본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Impacts of Mandated Audit Communication on Audit Hour, Audit Fee and Firm’s Earnings Management

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

[Purpose] After some large accounting scandals happened, it is required for regulatory authorities to strengthen the role of firm’s internal monitoring system to prevent accounting fraud. In this regard, the External Auditing Act was amended in May 2014 to encourage audit committee or board of directors of audited firm and external auditors to discuss the timing and method of external audit and to exchange related information. Thus, this paper analyzes the effects of mandated communication between external auditors and audit committee or board of directors on audit hour, audit fee and firm’s earnings management. [Methodology] The data of non-financial Korean firms between 2014 and 2016 is used to analyze how the communication between external auditors and audit committee or board of directors of the audited firm affects audit hour, audit fee, and firm’s earnings management after the enactment of the External Auditing Act. [Findings] We find that as the communication between the external auditor and audit committee or board of directors become more active, audit hour and audit fees increase, and the firm’s earnings management decrease. This result implies that the communication between external auditor and audit committee or board of directors of audited firm contributes to enhancing the audit quality by increasing the audit hour and audit fees. However, this results is applicable for firms that are audited by non-big4 auditors. [Implications] Therefore, this study suggests the mandated audit communication as an indicator for the independence of audit committee or board of directors and provides useful guidelines for the regulatory authorities.

