본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

茶山≪大學≫觀的理路構建硏究(1) − 以太學觀、格致六條爲中心 −

Research on the construction of Tasan's view of Daxue(1) - Focusing on the view of Taixue and Gezhi Liutiao

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류철학

초록

≪大學≫作為四書之一, 其歷史地位不言而喻, 但在長期的解經注經過程中, 諸家各成一言, 造就了各具特色的≪大學≫學說。 其中, 朱子的≪大學≫觀對後世產生了最為深遠的影響, 而茶山則打破常規, 推翻朱子傾入大量心血在≪大學章句≫中提出的≪大學≫觀以及所構建的“三綱領、八條目”、“修己、治人”體系, 基於古本≪大學≫展開研究並添加了注釋, 構建起了基於自身思考的基本理路。 就“太學觀”而言, 茶山把“大學”理解為“太學”, 主張≪大學≫的主要對象主體是冑子, “治國、平天下之道”即“大學之道”, 提出了以具體的實踐和“治理之道”為主要內容的太學論。 這就決定了茶山≪大學≫觀的展開方向, 為茶山≪大學≫觀理路的構建奠定了政治學基調。 就“格致六條”觀點而言, 是茶山向朱子“三綱領”、“八條目”≪大學≫觀理路的質疑與挑戰。 首先, 茶山打破了朱子將≪大學≫的中心從“誠意”轉移到“格物致知”的觀點, 主張“治國平天下”為≪大學≫之主。 其次, 具體就“八條目”而言, 茶山雖然承認了八個條目的存在, 但卻主張格物、致知是誠意、正心、修身、齊家、治國、平天下之事的事前準備, 格物、致知與其它六目並非並列的關係, 因而將後六者合稱為“格致六條”, 這也構成了茶山關於八綱領的獨到見解。 另外, 茶山繼承鄭玄、孔穎達將“誠意”作為≪大學≫之核心問題的觀點, 凸顯了“誠”的重要性, 主張“誠”貫穿物之始終, 是實踐貫穿≪大學≫始終之孝弟慈的妙理方略, “每依於行事”, “每附於人倫”, 強調“誠”必須結合孝悌慈的實踐。 通過以上探討可見, 通過對≪大學≫之對象範圍以及目標追求的不同設定, 茶山構建起了與朱子大放異彩的≪大學≫觀, 突顯了≪大學≫作為帝王尋求治國平天下政治哲學理念的“政治之書”的作用, 呈現了自身思想中實事求是、經世致用的實學特徵。

Abstract

As one of the Four Books, Daxue has its historical status. However, in the long-term process of interpreting and annotating the classics, each school has its own words, which has created its unique theories of Daxue. Among them, Zhu Xi's Daxue view has the most profound impact on later generations, while Tasan broke the Convention and overturned the Daxue view put forward by Zhu Xi in the Daxue Zhangju that contains the system of "three programs, eight items", "self-cultivation and management of people". Also, based on the ancient book Daxue, Tasan also carried out research and added annotations to build an ideological system based on its thinking. As far as the Taixue view is concerned, Tasan understood "Daxue" as "Taixue", advocated that the main object of "Daxue" is Zhou Zi, and that "the way of governing the country and stabilising the world" is "the way of Daxue ", and put forward the Taixue theory with specific practice and "governance" as the main content. This determined the direction of Tasan's "Daxue" view and set the tone of political science for the construction of Tasan's "Daxue" view. As far as the viewpoint of "Gezhi Liutiao" is concerned, it is Tasan's query and challenge to Zhu Xi's "three programs" and "eight items" of "Daxue". First of all, Tasan broke Zhu Xi's view that shifting the focus of Daxue from "Chengyi" to "Gewu Zhizhi", and advocated "governing the country and making the world peaceful" as the main idea of the book. Secondly, in terms of "eight items", although Tasan has acknowledged the existence of the eight items, but argues that Gewu Zhizhi is the preparation of Chengyi, Zhengxin, Xiusheng, Qijia, Zhiguo, Pingtianxia. Gewu Zhizhi is not a parallel relation with the other six items. Therefore, the latter six items are collectively called "Gezhi Liutiao", which also constitutes Tasan's unique views on the eight items. In addition, Tasan inherited Zheng Xuan's and Kong Yingda's view that "Chengyi" is the core issue of Daxue, highlighting the importance of "Cheng". He also advocated that "Cheng" runs through all things, which is the wonderful strategy of filial piety that runs through the whole course of Daxue. And emphasized that "Cheng" must be combined with the practice of filial piety. Through the above discussion, it can be seen that through the different settings of the object scope and goal pursuit of Daxue, Tasan constructed a different view of Daxue from Zhu Xi, highlighted the role of Daxue as a "political book" where the emperor seeking the political philosophy of governing the country and stabilising the world and showed the practical characteristics of seeking truth from facts and being practical in its thoughts.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. "論語", ~
  2. "大學", ~
  3. "朱子語類", ~
  4. "四書章句集注", ~
  5. "四書或問", ~
  6. "十三經注疏", ~
  7. "與猶堂全書", ~
  8. 鄭炳連, "茶山四書學研究" (1994), 景仁出版社
  9. 鄭一均, "茶山四書經學研究" (2000), 一志社
  10. 李乙浩, "李乙浩全集Ⅱ:茶山學總論" (2000), 藝文書院
  11. 樸完植, "理論與實踐" (1993)
  12. 임헌규, "朱子와 茶山의 『大學』에 대한 관점 비교(1) : ‘大學’과 그 편제", 한국사상과 문화, (45), pp.257~285 (2008), 한국사상문화학회
  13. 林憲奎, "茶山關於朱子<大學>觀的批判(2)", 退溪學與儒教文化, 44 (2009)
  14. 鄭一均, "茶山四書經學研究" (2000), 一志社
  15. 김선경, "다산 정약용의 정치 철학: {대학공의} 읽기", 한국사상사학, (26), pp.303~342 (2006), 한국사상사학회
  16. 池俊浩, "茶山丁若鏞的大學觀研究", 韓國思想與文化, 22 (2003)
  17. 池俊浩, "通過<大學公議>看茶山丁若鏞的<大學>觀", 韓國哲學論集, 12 (2003)
  18. 朱人求, "下學而上達—朱子小學與大學的貫通", 江南大學學報(人文社會科學版) (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)