본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공공부문에서의 블록체인 활용에 대한 주관적 인식:Q 방법론을 중심으로

Subjective Perception of Blockchain Use in the Public Sector:Focusing on Q-methodology

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구에서는 Q 방법론을 활용하여 공공부문에서의 블록체인 기술 활용에 대한 다양한 이해관계자들의 주관적 인식을 탐구하였다. 본 연구는 블록체인 기술의 공공부문 적용・활용에 관한 기존의 선행연구와 전문가 인터뷰를 바탕으로 Q 진술문들을 작성하였고, 공공부문 내 다양한 전문적 배경을 가진 응답자들의 반응을 순위화하였다. 분석 결과, 네 가지의 유형이 도출되었는데, 이들 유형은 블록체인의 기술적 가능성 및 규제적 제약, 그리고 이에 대한 공공부문 이해관계자들의 인식 사이의 복합적이고 다차원적인 상호작용을 반영한다. 본 연구는 공공부문에서의 블록체인 기술 적용의 동학과 맥락을 제공함으로써 이론적・실천적 함의를 제공한다. 즉, 본 연구는 공공부문 혁신을 위한 블록체인 기술 도입에 관한 자결적 주관성을 이해하는데 기여할 것이다. 또한 공공부문의 목표를 달성하는 데 있어 블록체인 기술 활용에 대한 다양한 인식을 유형화함으로써 향후 공공부문에서의 블록체인 기술 도입의 방향성 제시에 기여할 것이다.

