인도네시아 산림 모라토리엄 분석: 산림 거버넌스를 중심으로
An Analysis of Indonesia Forest Moratorium:With particular reference to Forest Governance
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In May 2010, Indonesia and Norway signed a Letter of Intent on “Cooperation on Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation(REDD).” In the LoI, Norway agreed to offer Indonesia a sum of USD 1 billion with a view to encourage Indonesia to significantly contribute to the successful implementation of REDD+. On 20 May 2011, correspondingly, Indonesia announced the 2011 ‘Forest Moratorium’ (the Presidential Instruction No. 10/2011) which was valid for the following consecutive two years. By means of the 2011 ‘Forest Moratorium’, Indonesia aimed at significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation, forest degradation and peatland conversion. In so doing, it also sought to improve forest governance. Meanwhile, concerned stakeholders also raised various questions about the effectiveness of the ‘Forest Moratorium’. As an extension of the 2011 ‘Forest Moratorium’, Indonesia announced the 2013 ‘Forest Moratorium’(the Presidential Instruction No. 6/2013) for another two-year period on 13 May 2013. Indonesia's ‘Forest Moratorium’ is concerned with stakeholders at various levels, who may play a role of significant ‘agent’ in the process of implementing the ‘Forest Moratorium’. This mechanism of the ‘Forest Moratorium’ should be understood in the light of forest governance. Employing stakeholder approach, therefore, this article attempts to analyze Indonesia's ‘Forest Moratorium’ in the light of forest governance. In this regard, it analyzes the detailed contents of the ‘Forest Moratorium’, the process of making the ‘Forest Moratorium’, current development of the Indicative Moratorium Map for suspension of new concessions on forest land, and contesting views of various stakeholders. At the same time, it also talks about how ‘weak’ forest governance had influence upon Indonesia's ‘Forest Moratorium’. In so doing, this article consequently attempts to evaluate Indonesia's ‘Forest Moratorium’ and also put it into perspective in terms of improving forest governance. The 2013 ‘Forest Moratorium’ fundamentally represents a radical policy that is designed to suspend new concessions on forest conversion for another two-year period and its detailed contents attempt to reflect on various stakeholders from related industries and environmental NGOs. However, there are challenging factors in the process of implementing the ‘Forest Moratorium’, that is, ‘weak' forest governance and also a discrepancy between forest planning maps designated by central and regional governments. The announcement of the 2013 ‘Forest Moratorium’, as an extension of the 2011 ‘Forest Moratorium’, may functionally strengthen and improve Indonesia's forest governance. However, at the same time, there is a practical limit due to the fact that it is merely a Presidential Instruction that lacks legal binding.
Abstract
In May 2010, Indonesia and Norway signed a Letter of Intent on “Cooperation on Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation(REDD).” In the LoI, Norway agreed to offer Indonesia a sum of USD 1 billion with a view to encourage Indonesia to significantly contribute to the successful implementation of REDD+. On 20 May 2011, correspondingly, Indonesia announced the 2011 ‘Forest Moratorium’ (the Presidential Instruction No. 10/2011) which was valid for the following consecutive two years. By means of the 2011 ‘Forest Moratorium’, Indonesia aimed at significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation, forest degradation and peatland conversion. In so doing, it also sought