본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea6) - Part 2: 기후모의 평균 오차 특성 분석

The KMA Global Seasonal forecasting system (GloSea6) - Part 2: Climatological Mean Bias Characteristics

박형식|김지영|김혜리|이상민|최유나|임소민|박연희|류영|신범철|지희숙|부경온|황승언|이조한|현유경|추성호|현승훤
한국기상학회 (Korean Meteorological Society)|2022.06|대기 (Atmosphere)|제32권 제2호|pp. 87-101|DOI 10.14191/Atmos.2022.32.1.001

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

BiasSeasonal forecastingGloSea6Climate prediction systemHindcast
주제분류대기과학

초록

In this paper, the performance improvement for the new KMA’s Climate Prediction System (GloSea6), which has been built and tested in 2021, is presented by assessing the bias distribution of basic variables from 24 years of GloSea6 hindcasts. Along with the upgrade from GloSea5 to GloSea6, the performance of GloSea6 can be regarded as notable in many respects: improvements in (i) negative bias of geopotential height over the tropical and mid-latitude troposphere and over polar stratosphere in boreal summer; (ii) cold bias of tropospheric temperature; (iii) underestimation of mid-latitude jets; (iv) dry bias in the lower troposphere; (v) cold tongue bias in the equatorial SST and the warm bias of Southern Ocean, suggesting the potential of improvements to the major climate variability in GloSea6. The warm surface temperature in the northern hemisphere continent in summer is eliminated by using CDF-matched soil-moisture initials. However, the cold bias in high latitude snow-covered area in winter still needs to be improved in the future. The intensification of the westerly winds of the summer Asian monsoon and the weakening of the northwest Pacific high, which are considered to be major errors in the GloSea system, had not been significantly improved. However, both the use of increased number of ensembles and the initial conditions at the closest initial dates reveals possibility to improve these biases. It is also noted that the effect of ensemble expansion mainly contributes to the improvement of annual variability over high latitudes and polar regions.

