimage?", Mot Skill, 100(2), pp.488~492 (2005)
- Andrich, D., "Category ordering and their utility", Rasch Measurement Transactio, 9(4), pp.464~465 (1996)
- Bane, S., "Body image and exercise. In: Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement", pp.311~322 (1998), Fitness Information Technology
- Baumgarter, "Measurement for Evaluation" (1995), Brown
- Candy, C., "Underlying dimensions and psychometric properties of the eating behaviors and body image test for preadolescent girls", Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, pp.117~127 (1998)
- Cardinal, T. M., "The Figure Rating Scale as an index of weight status of women on videotape", Obesity, 14, pp.2132~2135 (2006)
- Gardner, R. M., "Development and validation of two new scales for assessment of body image", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, pp.981~993 (1999)
- Klockars, A. J., "The influence of labels and positions in rating scales", Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, pp.85~96 (1988)
- Linacre, "Many-faceted Rasch Measurement" (1989), MESA Press
- Linacre, J. M., "Categorical misfit statistics", Rasch measurement transactions, 9, pp.450~451 (1995)
- Linacre, J. M., (2002), MESA Press
- Marsh, "Cognitive discrepancy models: Actual, ideal, potential, and future self-perspectives of body image", Social Cognition, 17, pp.46~75 (1999)
- Merbitz, C., "Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70, pp.237~255 (1989)
- Michelle Doll, "Rating of figures used for body image assessment varies depending on the method of figure presentation", International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, pp.109~114 (2002)
- Miller, G. A., "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information", Psychological Review, 63, pp.81~97 (1956)
- Parducci, A., "The category effect with rating scales: Number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, pp.496~516 (1986)
- Powers, "Body image in women and its relationship to Self-image and body satisfaction", The Journal of Obesity and Weight Regulation, 5, pp.37~50 (1986)
- Pulvers, K. M., "Development of a culturally relevant body image instrument among urban African Americans", Obesity Research, 12, pp.1641~1651 (2004)
- Shroff, H. M., "An examination of peer-related risk and protective factors for body image disturbance and disordered eating among adolescent girls", 박사, pp.2004
- Stunkard, A. J., "Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. In: The Tenetics of Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders", pp.115~120 (1983), Raven Press
- Thompson, M. A., "Development and validation of a new body-image assessment scale", Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, pp.258~269 (1995)
- Thompson, J. K., "Female and make ratings of upper torso: Actual, ideal, and stereotypical conceptions", Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, pp.345~354 (1992)
- Wildt, A. R., "Determinants of scale response: label versus position", Journal of Marketing Research, 15, pp.261~267 (1978)
- William Safire, "The Way We Live Now :On Language. New york times. August 27", ~ (2000)
- Wood, T. M., "A psychometric analysis of the Simon and Smoll children’s attitude toward physical activity inventory", 석사, pp.1979
- Wright, B. D., "Observations are always ordinal; measurement, however, must be interval", Rehabilitation, 70, pp.857~860 (1989)
- Wright, B. D., "Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement" (1982), MESA Press