to improve forest governance. Meanwhile, concerned stakeholders also raised various questions about the effectiveness of the ‘Forest Moratorium’. As an extension of the 2011 ‘Forest Moratorium’, Indonesia announced the 2013 ‘Forest Moratorium’(the Presidential Instruction No. 6/2013) for another two-year period on 13 May 2013. Indonesia's ‘Forest Moratorium’ is concerned with stakeholders at various levels, who may play a role of significant ‘agent’ in the process of implementing the ‘Forest Moratorium’. This mechanism of the ‘Forest Moratorium’ should be understood in the light of forest governance. Employing stakeholder approach, therefore, this article attempts to analyze Indonesia's ‘Forest Moratorium’ in the light of forest governance. In this regard, it analyzes the detailed contents of the ‘Forest Moratorium’, the process of making the ‘Forest Moratorium’, current development of the Indicative Moratorium Map for suspension of new concessions on forest land, and contesting views of various stakeholders. At the same time, it also talks about how ‘weak’ forest governance had influence upon Indonesia's ‘Forest Moratorium’. In so doing, this article consequently attempts to evaluate Indonesia's ‘Forest Moratorium’ and also put it into perspective in terms of improving forest governance. The 2013 ‘Forest Moratorium’ fundamentally represents a radical policy that is designed to suspend new concessions on forest conversion for another two-year period and its detailed contents attempt to reflect on various stakeholders from related industries and environmental NGOs. However, there are challenging factors in the process of implementing the ‘Forest Moratorium’, that is, ‘weak' forest governance and also a discrepancy between forest planning maps designated by central and regional governments. The announcement of the 2013 ‘Forest Moratorium’, as an extension of the 2011 ‘Forest Moratorium’, may functionally strengthen and improve Indonesia's forest governance. However, at the same time, there is a practical limit due to the fact that it is merely a Presidential Instruction that lacks legal binding.
참고문헌 (66)
- 강승훈, "이해관계자 어떻게 관리 할 것인가", LG 주간경제, 749, 30~34 (2003)
- 김소형, "환경경영 전략유형에 따른 이해관계자 중요성 및 성과 차이에 관한 연구", ECO, 13(2), pp.209~234 (2009), 한국환경사회학회
- 남상민, "기업, 환경 그리고 이해관계자집단 : 기업관점에서 이해관계자집단에 대한 생태적, 전략적 접근을 위한 토대, 전략, 영향을 중심으로", 경상논총, 21(1), pp.81~108 (2003), 한독경상학회
- 남상민, "해외산림투자 실무가이드-인도네시아편-" (2013), 녹색사업단
- 라미경, "거버넌스 연구의 현재적 쟁점", 한국거버넌스학회보, 16(3), pp.91~107 (2009), 한국거버넌스학회
- 박종일, "환경갈등에 대한 로컬 거버넌스적 분석: 새만금 간척사업을 중심으로", 월간자치발전, pp.165~171 (2007), 한국자치발전연구원
- 배재수, "인도네시아의 REDD+ 전략 평가를 위한 기준 개발", 한국임학회지, 101(4), pp.606~612 (2012), 한국임학회
- 배재수, "산림·임업 용어사전" (2011), 산림청·한국임학회
- 염종호, "산림행정 거버넌스 구축방안에 관한 연구 : 정책과정에서의 시민참여에 관한 사례분석을 중심으로", 석사, 공공행정, pp.2006
- Affif, Suraya, Kussarianto, "Kajian Para Pihak Terkait dengan Upaya Pengurangan Emisi dari Deforestasi dan Degradasi Hutan di Kalimantan Tengah" (2011), Kemitraan
- Boer, Rizalidi. Sulistyowati, "Summary for policy makers: Indonesia Second National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC)", Ministry of Enviroment, Republic of Indonesia, ~ (2009)
- Cerbu, Gillian A., "Location REDD: A global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities", Environmental Science and Policy, 14(2), pp.168~180 (2011)
- Edward, David P, "Indonesia’s REDD+ pact: Saving imperilled forests or business as usual?", Biological Conservation, 151, pp.41~44 (2012)
- Freeman, Edward, "Strategic management: A stakeholder approach" (1984), Pitman
- "Letter of Intent(LoI): Cooperation on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from defore station and forest degradation" (2010)[URL]