Abstract

This study employs Q-method analysis to explore the diverse perspectives and attitudes surrounding the application of blockchain technology in the public sector. It aims to uncover the tapestry of discourses and operant subjectivities of the various aspects and dimensions of implementing blockchain technology in public services. By using a set of Q-sample statements, participants from different professional backgrounds within the public sector ranked these statements per their viewpoints. The Q analysis revealed four distinctive patterns of opinions and attitudes, reflecting the interplay between technological possibilities, regulatory constraints, and public perceptions. These patterns emphasize the multidimensional nature of stakeholders' perspectives on the integration of blockchain technology into their work. Furthermore, the study offers insights into the dynamic nature of discourse surrounding the adoption of blockchain technology in public services. The study contributes to the understanding of operant subjectivity in the context of technology adoption and public sector innovation, and equips policymakers and practitioners with nuanced viewpoints on blockchain implementation, enabling them to make informed decisions when aligning blockchain technology with public sector objectives and requirements.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 길병옥, "Q방법론의 이해와 적용" (2020), 충남대학교출판문화원
  2. "서울시, 블록체인 전문인력 채용" (2023)[URL]
  3. 김순은, "Q방법론과 사회과학" (2010), 금정
  4. 블록체인을 통한 공공서비스 혁신, "신호원", 딜로이트 컨설팅, ~, pp.인더스트리 포커스, 71호 (2019)
  5. "지폐 찍던 조폐공사의 ICT 전환… 블록체인 넘어 금NFT 거래도" (2023)[URL]
  6. Abelseth, B., "Blockchain tracking and cannabis regulation : Developing a permissioned blockchain network to track Canada's cannabis supply chain", Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management, 14, pp.1~11 (2018)
  7. Abu-Elezz, I., "The benefits and threats of blockchain technology in healthcare : A scoping review", International Journal of Medical Informatics, 142, pp.104246~ (2020)
  8. Alam, S., "Blockchain-based Initiatives: Current state and challenges", Computer Networks, 198, pp.108395~ (2021)
  9. Allessie, D., "The consequences of blockchain architectures for the governance of public services : A case study of the movement of excise goods under duty exemptions", Information Polity, 24(4), pp.487~499 (2019)
  10. Atzori, M., "Blockchain governance and the role of trust service providers : The TrustedChain® network", The JBBA, 1(1), pp.1~17 (2018)
  11. Blockchains unchained (OECD Working Papers on Public Governance), "Berryhill, J.", Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), ~ (2018)
  12. Biswas, S., "A scalable blockchain framework for secure transactions in IoT", IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(3), pp.4650~4659 (2019)
  13. Brown, S. R., "A primer on Q methodology", Operant Subjectivity, 16(3, pp.4) (1993), 91~138
  14. Cagigas, D., "Blockchain for public services : A systematic literature review", IEEE Access, 9, pp.13904~13921 (2021)
  15. Carvalho, R., "Blockchain and public procurement", European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 6(2), pp.187~225 (2019)
  16. Chowdhury, S., "Blockchain technology adoption for managing risks in operations and supply chain management:Evidence from the UK", Annals of Operations Research, pp.1~36 (2022)
  17. Francisco, K., "The supply chain has no clothes : Technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency", Logistics, 2(1), pp.2~ (2018)
  18. Hyvarinen, H., "A blockchain-based approach towards overcoming financial fraud in public sector services", Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, pp.441~456 (2017)
  19. Ishmaev, G., "The ethical limits of blockchain-enabled markets for private IoT data", Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), pp.411~432 (2020)
  20. Jabbar, A., "Investigating the link between transaction and computational costs in a blockchain environment", International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), pp.3423~3436 (2020)
  21. Jafar, U., "Blockchain for electronic voting system—Review and open research challenges", Sensors, 21(17), pp.5874~ (2021)
  22. Jarrahi, M. H., "Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making", Business Horizons, 61(4) (2018)[DOI]
  23. Kouhizadeh, M., "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain : Theoretically exploring adoption barriers", International Journal of Production Economics, 231, pp.107831~ (2021)
  24. Kshetri, N., "Blockchain-enabled e-voting", IEEE Software, 35(4), pp.95~99 (2018)
  25. Ledesma, R. D., "The scree test and the number of factors: A dynamic graphics approach", The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18(E11), pp.1~10 (2015)
  26. Leka, E., "Development and evaluation of blockchain based secure application for verification and validation of academic certificates", Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing, 5(2), pp.22~36 (2021)
  27. Leka, E., "Systematic literature review of blockchain applications: Smart contracts", 2019 International Conference on Information Technologies, pp.1~3 (2019), InfoTech
  28. Liu, Y., "A systematic literature review on blockchain governance", The Journal of Systems and Software, 197, pp.111576~ (2023)
  29. Manski, S., "Building the blockchain world : Technological commonwealth or just more of the same", Strategic Change, 26(5), pp.511~522 (2017)
  30. McKeown, B., "Q methodology (Vol. 66)" (2013), Sage Publications
  31. Meiklejohn, S., "Top ten obstacles along distributed ledgers path to adoption", IEEE Security & Privacy, 16(4), pp.13~19 (2018)
  32. Hossein, K. M., "Bchealth : A novel blockchain-based privacy-preserving architecture for IoT healthcare applications", Computer Communications, 180, pp.31~47 (2021)
  33. Moura, L. M. F., "Blockchain and a technological perspective for public administration : A systematic review", Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 24(3), pp.259~274 (2020)
  34. Mueller-Bloch, C., "Understanding decentralization of decision-making power in proof-of-stake blockchains: An agent-based simulation approach", European Journal of Information Systems, pp.1~20 (2022)
  35. Niemeyer, S., "The ends of deliberation : Meta-consensus and intersubjective rationality as ideal outcomes", Swiss Political Science Review, 13(4), pp.497~526 (2007)
  36. Ølnes, S., "Blockchain in government : Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing", Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), pp.355~364 (2017)
  37. Peters, G. W., "Banking beyond banks and money: A guide to banking services in the twenty-first century", pp.239~278 (2016), Springer International Publishing
  38. Petersen, K., "Systematic mapping studies in software engineering", 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), 12, pp.1~10 (2008)
  39. Ramlo, S. E., "Q methodology and its position in the mixed methods continuum", Operant Subjectivity, 34(3), pp.172~191 (2011)
  40. Saari, A., "Blockchain in real estate : Recent developments and empirical applications", Land Use Policy, 121, pp.106334~ (2022)
  41. Schmidt, C. G., "Blockchain and supply chain relations : A transaction cost theory perspective", Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(4), pp.100552~ (2019)
  42. Shang, Q., "A blockchain-based land titling project in the republic of Georgia: Rebuilding public trust and lessons for future pilot projects", Innovations Technology Governance Globalization, 12(3–4), pp.72~78 (2019)
  43. Sharma, S. K., "Conjoint analysis of blockchain adoption challenges in government", Journal of Computer Information Systems, pp.1~14 (2023)
  44. Stenner, P., "Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method &interpretation" (2012), Sage Publications
  45. Sun, Y., "Technology development and application of blockchain : Current status and challenges", Strategic Study of Chinese Academy of Engineering, 20(2), pp.27~32 (2018)
  46. Sunyaev, A., "Token economy", Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(4), pp.457~478 (2021)
  47. Tian, H., "Design a proof of stake based directed acyclic graph chain", Frontiers in Cyber Security, pp.150~165 (2020)
  48. Toufaily, E., "A framework of blockchain technology adoption : An investigation of challenges and expected value", Information & Management, 58(3), pp.103444~ (2021)
  49. Truby, J., "Blockchain, climate damage, and death : Policy interventions to reduce the carbon emissions, mortality, and net-zero implications of non-fungible tokens and Bitcoin", Energy Research & Social Science, 88, pp.102499~ (2022)
  50. Tseng, J. -H., "Governance on the drug supply chain via gcoin blockchain", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), pp.1055~ (2018)
  51. "GDPR, Blockchain and the right to be forgotten" (2021)[URL]
  52. Wendl, M., "The environmental impact of cryptocurrencies using proof of work and proof of stake consensus algorithms : A systematic review", Journal of Environmental Management, 326(Pt A), pp.116530~ (2023)
  53. Wolfond, G., "A blockchain ecosystem for digital identity : Improving service delivery in Canada’s public and private sectors", Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(10), pp.35~40 (2017)
  54. Zhang, R., "Evaluation of energy consumption in blockchains with proof of work and proof of stake", Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1584(1), pp.012023~ (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)