Abstract

In this paper, the performance improvement for the new KMA’s Climate Prediction System (GloSea6), which has been built and tested in 2021, is presented by assessing the bias distribution of basic variables from 24 years of GloSea6 hindcasts. Along with the upgrade from GloSea5 to GloSea6, the performance of GloSea6 can be regarded as notable in many respects: improvements in (i) negative bias of geopotential height over the tropical and mid-latitude troposphere and over polar stratosphere in boreal summer; (ii) cold bias of tropospheric temperature; (iii) underestimation of mid-latitude jets; (iv) dry bias in the lower troposphere; (v) cold tongue bias in the equatorial SST and the warm bias of Southern Ocean, suggesting the potential of improvements to the major climate variability in GloSea6. The warm surface temperature in the northern hemisphere continent in summer is eliminated by using CDF-matched soil-moisture initials. However, the cold bias in high latitude snow-covered area in winter still needs to be improved in the future. The intensification of the westerly winds of the summer Asian monsoon and the weakening of the northwest Pacific high, which are considered to be major errors in the GloSea system, had not been significantly improved. However, both the use of increased number of ensembles and the initial conditions at the closest initial dates reveals possibility to improve these biases. It is also noted that the effect of ensemble expansion mainly contributes to the improvement of annual variability over high latitudes and polar regions.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Robert Adler, "The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Analysis (New Version 2.3) and a Review of 2017 Global Precipitation", Atmosphere, 9(4), pp.138~ (2018), MDPI AG[DOI]
  2. Min‐Seop Ahn, "MJO Propagation Across the Maritime Continent: Are CMIP6 Models Better Than CMIP5 Models?", Geophysical Research Letters, 47(11) (2020), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
  3. Alberto Arribas, "The GloSea4 Ensemble Prediction System for Seasonal Forecasting", Monthly Weather Review, 139(6), pp.1891~1910 (2011), American Meteorological Society[DOI]
  4. I. A. Boutle, "Spatial variability of liquid cloud and rain: observations and microphysical effects", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 140(679), pp.583~594 (2013), Wiley[DOI]
  5. 장필훈, "기상청 전지구 해양자료동화시스템(GODAPS): 개요 및 검증", 대기, 31(2), pp.229~240 (2021), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  6. Davis, P., "2020 : A large ensemble seasonal forecasting system : GloSea6", AGU Fall Meeting 2020, #A192-05 (2020), American Geophysical Union
  7. D. P. Dee, "The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(656), pp.553~597 (2011), Wiley[DOI]
  8. Alex O. Gonzalez, "Winter mean lower tropospheric moisture over the Maritime Continent as a climate model diagnostic metric for the propagation of the Madden‐Julian oscillation", Geophysical Research Letters, 44(5), pp.2588~2596 (2017), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
  9. 현유경, "현 기후예측시스템에서의 기온과 강수 계절 확률 예측 신뢰도 평가", 대기, 30(2), pp.141~154 (2020), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  10. Daehyun Kang, "The Role of Background Meridional Moisture Gradient on the Propagation of the MJO over the Maritime Continent", Journal of Climate, pp.1~54 (2021), American Meteorological Society[DOI]
  11. Hyemi Kim, "MJO Propagation Processes and Mean Biases in the SubX and S2S Reforecasts", Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124(16), pp.9314~9331 (2019), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
  12. 김혜리, "기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea6) - Part 1: 운영 체계 및 개선 사항", 대기, 31(3), pp.341~359 (2021), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  13. 김지영, "Global Coupled (GC) 모델 개선에 따른 동아시아 여름 몬순 모의성능 평가", 대기, 31(5), pp.563~576 (2021), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  14. 김상욱, "GloSea5 모형의 계절내-계절(S2S) 예측성 검정: Part 1. 북반구 중위도 지위고도", 대기, 28(3), pp.233~245 (2018), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  15. "Long-range Forecast Work Manual" (2015)[URL]
  16. 이소정, "기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea5)의 여름철 동아시아 몬순 지수 예측 성능 평가", 대기, 30(3), pp.293~309 (2020), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  17. 임소민, "현업 기후예측시스템에서의 지면초기화 적용에 따른 예측 민감도 분석", 대기, 31(3), pp.327~340 (2021), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  18. C. MacLachlan, "Global Seasonal forecast system version 5 (GloSea5): a high-resolution seasonal forecast system", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 141(689), pp.1072~1084 (2014), Wiley[DOI]
  19. A. Megann, "GO5.0: the joint NERC–Met Office NEMO global ocean model for use in coupled and forced applications", Geoscientific Model Development, 7(3), pp.1069~1092 (2014), Copernicus GmbH[DOI]
  20. 박연희, "기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea5)의 과거기후장 앙상블 확대에 따른 예측성능 평가", 대기, 31(5), pp.511~523 (2021), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  21. Rae, J. G. L., "Development of the Global Sea Ice 6.0 CICE configuration for the Met Office Global Coupled model", Geosci. Model Dev, 8, pp.2221~2230 (2015)[DOI]
  22. N. A. Rayner, "Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century", Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(D14) (2003), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
  23. Jeff K. Ridley, "The sea ice model component of HadGEM3-GC3.1", Geoscientific Model Development, 11(2), pp.713~723 (2018), Copernicus GmbH[DOI]
  24. A. A. Scaife, "Skillful long‐range prediction of European and North American winters", Geophysical Research Letters, 41(7), pp.2514~2519 (2014), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
  25. 서은교, "전지구 계절 예측 시스템의 토양수분 초기화 방법 개선", 대기, 26(1), pp.35~45 (2016), 한국기상학회
  26. Eunkyo Seo, "Impact of soil moisture initialization on boreal summer subseasonal forecasts: mid-latitude surface air temperature and heat wave events", Climate Dynamics, 52(3-4), pp.1695~1709 (2018), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  27. Storkey, D., "UK Global Ocean GO6and GO7 : a traceable hierarchy of model resolutions", Geosci. Model Dev, 11, pp.3187~3213 (2018)[DOI]
  28. Jennifer Waters, "Implementing a variational data assimilation system in an operational 1", 4 degree global ocean model, 2014, pp.141(687), 333~349[DOI]
  29. David Walters, "The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 6.0", 6.1 and JULES Global Land 6.0, Geoscientific Model Development, pp.2017, 10(4)[DOI]
  30. Walters, D., "The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0", 7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations, 2019, pp.12, 1909~1963
  31. K. D. Williams, "The Met Office Global Coupled Model 3.0 and 3.1 (GC3.0 and GC3.1) Configurations", Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 10(2), pp.357~380 (2018), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
  32. Young-Min Yang, "Diagnosing ISO Forecast from GloSea5 Using Dynamic-Oriented ISO Theory", Atmosphere, 12(1), pp.114~ (2021), MDPI AG[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea6) 과거기후 예측장의앙상블 확대와 초기시간 변화에 따른 예측 특성 분석김지영, 박연희, 이조한, 지희숙, 현유경한국기상학회 · 대기2022 · 제32권 제4호기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea6) - Part 1: 운영 체계 및 개선 사항김혜리, 이조한, 현유경, 황승언한국기상학회 · 대기2021 · 제31권 제3호WMO LC-LRF 검증 지수를 활용한 기후예측시스템(GloSea6)의 계절예측 성능 비교 평가김지영, 김형진, 박연희, 박진경, 부경온, 신범철, 이상민, 이조한, 이현주, 지희숙, 현유경한국기상학회 · 대기2024 · 제34권 제4호기상청 기후예측시스템 개선에 따른 월별 앙상블 예측자료 성능평가김윤재, 이상민, 함현준, 현유경한국기상학회 · 대기2019 · 제29권 제2호기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea5)의 과거기후장 앙상블 확대에 따른 예측성능 평가박연희, 지희숙, 허솔잎, 현유경한국기상학회 · 대기2021 · 제31권 제5호GloSea5 모형의 한반도 인근 해수면 온도 예측성 평가: 편차 보정에 따른 개선강동우, 부경온, 손석우, 이조한, 조형오, 현유경한국기상학회 · 대기2021 · 제31권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

종관 환경 변화에 따른 아격자 산악모수화와 고해상도 지면 자료가 WRF 모델의 바람장 모의에 미치는 영향신혜윰, 임종명, 장은철, 이준홍, 임교선, 김기병, 이현지pp. 103-1182015년~2021년 한반도 고농도 미세먼지 사례의 유형분류에 따른 기상학적 특징 분석김유준, 박승식, 조창래, 지준범pp. 119-133대기의 강이 한반도 지역별 강수에 미치는 영향김진원, 차은정, 박찬일, 손석우, 백승윤, 권예은pp. 135-148황사장기예측자료를 이용한 봄철 황사 발생 예측 특성 분석강미선, 부경온, 이우정, 장필훈, 김미경pp. 149-162도플러 라이다를 이용한 ICE-POP 2018 기간 수평바람 연직 프로파일 산출 및 정확도 평가백승우, 이규원, 류근수, 김권일, 신규희pp. 163-178
원문 보기