- Gomes, Ricardo Corrêa, "Proposing a theoretical framework to investigate the relationships between an organization and its environment", Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 11(1), pp.75~95 (2007)
- Indrarto, Giorgio B, "Konteks REDD+ di Indonesia: Pemicu, pelaku, dan lembaganya" (2013), CIFOR
- Jary, David, "Collins Dictionary of Sociology" (2000), HarperCollins Publishers
- Kementerian Pertanian, "Keputusan Menteri Pertanian No.357", Kpts, 5, pp.2002. Pedoman Perizinan Usaha Perkebunan[DOI]
- Kementan, "Peraturan Menteri Pertanian(Permentan) No.14", Permentan, 2009. P-edoman Pemanfaatan Lahan Gambut untuk Budidaya Kelapa Sawit, 2009[DOI]
- Kementerian Kehutanan, "Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No.P.36", Menhut-II, atau Penyimpanan Karbon pada Hutan Produksi dan Hutan Lindung (2009), 2009[DOI]
- Kemenhut, "Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan P.18", Menhut-II, pp.2011 (2011), ~
- Kemenhut, "Keputusan Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia No: SK.323", Menhut-II, pp.2011 (2011), ~
- Kemenhut, "Keputusan Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia No: SK.7416", Menhut-VII, 2011. Penetapan Peta Indikatif Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru Pemanfaatan Hutan, Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan dan Perubahan Peruntukan Kawasan Hutan dan Areal Penggunaan Lain, 2011[DOI]
- Kemenhut, "Menteri Kehutanan menetapkan Hasil Revisi I atas Peta Indikatif Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru(PIPIB)", Press Release, ~ (2011)
- Kemenhut, "Keputusan Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia No: SK.2771", Menhut-VII, 2012. Penetapan Peta Indikatif Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru Pemanfaatan Hutan, Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan dan Perubahan Peruntukan Kawasan Hutan dan Areal Penggunaan Lain, 2012[DOI]
- Kemenhut, "Keputusan Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia No: SK.6315", Menhut-VII, 2012. Penetapan Peta Indikatif Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru Pemanfaatan Hutan, Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan dan Perubahan Peruntukan Kawasan Hutan dan Areal Penggunaan Lain, 2012[DOI]
- Kemenhut, "Menteri Kehutanan menetapkan Hasil Revisi II atas Peta Indikatif Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru(PIPIB)", Press Release, ~ (2012)
- Kemenhut, "Menteri Kehutanan menetapkan Hasil Revisi III atas Peta Indikatif Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru(PIPIB)", Press Release, ~ (2012)
- Kemenhut, "Kementerian Kehutanan menetapkan Peta Indikatif Penundaan Izin Baru(PIPIB)", Press Release, ~ (2013)
- Kemenhut, "Keputusan Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia No: SK.2796", Menhut-VII, 2013. Penetapan Peta Indikatif Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru Pemanfaatan Hutan, Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan dan Perubahan Peruntukan Kawasan Hutan dan Areal Penggunaan Lain, 2013[DOI]
- "Indonesia delays moratorium on forest concessions" (2011)[URL]
- Investing in a more sustainable Indonesia: Country Environmental Analysis, "Leitmann, Josef", The World Bank Group, ~, pp.CEA Seris Report No. 50762-ID (2009)
- Maria, Brockhaus, "An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: Is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+?", Forest Policy and Economics, 18, pp.30~37 (2012)
- Studi Lituratur Pembiayaan Perubahan Iklim di Indonesia: Pemetaan Sumber, Mekanisme Penyaluran dan Penerima Manfaat Dana-Dana Terkait Perubahan Iklim, "Muchtar, Adinda T", The Indonesian Institute, ~ (2012)
- Murdiyarso, Daniel, "Moratorium Hutan Indonesia-Batu Loncatan untuk Memperbaiki Tata Kelola Hutan?" (2011), CIFOR
