본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

아세안+3 지역 경제통합의 조건과 발전 과정

Conditions and a Process of Development for Economic Integration in ASEAN+3

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

This paper intends to examine why the financial cooperation is prominently advanced and the trade collaboration is stunted in the ASEAN+3 region. Three factors are presented in order to illuminate the main question: institutional frameworks, decision-making of regional leaders and external challenges. Institutional frameworks can be including regional organizations, institutions or multilateral agreements which have primary purposes on economic cooperation since the WTO system was built. In the ASEAN+3 region, the fact that the ASEAN+3 summit became a regularized annual meeting has consolidated the institutional framework in the region. Although the attempt to build the East Asia Economic Caucus was failed, that played a role in the blueprint of ASEAN+3 summit. The legacy has constantly continued as Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization. Generally, regional leaders seek the national economic profit to take economic risk aversion. No matter how proper the intention is, it is hard to achieve the regional economic integration if the influence of states and leaders is not considered. It is notable that the ASEAN+3 summit was successfully settled after China, Japan and South Korea positively participated in the meeting. The Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s is a representative economic external challenge on the region. After the crisis, the regional economy was bound together into a financial cooperation, and the regional liquidity fund, named Chiang Mai Initiative, was created as a starting point of regional economic integration. Whereas financial integration developed rapidly in the ASEAN+3 region, there was no remarkable momentum to stimulate the regional trade cooperation. Those three factors does not affect the regional economic integration respectively. Institutional frameworks were based on the economic integration, and decision-making of regional leaders gave the direction of the integration: finance or trade. The external challenge of the Asian financial crisis provides Asian countries with the most significant stimulation, but the importance of the external challenge cannot lessen the influence of two factors in economic integration.