Abstract

[Purpose] After some large accounting scandals happened, it is required for regulatory authorities to strengthen the role of firm’s internal monitoring system to prevent accounting fraud. In this regard, the External Auditing Act was amended in May 2014 to encourage audit committee or board of directors of audited firm and external auditors to discuss the timing and method of external audit and to exchange related information. Thus, this paper analyzes the effects of mandated communication between external auditors and audit committee or board of directors on audit hour, audit fee and firm’s earnings management. [Methodology] The data of non-financial Korean firms between 2014 and 2016 is used to analyze how the communication between external auditors and audit committee or board of directors of the audited firm affects audit hour, audit fee, and firm’s earnings management after the enactment of the External Auditing Act. [Findings] We find that as the communication between the external auditor and audit committee or board of directors become more active, audit hour and audit fees increase, and the firm’s earnings management decrease. This result implies that the communication between external auditor and audit committee or board of directors of audited firm contributes to enhancing the audit quality by increasing the audit hour and audit fees. However, this results is applicable for firms that are audited by non-big4 auditors. [Implications] Therefore, this study suggests the mandated audit communication as an indicator for the independence of audit committee or board of directors and provides useful guidelines for the regulatory authorities.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Abbott, L. J., "Audit committee characteristics and restatements", Auditing : A journal of practice theory, 23(1), pp.69~87 (2004)
  2. Bae, G. S., "Audit hours and unit audit price of industry specialist auditors : Evidence from Korea", Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), pp.314~340 (2016)
  3. Beasley, M., "An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud", The Accounting Review, pp.443~465 (1996)
  4. Beasley, M. S., "Board independence and audit-firm type", Auditing : A journal of practice theory, 20(1), pp.97~114 (2001)
  5. Beasley, M. S., "The relationship between board characteristics and voluntary improvements in audit committee composition and experience", Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(4), pp.539~570 (2001)
  6. Becker, C. L., "The effect of audit quality on earnings management", Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), pp.1~24 (1998)
  7. Brickley, J. A., "The takeover market, corporate board composition, and ownership structure : The case of banking", The Journal of Law Economics, 30(1), pp.161~180 (1987)
  8. Byrd, J. W., "Do outside directors monitor managers? : Evidence from tender offer bids", Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), pp.195~221 (1992)
  9. Caramanis, C., "Audit effort and earnings management", Journal of Accounting Economics, 45(1), pp.116~138 (2008)
  10. Carcello, J. V., "Board characteristics and audit fees", Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), pp.365~384 (2002)
  11. Cassell, C. A., "The effect of corporate governance on auditor-client realignments", Auditing : A journal of practice theory, 31(2), pp.167~188 (2012)
  12. Chen, L. H., "Auditor attestation under SOX Section 404 and earnings informativeness", Auditing : A journal of practice theory, 32(1), pp.61~84 (2013)
  13. Cohen, J., "Corporate governance and the audit process", Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), pp.573~594 (2002)
  14. Daily, C. M., "Corporate governance digest", Business Horizons, 42(3), pp.2~5 (1999)
  15. Dechow, P. M., "Accounting earnings and cash flows as measure of firm performance : The role of accounting accruals", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(1), pp.3~42 (1994)
  16. Dechow, P. M., "Detecting earnings management", The Accounting Review, pp.193~225 (1995)
  17. DeFond, M., "A review of archival auditing research", Journal of Accounting Economics, 58(2-3), pp.275~326 (2014)
  18. DeFond, M. L., "Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors", The Accounting Review, pp.643~655 (1991)
  19. Eilifsen, A., "How increased regulatory oversight of nonaudit services affects investors’ perceptions of earnings quality", Auditing : A journal of practice theory, 32(1), pp.85~112 (2013)
  20. Fama, E. F., "Agency problems and residual claims", The Journal of Law Economics, 26(2), pp.327~349 (1983)
  21. Feroz, E. H., "The financial and market effects of the SEC’s accounting and auditing enforcement releases", Journal of Accounting Research, 29, pp.107~142 (1991)
  22. Francis, J., "The effect of audit firm size on audit prices : A study of the Australian market", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6, pp.145~157 (1984)
  23. Francis, J. R., "What do we know about audit quality?", The British Accoun tin g Review, 36(4), pp.345~368 (2004)
  24. Jensen, M. C., "The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems", The Journal of Finance, 48(3), pp.831~880 (1993)
  25. Klein, A., "Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management", Journal of Accounting Economics, 33(3), pp.375~400 (2002)
  26. 김종근, "외부감사인과 지배기구간 커뮤니케이션 빈도와 감사품질과의 관련성", 세무와회계저널, 21(3), pp.29~48 (2020), 한국세무학회
  27. Kothari, S. P., "Performance matched discretionary accrual measures", Journal of Accounting Economics, 39(1), pp.163~197 (2005)
  28. Krishnan, J., "Audit committee financial expertise, litigation risk, and corporate governance", Auditing : A journal of practice theory, 28(1), pp.241~261 (2009)
  29. Libby, R., "Does mandated audit communication reduce opportunistic corrections to manage earnings to forecasts?", The Accounting Review, 75(4), pp.383~404 (2000)
  30. Lys, T., "Lawsuits against auditors", Journal of Accounting Research, 32, pp.65~93 (1994)
  31. How are earnings managed? Examples from auditors, "Nelson, M. W.", ~ (2002)
  32. O’Keefe, T. B., "The production of audit services : evidence from a major public accounting firm", Journal of Accounting Research, 32, pp.241~261 (1994)
  33. Pae, S., "Strategic interaction in auditing : an analysis of auditors'legal liability, internal control system quality, and audit effort", The Accounting Review, 76(3), pp.333~356 (2001)
  34. Palmrose, Z. -V., "1987 Competitive Manuscript Co-Winner: An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality", The Accounting Review, pp.55~73 (1988)
  35. Pincus, K., "Voluntary formation of corporate audit committees among NASDAQ firms", Journal of Accounting Public Policy, 8(4), pp.239~265 (1989)
  36. Rosenstein, S., "Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth", Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), pp.175~191 (1990)
  37. 류승우, "감사시간과 내부심리시간이 감사품질(재량적 발생액)에 미치는 영향", 회계학연구, 40(4), pp.213~246 (2015), 한국회계학회
  38. Simunic, D., "The Pricing of Audit Service : Theory and Evidence", Journal of Accounting Research, 18(Spring), pp.161~190 (1980)
  39. Simunic, D. A., "Product differentiation in auditing: Auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issues", Canadian Certified General, ~ (1987)
  40. Sommer Jr, A., "Auditing audit committees : An educational opportunity for auditors", Accounting Horizons, 5(2), pp.91~ (1991)
  41. Stewart, J., "The association between audit partner rotation and audit fees : Empirical evidence from the Australian market", Auditing : A journal of practice theory, 35(1), pp.181~ (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)