<연구노트> ‘변곡점’ 위의 ‘3.5세대’, 동남아 교육 환경을말하다
Listening to a Voice: The Korean educational environment for Southeast Asian studies experienced and evaluated by graduate students
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article intends to examine and evaluate Southeast Asian studies in Korea. It is designed to investigate the feasible ways for enhancing the quality of Southeast Asian studies and review all the issues relating to the graduate programs of Southeast Asian studies on the basis of the opinion of graduate students. For the purpose of this article, we examined the necessity and appropriateness of evaluative approaches to academic environment for the improvement of graduate programs and surveyed the opinions of the KISEAS study member. Our research itself cannot be a resolution to the future of the graduate programs of the Southeast Asian studies. Rather, its humble concern is to make a starting point for further discussion with regard to the software and the hardware of the graduate programs of the Southeast Asian studies. The major findings on how to improve the graduate programs are as follows. The programs have to be designed to provide students with broad interdisciplinary training in language and area studies. Also, they should give them a chance to take courses in a variety of disciplines. When it comes to Southeast Asian studies, considerable emphasis must be placed on the field research in Southeast Asia. All graduate students should be encouraged and assisted in their efforts to conduct field researches to learn a lot more than just knowledge. Last but not least, consistent financial, institutional support and eagerness of teachers in education are vital in developing new contents and methods for graduate programs of the Southeast Asian studies.
Abstract
This article intends to examine and evaluate Southeast Asian studies in Korea. It is designed to investigate the feasible ways for enhancing the quality of Southeast Asian studies and review all the issues relating to the graduate programs of Southeast Asian studies on the basis of the opinion of graduate students. For the purpose of this article, we examined the necessity and appropriateness of evaluative approaches to academic environment for the improvement of graduate programs and surveyed the opinions of the KISEAS study member. Our research itself cannot be a resolution to the future of the graduate programs of the Southeast Asian studies. Rather, its humble concern is to make a starting point for further discussion with regard to the software and the hardware of the graduate programs of the Southeast Asian studies. The major findings on how to improve the graduate programs are as follows. The programs have to be designed to provide students with broad interdisciplinary training in language and area studies. Also, they should give them a chance to take courses in a variety of disciplines. When it comes to Southeast Asian studies, considerable emphasis must be placed on the field research in Southeast Asia. All graduate students should be encouraged and assisted in their efforts to conduct field researches to learn a lot more than just knowledge. Last but not least, consistent financial, institutional support and eagerness of teachers in education are vital in developing new contents and methods for graduate programs of the Southeast Asian studies.
참고문헌 (7)
- 김경일, "지역연구의 역사와 이론" (1998), 문화과학사
- 김국진, "동남아세아 지역연구 in: 우리나라 지역연구 현황, 문제점, 활성방안연구" (1991), 서울대 지역종합연구소
- 신윤환, "한국의 지역연구 현황과 과제", 국가전략, 2(1) (1996)
- 이철원 외, "지역학의 현황과 과제" (1995), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 전제성, "한국의 동남아 연구 동향과 과제: '제3세대' 연구자 선언을 기대하며", 동아연구, 50 (2006)
- 조흥국, "제3장 동남아 연구의 현황과 과제 in: 한국의 지역연구 현황과 과제" (1998), 서울대학교 출판부
- 홍두승, "사회조사분석" (2005), 다산출판사