- Republic of Indonesia, "Keputusan Presiden No.32 Tahun 1990. Pengelolaan Kawasan Hutan", ~ (1990)
- RoI, "Peraturan Pemerintah. No.40 Tahun 1996. Hak Guna Usaha, Hak Guna Bangunan dan Hak Pakai atas Tanah", ~ (1996)
- RoI, "Instruksi Presiden Nomor 10 Tahun 2011. Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru dan Penyempurnaan Tata Kelola Hutan Alam Primer dan Lahan Gambut", ~ (2011)
- RoI, "Peraturan Pemerintah. No.27 Tahun 2012. Izin Lingkungan", ~ (2012)
- RoI, "Instruksi Presiden Nomor 6 Tahun 2013. Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru dan Penyempurnaan Tata Kelola Hutan Alam Primer dan Lahan Gambut", ~ (2013)
- "Revisi PIPIB IV, Hutan Primer dan Gambut Susut Hampir 165 Ribu Hektar" (2013)[URL]
- Satuan Tugas Persiapan Pembentukan Kelembagaan REDD+, "REDD+ dan Satgas Kelembagaan REDD+ Sebuah Pengantar", ~ (2011)
- Satuan Tugas Persiapan Pembentukan Kelembagaan REDD+, "Laporan Pengelolaan Keuangan Dana Hibah Norwegia Melalui Pengelolaan UNDP(Untuk periode yang berakhir 30 Juni 2012)", ~ (2012)
- Satgas REDD+, "Pendekatan Multidoor dalam penegakan hukum terkait perkara sumber daya alam-lingkungan hidup di atas hutan dan lahan gambut", ~ (2013)
- Satgas REDD+, "Executive Summary Pedoman Penanganan Perkara Multidoor Ka-sus Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan Hidup", ~ (2013)
- Savage, Grant T, "Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders", Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), pp.61~75 (1991)
- Situmorang, Abdul W, "Indeks Tata Kelola Hutan, Lahan, Dan REDD+ 2012 di Indonesia", UNDP Inonesia, ~ (2013)
- Sloan, Sean, "Does Indonesia’s REDD+ moratorium on new concessions spare imminently threatened forest?", Conservation Letters, 5, pp.222~231 (2012)
- Real-time evaluation of Norway’s international climate and forest initiative: Contributions to National REDD+ Processes 2007-2010, Country Report: Indonesia, "Tipper, Richard", Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, ~, pp.Evaluation Report 16 (2011), 2010
- "Indonesia akan perpanjangan moratorium hutan" (2013)[URL]
- "Seberapa mampu moratorium mengu rangi emisi dari deforesta-si?" (2013)[URL]
- Wells, Philip, "Sebuah Analisis Terhadap Instruksi Presiden No.10, 2011 Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru dan Penyempurnaan Tata Kelola Hutan Alam Primer dan Lahan Ga mbut", Daemeter Consulting, ~ (2011)
- Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing count ries: approaches to stimulate action, "Wells, Philip", United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, ~ (2007)
- Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth sessi-on, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009, "Wells, Philip", United Nations Framework Convention o-n Climate Change, ~ (2009)
- Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Main report. FAO Forestry Paper, "Wells, Philip", United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization, ~ (2010)
- Wells, Philip, "Indonesia’s greenhouse gas abatement cost curve" (2010), Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim
- Wells, Philip, "Menuju Ketunggalan Data dan Peta", UPK4 November 20. Press Release, ~ (2012)
- "Susun RTRW dulu sebelum moratorium hutan" (2010)[URL]
- "Tata Kelola Hutan Banyak Draf Moratorium Hutan yang Besar" (2011)[URL]
- Wells, Philip, "The Economic Benefit of Palm Oil to Indonesia" (2011), World Growth
- "Indonesia akan lanjutkan moratorium konversi hutan alam primer dan gambut" (2013)[URL]
- "Kasus Lingkungan ditangani secara ‘Multi-Door’" (2013)[URL]
- "Moratorium harus diikuti sanksi" (2013)[URL]
- "Pemerintah Fokus Benahi Tata Kelola Hutan" (2013)[URL]