Abstract

This paper intends to examine why the financial cooperation is prominently advanced and the trade collaboration is stunted in the ASEAN+3 region. Three factors are presented in order to illuminate the main question: institutional frameworks, decision-making of regional leaders and external challenges. Institutional frameworks can be including regional organizations, institutions or multilateral agreements which have primary purposes on economic cooperation since the WTO system was built. In the ASEAN+3 region, the fact that the ASEAN+3 summit became a regularized annual meeting has consolidated the institutional framework in the region. Although the attempt to build the East Asia Economic Caucus was failed, that played a role in the blueprint of ASEAN+3 summit. The legacy has constantly continued as Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization. Generally, regional leaders seek the national economic profit to take economic risk aversion. No matter how proper the intention is, it is hard to achieve the regional economic integration if the influence of states and leaders is not considered. It is notable that the ASEAN+3 summit was successfully settled after China, Japan and South Korea positively participated in the meeting. The Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s is a representative economic external challenge on the region. After the crisis, the regional economy was bound together into a financial cooperation, and the regional liquidity fund, named Chiang Mai Initiative, was created as a starting point of regional economic integration. Whereas financial integration developed rapidly in the ASEAN+3 region, there was no remarkable momentum to stimulate the regional trade cooperation. Those three factors does not affect the regional economic integration respectively. Institutional frameworks were based on the economic integration, and decision-making of regional leaders gave the direction of the integration: finance or trade. The external challenge of the Asian financial crisis provides Asian countries with the most significant stimulation, but the importance of the external challenge cannot lessen the influence of two factors in economic integration.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. "2010년 3월 24일 CMI 다자화 출범", 기획재정부 보도자료 12월 28일, ~ (2009)
  2. 박번순, "동남아의 경제성장과 발전전략. In: 동남아 경제의 발전요인과 특성" (2004), 서울: 오름
  3. "中-아세안 FTA 출발부터 ‘삐그덕’", 서울신문 1월 14일, ~ (2010)
  4. "AFTA, 비관세 장벽으로 파행 가능성 예고", 연합뉴스 1월 5일, ~ (2002)
  5. 이요한, "동남아의 경제성장과 발전전략. In: ASEAN 경제협력의 발전과정: 성과와 한계" (2004), 서울: 오름
  6. 정태인, "가트 역사에 비춰 본 우루과이 라운드의 성격", 동향과 전망, 21 (1994)
  7. "한·중·일 ‘亞 금융패권’ 싸고 치열한 힘겨루기", 한국경제 5월 5일, ~ (2011)
  8. Amyx, Jennifer, "What Motivates Regional Financial Cooperation in East Asia Today", Asia Pacific, (76) (2005), East-West Center
  9. Balassa, Bela, "The Theory of Economic Integration" (1962), London: Routledge
  10. Baylis, John, "The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations" (2001), New York: Oxford University Press
  11. Beeson, Mark, "Mahathir and the Markets: Globalisation and the Pursuit of Economic Autonomy in Malaysia", Pacific Affairs, 73(3) (2000)
  12. Bloomberg Businessweek, "BOE’s King Says ‘Very Clear’ That Euro Area Needs Fiscal Union", May 12, ~ (2010)
  13. "THE CHANGING POLITICAL DYNAMICS OF EAST ASIAN FINANCIAL COOPERATION The Chiang Mai Initiative", ASIAN SURVEY, 49(3), pp.450~467 (2009), UNIV CALIFORNIA PRESS
  14. Dieter, Heribert, "Exploring Alternative Theories of Economic Regionalism: From Trade to Finance in Asian Co-operation", Review of International Political Economy, 10(3) (2003)
  15. "Final Report of the East Asia Study Group"[URL]
  16. Eichengreen, Barry, "The International Monetary Fund in the Wake of the Asian Crisis. In: The Asian Financial Crisis and the Architecture of Global Finance" (2000), New York: Cambridge University Press
  17. Hayashi, Shigeko, "Japan and East Asian Monetary Regionalism: Towards a Proactive Leadership Role" (2006), New York: Routledge
  18. ASEAN Economic Integration: Features, Fulfillments, Failures and the Future, "Hill, Hal", ~, pp.ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration 69 (2010)
  19. Politics that Constrains: The Logic of Fragmented Regionalism in East Asia, "Katada, Saori", ~, pp.EAI Fellows Working Paper Series 21 (2009)
  20. Kawai, Masahiro, "East Asian Economic Regionalism: Progressand Challenges. In: International Economic Integration and Asia" (2006), Singapore: World Scientific
  21. Kawai, Masahiro, "Free Trade Agreements in East Asia: A Way toward Trade Liberalization", ADB Briefs, 1 (2010)
  22. Lee, Shin-wha, "Building a Northeast Asian Community: A Multilateral Security Approach. In: Advancing East Asian Regionalism" (2007), London: Routledge
  23. Lynch, Frances, "Resolving the Paradox of the Monnet Plan: National and International Planning in French Reconstruction", The Economic History Review, New Series, 37(2) (1984)
  24. MacIntyre, Andrew, T. J. Pempel, "East Asia in the Wake of the Financial Crisis. In: Crisis as Catalyst: Asia’s Dynamic Political Economy" (2008), Ithaca: Cornell University Press
  25. Mirus, Rolf, "Economic Integration: Free Trade Areas vs. Customs Unions" (2001), Western Centre for Economic Research
  26. Munakata, Naoko, "Transforming East Asia: The Evolution of Regional Economic Integration" (2006), Washington: Brookings Institution Press
  27. Noble, Gregory, "Causes and Consequences of the Asian Financial Crisis. In: The Asian Financial Crisis and the Architecture of Global Finance" (2000), New York: Cambridge University Press
  28. Pempel, T. J, "Restructing Regional Ties. In: Crisis as Catalyst: Asia’s Dynamic Political Economy" (2008), Ithaca: Cornell University Press
  29. Pomfret, Richard, "Sequencing Regional Integration in Asia. In: International Economic Integration and Asia" (2006), Singapore: World Scientific
  30. Rozman, Gilbert, "동북아시아 지역주의" (2007), 서울: 박영사
  31. Sohn, Injoo, "Learning to Co-operate: China’s Multilateral Approach to Asian Financial Co-operation", The China Quarterly, 194 (2008)
  32. Stubbs, Richard, "ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism", Asian Survey, 42(3) (2002)
  33. Wong, John, "China-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Shaping Future Economic Relations", Asian Survey, 43(3) (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)